Hi all,
I would like to do some system monitoring on new TSM server on Solaris 5.9
before put it to production. I tried vmstat, netstat, prstat, and iostat
commands directed to logs and all is OK. I am monitoring disks by iostat (by
simple disk devices), but I need monitor TSM tape devices (throug
Wanda, you are correct. The copy in the copy pool may be fine, so the
backup version isn't really destroyed (assuming the copy in the copy pool
is still good). If a primary storage pool volume has damaged files,
RESTORE VOLUME can be attempted to restore the volume.
If the volume being audited is
Andy,
If the volume is audited with FIX=YES, BUT the file has a copy in a copy
pool, I don't think it gets deleted, does it?
Is it eligible for backup again in that case?
Thanks
Wanda
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 5:28 PM
Thanks for the explanation Andy - it makes sense. I am doing the
auditing with FIX=YES, so we should get another backup. I am hoping
this is not a very pervasive problem - I have not hit any other
"damaged" files yet.
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Andrew Raibeck wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> When a volume is aud
Hi Andy,
When a volume is audited with FIX=NO, damaged files are marked as such,
but not deleted. In this case, damaged files are not automatically
eligible for backup again just by virtue of being damaged. Consider the
possibility that the "damage" could be temporary, such as if the drive on
whic
If an active file is marked damaged by audit volume, is the file backed
up at the next opportunity?
We have a situation where at least one tape that had undiscovered
damaged files was copied to a copypool tape. Those files are not
recoverable at this time. We are contemplating a full audit on al
I'm interested in comparing retention settings that folks are using on
large netware volumes, and how you satisfy customer
requirements/expectations for long term storage.
As the volumes grow and files proliferate a blanket approach is getting
unmanageable. Getting the customer to identify their '
If an active file is marked damaged by audit volume, is the file backed
up at the next opportunity?
We have a situation where at least one tape that had undiscovered
damaged files was copied to a copypool tape. Those files are not
recoverable at this time. We are contemplating a full audit on al
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas, Matthew
>Does anyone have experience of migration from a Legato 6.1.3 (and a
couple
>of ageing 5.5 nodes) backup environment to TSM 5.2, specifically with
>regard
>to converting old backup data - is it even possible? Are
Hello all!
I had moved a dozen nodes from a test to a production TSM server. They
received the default management class for backups which should expire in 60
days. The only thing that changed on the node was where the server would
be backing up to through the servername and tcpip server address.
3590s and AIX (with the appropriate level of Atape) support multi-path
I/O. If I remember right, multi-path I/O is not turned on by default.
Turn it on and let AIX worry about fail-over of paths and performance.
Orville L. Lantto
Datatrend Technologies, Inc. (http://www.datatrend.com)
IBM Premie
Hi,
i'am currently testing KVS VaultStore for Fileservers.
My findings so far are
- replacing the original file by a stubfile changes the reparse
point of the file, so TSM is will cause a backup of this file by doing a
recall of the file during a full-incremental backup,
even
Hello *SMers,
Does anyone have experience of migration from a Legato 6.1.3 (and a couple
of ageing 5.5 nodes) backup environment to TSM 5.2, specifically with regard
to converting old backup data - is it even possible? Are there tools or
utilities anyone has come across that may be useful?
TIA,
Hi Richard,
I don't think include/exclude would really interfere with this. I am
focusing on the messages
04/07/2004 02:07:28 Successful incremental backup of '\\getback\q$\*'
04/08/2004 07:47:50 Successful incremental backup of '\\gwise99\gwise\*'
These indicate that somewhere along the line th
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nancy Reeves
>Would those of you who have some kind of a chargeback system please let
me
>know what you do?
Take a look at IBM Tivoli Storage Resource Manager. It has a chargeback
module that might interest you.
--
Mark Stapleto
Thanks Andy,
We'll try your suggestions (and Richard's as well) and see what we get.
Ted
At 09:27 AM 4/8/2004 -0600, you wrote:
Hi Ted,
The '\*' is almost certainly being specified somewhere. Whether it is in
the domain statement, objects field of the schedule, file specification
from the comma
Hi,
This is my third post in as many days - thanks for all the help so far!
I have just 2 more questions:
1. We are migrating from GroupWise 6 to MS Exchange soon. We have a user base of appx.
500 and will be implementing a KVS storage solution to handle mails archived-by-date.
Does anyone have
Would those of you who have some kind of a chargeback system please let me
know what you do?
We are about to implement an upgrade and believe that now is the time to
start charging. Here are some of the things we have considered.
* 1 time set up fee
* annual fee per client (to cover Tivoli licens
Hi Ted,
The '\*' is almost certainly being specified somewhere. Whether it is in
the domain statement, objects field of the schedule, file specification
from the command line, or client options set is immaterial.
On the 5.2 client that experiences the problem, what does the following
command show
>On both of these clients, the filespaces are included using a domain
>statement, and the backups are simply run with a schedule where
>action=incremental, without explicitly specifying any objects.
Ted - Does 'dsmc q inclexcl' show any "interference" with that intention?
Richard Sims
At 09:01 AM 4/8/2004 -0600, you wrote:
When performing the backup, do not append '\*' to the end of the share
name (the messages you include in your post suggest that this is what you
are dong):
Andy,
On both of these clients, the filespaces are included using a domain
statement, and the backups a
When performing the backup, do not append '\*' to the end of the share
name (the messages you include in your post suggest that this is what you
are dong):
Do this: dsmc i \\machinename\sharename
Not this: dsmc i \\machinename\sharename\* -subdir=yes
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Gro
We have two customers that back up remote drives. One client was recently
upgraded to version 5.2.2.5 (from 4.x) and the other is running at
5.1.6.6. Both clients are Win2K servers.
On the client that was upgraded, the backup_end field (Backup Completion
date/time) for that filespace has not cha
Hi
My environment is as follows
win2000 tsm server running 5.2.2.3
win2000 client running storageagent 5.2.2.3 and b/a client 5.2.2.9 (qlogic
2340 adapter)
ibm 3584 library . LTO2 drives SAN attached
2Gb SAN
I am trying to achieve snapshot image backup of a drive on the win2k client.
What happe
Hi ITSM'rs,
I have a new fiber attached 3590 implementation that I
would like advice on. I'm not a SAN architect nor an
AIX admin (two strikes?)so I'd like the opinion of
anyone that has a similiar infrastructure in place.
I will have 16 3590-E1A drives attached to two McData
switches using each
Hi, Richard. Generally what we do is:
Load new system with W2K Server, service packs, and TSM client. Set hostname to same
name as old system.
Restore all drives and then the system object. Take care to NOT reboot before
everything is restored.
Reboot.
Now - if you are restoring to the sam
We are currently implementing the first phase of a High Availability/
Disaster recovery Site within 10 miles of our primary location. One of
these HA/DR features is a redundant TSM server and a LTO tape Library.
This Tape library will become the Copypool for the primary onsite tape
library. The co
We've heard from people who are pursuing the tradition of sending
tapes offsite.
Is anyone employing any kind of electronic transmission or
electronic vaulting to do away with the archaic trucking model?
Sadly, tapes *can* go astray when given over to an offsite service,
as most notoriously happe
We have about 1400 offsite tapes and move about 100 tapes offsite and
onsite each day. We have a room in a building about 2 miles from our
site with multiple tape racks. One of our operations staff takes the
new tapes offsite each day and pulls and brings back the old tapes.
David Ehresman
Unive
...
>05-04-2004 12:30:29 ConsoleEventHandler(): Caught Ctrl-C console event .
...
>5-04-2004 12:30:39 Server date/time: 05-04-2004 12:22:18
...
> Sess Comm. Sess Wait Bytes Bytes Sess Platform Client Name
>Number Method StateTimeSent Recvd Type
>-- -- -- -- --
Hi,
I have a NAS device that I have been backing up successfully with TSM. Just recently I
have noticed that when I issue 'Q EVE * * BEGIND=-1' that the device has been 'Missed'.
If I look at the dsmerr.log I get the following output:
05-04-2004 12:30:29 ConsoleEventHandler(): Caught Ctrl-C cons
31 matches
Mail list logo
