Hi All,
How to disable TSM db mirroring? Please help me.
Here is the configuration of my db:
Volume Name (Copy 1) Volume Name (Copy 2) Volume Name (Copy 3)
/tsm/db/db1.dsm /tsm/dbcopy/dbcopy1.dsm
/tsm/db/db2.dsm /tsm/dbcopy/dbcopy2.dsm
/tsm/db/db3.dsm /tsm/dbcopy/dbcopy3.dsm
/tsm/db/d
Hi,
you can delete the copy volumes from TSM with
"delete dbvolume /tsm/dbcopy/dbcopyX.dsm"
with X as the volume Number.
After Maintenance you can recreate the volumes with the
"dsmfmt" tool and define the volumes in TSM with :
"define dbcopy /tsm/dbcopy/dbcopyX.dsm"
I think it's a good idea
Hello,
I've got a TSM server version 4.1.2 running on Windows2000. The library is a
Storagetek L180 with three DLT8000 drives.
The customer will change two of the drives with SDLT320 drives.
1. Does TSM 4.1.2 support already SDLT320 drives or is an upgrade to TSM 5.2.x
required.
2. How about
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:49:45 +0800
"Pole, Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe this will help.
>
> Try this
>
> Redbook SG246844
>
> Disaster recovery Strategies using TSM
>
> Section 8.3.3 page 179
>
> "Tape storage pools
>
Which is more or less the information that the concepts redbook al
Hi Steve, Christian and Mark!
Thank you very much for your replies! Looks like my diskpool is way too
small. I'll have to take some actions here, thanks!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Steve Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, Se
We use TSM v5 to back up Novell netware5 file servers and TSM v5/4.2 to
back up Novell netware 4 file servers.
We want to restore the data (using TSM) to Windows 2000 file servers..
We won't be restoring applications,O/S or executables from Novell to
windows only folders and files.
Restoring file p
See the client manual chapter "Restoring your data", sections "Standard
restore process" and "No query restore process".
Also see chapter "Managing Data for Client Nodes", section "Optimizing
Restore Operations for Clients" in the most current server Admin Guide for
additional info on optimizing f
Hi,
I have to define and start backups with policies:
daily archive - keep for 31 days
and on 1st day of every month archive - keep for 1 year.
how to do this?
with copy storagepools of different schedules?
STSM server is running AIX.
regards
Wojtek
Hi Remco!
The old TSM Windows client contained an HTML based live demo which explained
the progressive incremental. I can send it to you if you want?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, Septem
We are currently having problems performing incremental backups on a file system that
has a large amount of files. The daily changes to this file system are small so we are
only sending approximately 5 - 10 gig per backup however, since there are around
3,000,000 files to examine, the backup tak
You can use journal backup.
- Michael
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Mark Trancygier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 1. oktober 2003 15:28
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Incremental backups on file systems that contain a large number of
files
We are currently having problems performing inc
This is a new install.
TSM 5.2.1.1 on AIX 5.2 64-bit enabled.
L700e with LTO2 fibre drives. Drives defined fine as Tivoli devices.
The robotics will not define, the lsattr comes back empty.
>From the smit log: lsattr -c library -s 'scsi' -t 'ADSM-SCSI-LB' -D -O
I had to apply a lsattr fix t
there maybe a trade off with a selective backup of that filesystem or an
archive since there's no compare operations associated there. You may have
to do some benchmarking though to prove it.. thanks!.
--Justin Richard Bleistein
Unix/TSM Systems Administrator (Sungard eSourcing)
Desk: (856) 566 -
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:30:48 -0600
Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See the client manual chapter "Restoring your data", sections "Standard
> restore process" and "No query restore process".
>
> Also see chapter "Managing Data for Client Nodes", section "Optimizing
> Restore Operations f
All of a sudden we are getting an error that we've never seen before. They all are
with the adsm.sys folder and they all specify the management class error. We haven't
changed a thing on the server where TSM is concerned and our server group swears they
haven't changed a thing on the client si
We are running the TSM client and server on AIX. I thought journaled bakups were only
supported on Win 2000 and NT ?
Thanks,
Mark.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/01/03 09:51AM >>>
You can use journal backup.
- Michael
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Mark Trancygier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt,
Rman crosscheck will only expire those backups that belong to that node
during the RMAN crosscheck. This statement does not belong in the manual,
I am glad that you pointed this out. There is no need for your DBA's to be
concerned that other data is needlessly getting expired.
-
One of the things I do wen journaled services aren't a option is splitting
the TSM client into 2 or more TSM nodes, each with its own dirs/filespaces.
This brought back-up time for large fileservers down by half.
Regard,
Karel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Mark Trancygier [mailto:[EMAIL
>The old TSM Windows client contained an HTML based live demo which explained
>the progressive incremental. I can send it to you if you want?
The TSM online Flash demo would seem to be the same product overview:
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/tivoli/library/demos/storage-mgr.html
Another good prod
=> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 09:27:41 -0400, Mark Trancygier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> We are currently having problems performing incremental backups on a file
> system that has a large amount of files. The daily changes to this file
> system are small so we are only sending approximately 5 - 10 gig
So, I'm thinking of some DR scenaria, and I was considering:
If I make a backupset on a FILE devclass, and somehow consipre to move that
backupset to a box that I think might need it, can I restore from it just as a
file on disk?
Hmm, I think I should experiment, but I was curious if anyone had a
Hi,
I will throw this out there, though it is a wintel solution and will not
function as a solution under aix. We had a system with about 3 million
files. The disk was SAN attached and quite speedy. The system was
gig-ethernet attached and had no cpu/memory bottlencks. Journaling wasn't
an opt
Is the backup of the other files/folders successful?
When i saw this error, I deleted a (dummy) storagepool. (I also claimed, I
didn't change the setup)
Maybe this will help:
Check if the adsm.sys folder has got a special managementclass in the
include/exlude-list (dsm.opt or clopt)
Check to which
I have a Win2K server running a 3583 without RSM at TSM 5.1.6.2.
NO problems.
Documentation is confusing, though.
First thing you have to do is disable the RSM service.
Then install the 3583 driver that you download from IBM.
Then when you boot, the TSM device wizard will "see" the library.
Same here.
Our robotics are 9840 (A's) in 9710 libraries, the previous generation
before the 9940/L700 combination.
The STK robotics are incredibly elegant, fast, and reliable.
The 9840's are also rock solid and will take an incredible pounding; we have
had periods when we RUN the drives, 4 at a
Thanks Allen.
I think the virtualmountpoint option will be the best way to go, as we have a pretty
hearty SAN environment and I don't believe we have client disk contention. Are you
aware of any limitations on the number of virtualmountpoints per client ?
Thanks,
Mark.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
>If I were running a shop that supports TSM/HSM functions, I would argue for
>the highest-end product you can buy and go with either 3590 or STK.
In a shop with a goodly amount of money, based upon my experience I'd go for
tiered tape technologies: something like a 3590 library for primary tap
All,
The one thing I've always found to be a downside to TSM is the ability to
easily identify the EXACT amount of tapes required to rebuild an
environment to it's most current state. I have wrote SQL scripts
previously which performs a query against each TSM client and it's
filespaces for those
We are researching on getting a big disk array we want to use in tsm as
a virt. library.
So we define this disk array as a filetype library and use it to backup
the clients. Then we make a copy storage pool using a normal tape
library and take these tapes off site.
We have a pretty small environm
>The one thing I've always found to be a downside to TSM is the ability to
>easily identify the EXACT amount of tapes required to rebuild an
>environment to it's most current state. ...
That has been a Holy Grail quest for us customers. There remains no feasible
way to get such a list from the pr
Agreed, it is probably the most important shortcoming!
In terms of when a DR is performed for a client, surely the TSM client
performs a similar query with the TSM server to identify the files
required to be restored?
Maybe there's a smooth streamlined script for this purpose that IBM just
dont w
Hi all, I sent this out a few days ago but never saw it on the list, so here
goes again.
I have a question regarding Lan_free and db2 user exits. We are currently
running in an AIX environment (AIX 5.1 and a 5.1.7.1 TSM server and 4.33 on
the clients) with SAP on DB2. Last week we implemented lan-
Here's the situation: We are a managed hosting company that uses TSM
for backup, and we would like to hand off day to day administration of
the environement to the operations staff. There are a number of
inexperienced (in TSM) staff. We want a way to audit (beyond the normal
activity log) what
show volumeusage [nodename]
certainly helps...note too that the "show" commands are undocumented and
unsupported.
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Rowan O'Donoghue wrote:
> Agreed, it is probably the most important shortcoming!
>
> In terms of when a DR is performed for a client, surely the TSM client
> perf
Hello everyone!
I have just installed TSM's Operational Reporting Tool and I am having
problems with the email notification connection. It keeps telling me that
it is having problems with the SMTP server name. Here is the information I
have been given for the 2 mainframe servers that I am tr
I believe you have to export the client data as well.
IF not, you are assuming that data written by MVS "drivers" (yes, I know we
don't call them drivers in MVS, but still...) is in a format that can be
read by AIX drivers.
The whole point of EXPORT is to create a portable format that can move
ac
Michael, that's weird. I believe you, but I just had to say that it's
weird.
Mark, for AIX, since there's no journaled backups there, have you considered
-incrbydate's during the week, then a regular incremental on the weekend?
This greatly sped up the backup of one of our very large file systems
I have a database volume that appears in Storage Manager - labelled as
off-line, but I cannot delete as it says it is not defined?? The file
itself does not exist.
Any suggestions on how I remove it?
Stu
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may
Domino R5 and TDP Domino 5.1.5
The sample DSM.OPT file supplied by the TDP agent excludes the LOG.NSF file.
I just had a Domino admin question why it wasn't being backed up... I had no
answer to that.
Would backing up LOG.NSF be a good thing to start doing? Or just leave the
default Exclude?
Bil
=> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:56:41 -0400, Mark Trancygier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Thanks Allen.
> I think the virtualmountpoint option will be the best way to go, as we have
> a pretty hearty SAN environment and I don't believe we have client disk
> contention. Are you aware of any limitations o
Hi folks!
My environment is TSM 5.2 on Windows 2000, tapelibrary is 3583 lto on the
SAN.
II wonder.when defining path for tapelibrary and drives, should the
device parameter be \\.\Tape0 and Changer0 (which is how Windows sees the
devices?)etc, or mt0.0.0.1 an lb1.0.0.1(which is how TSM sees
Hi Sylvia,
Use mt0.0.0.1 and lb1.0.0.1 to define path it will work
- Himanshu
Sylvia Nergard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/01/2003 01:49 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Su
I am TSM 5.1.6.2, Win2K, 3583, LTO1, SCSI not SAN.
I use the mt0.0.0.x and lbx.0.0.1 names in the path defs.
If you will start the TSM device configuration "wizard" from the TSM console
icon,
those are the names that show up, and the wizard will even create the device
& path defs for you.
-O
One comment I would like to make here is with Michael Wheelock's
post. He makes a comment that "journaling wasn't an option as this was a
clustered system." This is not correct. Windows journaling IS supported and
does work on a MS Clustered system. We have had several instances of this
st
Is it possible to move from MVS to AIX without having to export all client
node data so long are your storage device is the same on both environments?
i.e. if my current environment has 2000 tapes full of client data, and I
want to move my environment from MVS to AIX, do I essentially have to expo
Yes, it's ugly.
Yes, as far as I know, exporting all the client data is the only supported
method.
Yes, it's a HECK of a lot of work.
Yes, it takes your 2000 tapes, creates 2000 portable tapes, which get
imported to create 2000 tapes.
I forget which version of TSM you are running; starting in 5.1
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 22:49, Sylvia Nergard wrote:
> My environment is TSM 5.2 on Windows 2000, tapelibrary is 3583 lto on the
> SAN.
>
> II wonder.when defining path for tapelibrary and drives, should the
> device parameter be \\.\Tape0 and Changer0 (which is how Windows sees the
> devi
I am currently replacing an ADSM 3.1.2.90 AIX sever with a TSM 5.1.5.x
Linux server. My solution was to export the server and policies without
any file data. I created a file device on an NFS filesystem and have
been exporting/importing a node at a time. If you have the ability to
run two servers a
Question:
Is the subfile backup feature available with the Netware clients. I know it is used on
the Win2k platforms, but have not seen any info about it not being supported on
different clients.
Thanks
John Stephens
I'm not sure what the difference is between MVS and os/390 and z/OS. I only
saw TSM 4.1 for MVS, but I saw 5.2 for os/390 and z/OS. If you can run 5.2,
then you can EXPORT NODE TOSERVER=aixtsmserver. That ought to greatly ease
your migration.
That being said, I think I'm going to wander over to
All,
I am running TSM 5.1.6.1 on AIX 5.1ML3. In the last few weeks it's started
exhibiting a rather strange problem where the scheduler seems not to contact the
clients to start the backup schedule.
Halting TSM and restarting it seems to fix it for a few days and then it will start
again.
C
Hey Mark,
Could your TSM server be running out of sessions (as per MAX SESSIONS?) -
perhaps you have tape mounts holding running sessions, (thus holding their
completion for new sessions)?
The prompter will only contact nodes when it has session slots available
during the backup startup window.
Hello,
I have done the steps which You described with TSM 3.7.4.0 which I'm
actually moving.
The problem is, driver adsmscsi.sys has probably some problems, it's marked
at the list
of drivers with yellow exclamation mark.
Krzysztof
> -Oryginalna wiadomość-
> Od: Prather, Wanda [SMTP:
My little input to your miracle:
Maybe switching to an domainuser alters the kind the tsm client uses to save
the data.
As an administrator he should use the backup api. As an domain usser he can
only use cifs access.
Kind Regards,
Stefan Holzwarth
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Pasc
54 matches
Mail list logo