Hello all,
I can't answer this question because I have never had to use a point in time
restore function. It seems as though over the weekend a SAN controller
upgrade has led to whole file systems lost and parts of others on a node.
The person responsible wants to restore only those files that wer
...
>Dec 3 21:10:17 twcsds001 Parity Error
>Dec 3 21:10:17 twcsds001 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING:
>/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/QLGC,[EMAIL PROTECTED],1 (isp2):
>
>We have replaced all the Ultra SCSI III (sbus) cards. These are the latest
>cards Sun has out. We have upgra
Assuming you have an on-site primary tapepool and maintain an off-site
copypool, this option identifies the primary pool tapes, but not copypool
tapes. However, the copypool tapes are the ones which should be used in
DR testing.
Kent Monthei
GlaxoSmithKline
"Adam Boyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Depending on your TSM server level, you could MOVE NODEDATA the client(s) to
a separate pool and take those tapes. If you don't want to take the primary
copy, then create a copypool and BA STGPOOL and take the copypool tapes.
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
First of all, Thanks Richard for your response. We have looked into your
suggestions and the SCSI cable connections are not loose, the SCSI chain
isn't too long and the here are the errors we get:
Dec 3 21:10:17 twcsds001 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING:
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/QLGC,[EMAIL PR
Curious, I am generating a backupset. Is the time it takes to generate a
backupset roughly the same amount
of time it would take to restore an entire client?
Thanks, I will try this and see how many tapes can be moved to overflow.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/26/2003 1:53:49 PM >>>
I don't think there is any good answer to that. It depends, of course, on
your data and the usage patterns at your site.
Some suggestions:
1) if you keep TSM DB backup tapes o
That's what we end up doing -- if it's off-site it goes in the bag and off
to the hot site. The last D/R test with the DLT-7000 drives hurt (physically
-- 46 tapes to the bag, 5 bags) but now that we're running LTO drives we
only have 112 tapes to drag around. We use custom-made padded bags sized a
>When I try to retrieve archived files using both the -filelist option
>and a new destination directory, I get:
>
>ANS1082E Invalid destination file specification '/export/home/aa/bb'
>entered
>
>But if I don't use -filelist but instead use the filename to be
>retrieved on the command line, it work
Hi Brian,
There is one other option, one that I believe I saw posted some time ago in
this list. If you're only after a few machines, and the scope of the
restore is limited, you can try the following:
At the client in question, add the line
TAPEPrompt Yes
to the dsm.opt file. Then go through
>I got you, Richard. This is exactly what is required from my point of view.
>We need to do a diaster recovery rehearsal, which I need to get the Required
>tapes to another location and restore whatever from there.
>
>In this case, I guess only option is to bring all the offsite tapes over and
>put
Our mainframe uses TSM client to backup the HFS files. It has come to my
attention that the OS/390 client is TSM 4.1.2 which is out of support. I've
scoured the ITSM web site and cannot find TSM Client downloads for OS/390.
Am I looking in the wrong place? Where would I find the latest client code
When I try to retrieve archived files using both the -filelist option
and a new destination directory, I get:
ANS1082E Invalid destination file specification '/export/home/aa/bb'
entered
But if I don't use -filelist but instead use the filename to be
retrieved on the command line, it works. My Sol
Paul Ripke:
> This is exactly the scenario we have with one of our TSM servers. With
> client initiated actions (backups/restores) the address/name configured
> in dsm.opt does specify the path of data taken to the server. Then, it's
> up to the routing table on the server for which path is taken
I got you, Richard. This is exactly what is required from my point of view. We need to
do a diaster recovery rehearsal, which I need to get the Required tapes to another
location and restore whatever from there.
In this case, I guess only option is to bring all the offsite tapes over and put the
>How to find out the offsite media list required for specific restoration?
>See, if I know the file or directory path and dates to restore, is there anyway
>to find out which tape should be used?
Brian - Whether onsite or offsite, the product provides no means for determining
what
(TSM server 5.1.6.5 on AIX 5.1 with essentially standard options)
>From observing DSMSERV's I/O behaviour via "topas",
I get the impression that it *writes* to the database volumes
(currently 14 files each covering a whole JFS-mirrored SSA disk)
in essentially single-threaded fashion, i.e. never e
Hey guys I am having problems using export server command. I have two
instance of tsm server running in one server. I want to export
information from one tsm server instance to another on the same box. I
read the admin guide but it does not say anything about not being able
to do that on two insta
Hello,
How to find out the offsite media list required for specific restoration? See,
if I know the file or directory path and dates to restore, is there anyway to find out
which tape should be used?
Any thought'd be appreciated.
Thanks,
Brian
Hi!
But I think in VMWare can you dedicate CPUs how many CPUs to each virtuel machine.
So in that case. How do you count the CPUs then? By each virtuel CPU or buy physical
CPU * each virtuel machine?
Hmmm..
A co-worker to me told me that he have read somewhere that you only pay for the
physical
Hi,
I just got time to check the mailing list after rebuild two window servers.
What is this Operational Reporter? Is it for client side?
Lan
At 04:02 PM 11/21/2003 +0200, you wrote:
I wasn't aware that there was any version other than the Windows version.
Would be great if they released it in a
>We have TSM 5.1 server running on Solaris 8 with a 3583 IBM LTO tape
>library that is scsi attached. Every month or so we get tape drive errors
>that hang the library so bad that we have to reboot to recover. TSM and
>tapeutil can not see the drives until after the reboot. The IBM CE's
>verified
Have you or the CE checked your firmware levels. There is a new version
of FW that came out a week or so ago. Make sure you check your drive sled
FW as well. If it is down rev you have to update the FW for the whole
box. It is not that painful a process from the we interface.
We are not runnin
We have TSM 5.1 server running on Solaris 8 with a 3583 IBM LTO tape
library that is scsi attached. Every month or so we get tape drive errors
that hang the library so bad that we have to reboot to recover. TSM and
tapeutil can not see the drives until after the reboot. The IBM CE's
verified that
Thanks Richard and Eduardo,
Here's how we resolved the problem.
It turned out to be a copy of nnotes.dll in the Winnt folder.
They had some problem installing the new version of Domino and were
instructed to remove that dll, but they moved it into Winnt. Winnt was in
the path. So TDP was hit
Cool, I thought it only happened to me. I did too saw 1 byte difference.
Thanks,
Sung Y. Lee
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zoltan
Forray/AC/VCUTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>cc:
To: People with TSM and Oracle DBA experience
AIX: 5.2
TSM (server and storage agent): 5.1.7.2
TDP: 5.2.0.0
B/A Client and API: 5.1.6.7
Problem: We will soon have a 3TB DB growing to 6-10TBs
in the future. I am trying to determine a
backup method for this data. Most (80-90%) of the
data never cha
In my experience in various attempts at IMPORT/EXPORT, the numbers *NEVER*
matched. Always seemed to be a small (1-10 bytes) difference.
Sung Y Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/02/2003 04:27 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
I have something similar working with Adaptec 3944 (differential SCSI) and
Symbios (ultra scsi) adapters.
-Lloyd
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:36:22 -0500
Hector Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote thusly:
> Greeting,
>
> Customer would like to have TSM 5.2 on Redhat AS 2.1 on Intel Xeon and
> DLT tape auto
I'm new to this group, so I don't know if this problem has been adressed
before. Here we go:
I installed the journal service on our main windows NT server for office
applications/files (with TSM-client 5.1.0) to optimize our backup-window.
TSM holds about 1.5 mill. files from this server.
Since th
>sorry for the slow reply. very busy.
>
>tapeutil i think is a utility and is part of the atape driver set. this =
>utility can be used to test and diagnose the functionality of your =
>library and tapedrives from the operating system and works independant =
>of TSM which can be very useful.=20
Th
Rod,
We are currently in the same process of trying to consolidate on VMWare.
We have a TSM client running succesfully on the Linux-Base of the Vmware
box, giving us a chance to backup complete Wintel guest operating systems as
single files, having the guest OS's suspended of course. This creates
32 matches
Mail list logo
