TSM TDP for DB2 does'nt work

Hello! Everybody! We installed TSM backup client and api client at LINUX/390,the DB2 version is V7.1. The backup client works fine! but the api does'nt work! when issue db2 backup ,the following condition occurs! Can any one help! Thanks in advance!!

Managed Systems

** Proprietary ** Studying setting up a managed TSM system between two servers eight (8) miles apart. 1. Any pros or cons. 2. If the configuration TSM system goes down, will the managed system continue to run? James Fletcher Supervisor, Operating Systems Washington Metro Transit Authority Tele:

Re: Novell Cluster (San volumes not getting backed up)

Hi Joel, I just wanted to make sure that I had thanked you properly for this reply to my post. Between your post and those of a few other regular posters, everything has been set up and running smoothly for a couple of weeks now. I sometimes get so caught-up in my work that I forget what a

DB2 user exit for TSM

Hi, should I set up the DB2 user exit for TSM if I want to restore the database online. My platform is windows 2000, DB2 is v7.1, TSM is 5.2.2. Thanks Andy - Post your free ad now! Yahoo! Canada Personals

Unsuccessful attempt to create a restore Test Schedule.

Hi All Any help would be appreciated. I am trying to create Daily Schedule to restore files, from on node to another , with no success ! 06/24/2004 14:45:57 ANR2017I Administrator BILL issued command: UPDATE SCHEDULE MISC RESTORE_S2321_S2401 DESCRIPTION=Daily

TSM server Linux update travails

I am trying to update my TSM Linux server from 5.2.2.3 to 5.2.2.5. When I do the rpm -Uvh TIVsm-server*.rpm to do the install, I get an error message about my license file /tmp/license/status.dat not being there/correct and therefore the TSM must not be installed. Why is it looking for the

Re: TSM server Linux update travails

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU When I do the rpm -Uvh TIVsm-server*.rpm to do the install, I get an error message about my license file /tmp/license/status.dat not being there/correct and therefore the TSM must not be installed. Why is

Re: Size of backed up file does not match size of restored file

Hi Tim, This might be APAR IC40702. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line

Re: TSM server Linux update travails

I did. I just shortened the email example. Either way, my command would only hit the one rpm file in the directory I was running it from, since I made it unique enough. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/24/2004 10:13:44 AM: From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: TSM server Linux update travails

you can do a mkdir /tmp/license and touch /tmp/license/status.dat then it should work. This file is created normally when you run the install script on the installation cd after reading and agreeing with the license agreement. I guess by creating this file by hand you agree with a license

unused management classes

Hello everyone! Is there any way that I can tell which backup/archive copy groups/managment classes are not being used? I'm sure there is a select statement that I can run, but I am not sure of the syntax. Thanks in advance! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems

Re: TSM server Linux update travails

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU When I do the rpm -Uvh TIVsm-server*.rpm to do the install, I get an error message about my license file /tmp/license/status.dat not being there/correct and therefore the TSM must not be installed. Why is

Re: Size of backed up file does not match size of restored file

Thanks, Andy that sounds like it could be it! The APAR states: If the TSM client inspection phase examines a file which changes shortly afer the inspection occurs, but before the actual data is sent to the TSM server, an improper file backup of the object will exist on the TSM server. This can

cluster problems

Hello everyone, We are still trying to get our TSM Novell cluster up and running. We get no console screen when loaded and we are using the schedule parameter on the load line. TSM client 5.2.2 Novell 6 sp3 Here is our current dsm.opt file a cluster node (Is it something we are missing here?)

TDP, Exchange 2003, and SANs

I am working up my plan to backup our new Exchange 2003 storage groups. Our environment includes: Exchange 2003 running on Windows 2003 TSM 5.2.2.5 running on AIX 5.2 Shark storage for the AIX server's disk based storage EVA (I think) storage for the Exchange server data LTO1 in a 3584 accessed

Re: Unsuccessful attempt to create a restore Test Schedule.

Bill, Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you are trying to use a Netware command (load dsmc) to restore data from one Windows box to another. Try putting the restore command (something like dsmc restore \\src\c$\* \\tgt\d$\restore\fromsrc\ ...) you want to run in a batch/script file on the

Re: TDP, Exchange 2003, and SANs

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Lundstedt I read through the TDP for Exchange v5.2 documentation. It appears that I cannot split up the different data types (meta, data, logs) into different management classes, but I can put the different backup types

TSM Server on Linux with 8mm-drive

Hello, I'm trying to install a small test server on a linux machine with a single 8mm scsi drive. When defining the path to the drive (def path server1 8mmdrive1 srctype=server desttype=drive library=manlib device=/dev/st0) I only get this error : ANR8420E DEFINE PATH: An I/O error occured while

Re: TSM server Linux update travails

Zoltan, I just went through this last week. I just copied my status.dat to a /tmp/license/status.dat and the update worked fine. It even deleted the /tmp/license/status.dat file folder afterwards. I've been running 5.2.2.5 for over a week now. Some RPM install glitch that IBM hopefully fixes

Re: TDP, Exchange 2003, and SANs

Todd, I have embedded some answers below. Thanks, Del ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/24/2004 10:39:59 AM: I am working up my plan to backup our new Exchange 2003 storage groups. Our environment includes: Exchange

Re: TDP, Exchange 2003, and SANs

Yeah.. I read that in the documentation, and understand that log files are deleted after a successful incremental, and not deleted after a successful diff... But, I am looking for more detail in the actual transfer and storage, as the rest of my email indicated. Thx though Stapleton, Mark

Re: TDP, Exchange 2003, and SANs

Del, Thanks.. follow up question... You said... Data Protection for Exchange performs incremental and differential backups by backing up the full transaction log files to TSM. They are all placed into a single TSM backup object. From this, would it be safe to assume that the data from hundreds

Re: Unsuccessful attempt to create a restore Test Schedule.

Notwithstanding the syntactical problems, this is not a very good way to approach this kind of problem. Among other things, I don't think you want to go about exposing node passwords in your schedule definitions and activity log. Instead, why not permit node s2401 to access files belonging to

Re: TSM server Linux update travails

Thanks for the help/responses. I did as suggested and copied the status.dat file to where it was looking for it and the install went clean. Now, if someone can tell me why the ACTIVITY LOG query from the webadmin, has not been fixed (still forces an erroneous DOMAINNAME parm with a value that I

Re: TSM server Linux update travails

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Now, if someone can tell me why the ACTIVITY LOG query from the webadmin, has not been fixed (still forces an erroneous DOMAINNAME parm with a value that I can not get rid of, thereby making it

Re: TDP, Exchange 2003, and SANs

Todd, Answers embedded. Thanks, Del ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/24/2004 11:17:55 AM: Del, Thanks.. follow up question... You said... Data Protection for Exchange performs incremental and differential

Re: Size of backed up file does not match size of restored file

If the file is of size A (1,272,979,456 bytes in your case) when the backup starts, and in the middle of the backup, changes to size B ( 1,278,222,336 bytes), then TSM only backs up size A bytes of the file. Note that the output shows that size B bytes were backed up; that output is wrong. Upon

Re: TSM server Linux update travails

I have done that with 5.2.2.1 and 5.2.2.3 but did not see a difference. I will try it, again. Thanks for the suggestion ! Stapleton, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/24/2004 11:36 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To

Re: TDP, Exchange 2003, and SANs

Thanks, Del. My comment regarding living with an incomplete/incorrect point of recovery was solely meant to represent that in a complete data center wipe-out, the existing full and incrementals that we have offsite would not accurately represent what was in a particular mailbox at the time of

Re: Size of backed up file does not match size of restored file

Thanks Andy! -Original Message- From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 24, 2004 10:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Size of backed up file does not match size of restored file If the file is of size A (1,272,979,456 bytes in your case) when the backup starts,

RTFM Assistance

I would like to do a dbbackup to a disk on another server, but not part of a storage pool, just to a file (that will be on a separate machine). Could someone please tell me where to RTFM (Read The Fine Manual) so I can get this right? I would be happy either doing this from a command file (batch

Restore problem

I am trying to do a restore and when it gets to a certain point I get the following message: ANS2613S A protocol error occurred in communications between the browser and the client. The restore then stops/hangs Sun client using TSM client version 5.1.5 TSM version

Re: RTFM Assistance

Define device class and backup db. Basically you define a device class that looks something like: Device Class Name: SERVERA evice Access Strategy: Sequential Storage Pool Count: 0 Device Type: FILE Format: DRIVE Est/Max Capacity (MB): 71,680.0 Mount

Re: TSM server Linux update travails

Well, this didn't do it. Stopped the server and did the runfile which completed successfully. Still does the same thing. ALso made sure to dump the IE/Mozilla cache. I remember having this problem on the AIX TSM server at the 5.2.2.0 level and upgrading to 5.2.2.3(4) took care of it. But not on

Re: RTFM Assistance

that is an OS type issue... just create some form of network file system mounted up on your server, create the device class of type FILE pointing to that area, then use that device class to do your DB backup to... Ugh... I'm not the windows type person but say you have a K: disk that is

Re: TDP, Exchange 2003, and SANs

Todd, Again, you don't need to worry about it. When Data Protection for Exchange signals that it will start a backup, the Exchange Server starts a new set of logs. That is, the current transaction logs are no longer written to and are marked full and backed up (even though there may be some

Re: anyone have script for multi-session/multi-filespace restore?

Well I have looked at everyones responses. And I would like to thank everyone who has responded. I know it takes time and effert to do so. Fundimentally I don't think I can use collocation by Filespace. I would be using 6x as many tapes for the task if I put the COPYPOOL tapes like that.

Re: RTFM Assistance

You may also have to change the (Windows) properties of the TSM service to run under a network-enabled account. By default it usually runs under the SYSTEM account, and so may not have the rights to create files on another server's disk. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager

More TSM Linux issues

I think I have the answer to this, but would like someone to verify since I don't speak hardware driver-ese. On this TSM Linux server, the 3590 drives it uses (FC via QLOGIC), are constantly trashing the tapes it writes to. Almost every tape is marked as READONLY. Upon investigation, I found a

TSM on zOS throughput

I have a client running TSM 5.1 on zOS and a Cisco CIP card. Currently we can't seem to push it faster than 9GB/hour. The network guys say that the CIP is only getting 20Mb/sec on each side, which is about the 9GB/hour rate. But it doesn't seem to matter if I'm driving 40 clients or just a

Open file backup in UNIX / LINUX / AIX / SUN

Dear All, Greetings !! Just a quick question: Can We take backup with Online Image Support and Open File support in UNIX / AIX / LINUX? Please elaborate! Yes: is the answer for Windows. Warm Wishes ! Sadi