Works fine for us
Clients 5.1.5 because of the diffucilty of getting through change control on all the
systems.
Server 5.2.2.3
AIX 5.1 RML05
Steve Harris
AIX and TSM Admin
Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13/08/2004 1:30:25 >>>
Hello Everybody,
Looking for feedback
What version of the TSM Client are you using? Is this Windows 2000 with
service pack 4?
Melinda Cooper
Senior Information Center Analyst
Work - 425.783.4467
Pager - 425.438.5981
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 3:24 PM
To
Hi all,
Has anyone ever come across an issue where the Tivoli client locks up a Win2k system?
This is happening fairly regularly with one of the Win2k boxes in our environment.
Here are a few small excerpts from the dsmsched.log file during the times the system
locks up:
---
I'm researching on a test Solaris tsm client, how to create api's because I
have a proprietary application
which tsm doesn't commercially, officially support. So I want to write an
api/tdp for it. I downloaded the pdf
on tsm api programming. I can't compile the api sample application with:
"gcc" an
Client is 5.2.2.9 running on AIX5.2 with HACMP.
On AIX, how do I setup the baclient to recognize more than one node name,
so I can start multiple "dsmc sched" processes; one for the local drives,
and one for each shared resource group (I have made this work on Windows
boxes, but this is the first
This is a Windows question, not a TSM question ...
How can you "prune" a log file (not dsmsched.log or
dsmerror.log) to keep it to a manageable size? We've
got a lot of other log files generated by the TDP
software on the clients, and they are growing quite
large.
Were this unix, I'd just tail o
Well... it's difficult to give a better answer when I have so little to go
on. If you were to post a copy of the (complete) dsmsched.log file, your
options file, complete schedule definition, and error log, then I can take
a better look and see what's going on.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Sof
I've been looking and looking but don't see how they are being targeted
even before I sent out my question. The schedule is squeaky clean. I
even created a brand new schedule just for this one and ran it this
afternoon. The same thing happened.
I will keep looking and thanks for responding.
R
These directories are being targeted for the backup in some fashion.
Review the dsmsched.log file from the beginning (of the backup cycle) to
see what is going on. Check the schedule definition on the server.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Subject: TSM 5.2.2 64bit on AIX 5.2 64bit
Hi All,
I have recently upgraded TSM to version 5.2.2 (32bit) but needed 64bit for
sql-backtrack. IBM told me to uninstall all 32bit filesets and install the
64bit filesets which I did. Now I have no client software listed and can
only use the web inte
Does anyone know why I am seeing these messages:
08/12/2004 03:48:43 Successful incremental backup of
'\\server001\e$\Users\NRodier\WoodMac CAT\*'
08/12/2004 03:48:58 Successful incremental backup of
'\\server001\e$\Users\PCampisi\tsy\*'
Instead of:
Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\
The access on all except one is OFFSITE. That one is
UNAVAILABLE, but that's the one that's getting sent
off-site today.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, Tracy -
>
> The message description qualifies the condition as
> *usable* volumes,
> which may be the key. I would query the copy
> storag
Yes, this storage pool does show up under "Copy
Storage Pools" from a q drmstatus.
--- "Stapleton, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of T. Lists
> >Every day when I run DR prepare, I've been getting
> >this warning message for
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of T. Lists
>Every day when I run DR prepare, I've been getting
>this warning message for one of my copy storage pools:
>
>ANR6913W PREPARE: No volumes with backup data exist in
>copy storage pool COPY_POOL_2.
Have you run SET DRMC
Hey all,
Every day when I run DR prepare, I've been getting
this warning message for one of my copy storage pools:
ANR6913W PREPARE: No volumes with backup data exist in
copy storage pool COPY_POOL_2.
I've looked up the verbage on the warning, and it
says:
ANR6913W Command: No volumes with back
I took your code and added a "max" function.
Not sure if this is the best SQL way to deal with it but it makes the "group
by" happy and seems to work:
select max(st.STGPOOL_NAME) as "STGPOOL", max(st.maxscratch) as
"MAXSCRATCH", (count(vo.VOLUME_NAME))as "# of tapes" from volumes vo,
stgpools st
Hi All,
I have recently upgraded TSM to version 5.2.2 (32bit) but needed 64bit for
sql-backtrack. IBM told me to uninstall all 32bit filesets and install the
64bit filesets which I did. Now I have no client software listed and can
only use the web interface. dsmadmc no longer works..and the
Ok, this should be simple, but it's driving me nuts.
I have 2 simple select statements that I'm trying to combine
into 1 but it's not working.
Here are the 2 scripts and their output:
tsm: TSMSERV1A>select STGPOOL_NAME, MAXSCRATCH from stgpools where
DEVCLASS like
On 12 Aug 2004 at 11:35, David E Ehresman wrote:
> Anyone running NW65 SP2 yet? If so, has SP2 fixed any of the memory
> leaks?
>
> David Ehresman
> University of Louisville
>
I think that it has - or certainly reduced them!
Tom
==
Tom Anstey
Institute of Molecular M
Mark,
The schedule looks good; however ,I believe that each object should be
surrounded by " " similar to below. Yes, you will need to specify
filespaces.
Also you should add -subdir=yes and also you can list a maximum of 20
objects.I see you have more than 20 filespaces, so if you are
Anyone running NW65 SP2 yet? If so, has SP2 fixed any of the memory
leaks?
David Ehresman
University of Louisville
Thanks Fernando that was it! Gui was not running
"Fernando Figueiredo (EDS)" wrote:
> Do you have the client agent running?
>
> Fernando Figueiredo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Timothy Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: quinta-feira, 12 de Agosto de 2004 15:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECT
Hello Everybody,
Looking for feedback on stability issues with the following scenerio?
Anyone know of any issues with running TSM 5.2 and AIX 5.1?
Current Setup:
Tivoli Version 5.1.6.5
Aix 5.1
P660
Library =IBM 3584-LTO 1
We are planning to upgrade Tivoli to 5.2.3 while AIX is still at 5.1
1.
Try " and (start_time between current_timestamp - 24 hours and
current_timestamp)"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Coats, Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/12/2004 09:57 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
[EMAIL PROTECTE
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of hassan hani
>i have a duration of the backup retries of a changed file
>about 30 minutes.
>
>i want to change.
>
>is there a parameter to set the duration between two retries
>of a changing file backup .
Retries for changed f
Do you have the client agent running?
Fernando Figueiredo
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quinta-feira, 12 de Agosto de 2004 15:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: can't connect to client gui
Hi everyone
I can't connect to a client gui to do a re
While moving our TSM setup to a new server, I was having trouble with
the license installation. I'd sworn I'd installed all of the proper
license packages, but I still got the expiring evaluation licenses on
the server.
The problem was that the new server was running AIX 5.2, and I'd
installed *bo
Thanks to all who replied. ... Sofar I have
Select Entity,Start_Time,Stop_time,successful from summary -
where activity='BACKUP' order by entity
But I am having problems getting into the where clause the eqivalent of
AND start_time > TODAY -1 at 08:00
Yes, I know the 'TODAY -1 at 08:00'
Hello all,
How does TSM handle files that were excluded but now are being backed
up? Does it statistically consider these files to be re-bound or just
new? I would guess it would see them as new, but I have seen in some
cases the re-bound file counts spike and level off on some servers that
we r
Hi everyone
I can't connect to a client gui to do a restore when I try I get
"The paged connect displayed" this just happened all of a sudden
as I had been connecting to it earlier.
Can anyone tell me the possible causes?
Thanks for any help/causes
Sun client version 4.2
TSM 5.2.1.3 aix 5.2
hi all,
i have a duration of the backup retries of a changed file about 30 minutes.
i want to change.
is there a parameter to set the duration between two retries of a changing
file backup .
thanks you
_
Dialoguez en direct et gratuit
Check the install READMEs. One of the TSM 5.2.xx READMEs specifies a minimum atape
level.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/11/2004 2:55:23 PM >>>
Hi, our 3494 magstar library is running VERY slow. Take 10-20 mn to mount a
tape (3590). A checkin with checklabel=no takes 1-2 mn !
We upgraded our TS
Richard,
Thanks for the info.
Geert
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/08/2004
15:39:12:
> >This seemed very usefull, but I don't find all backup clients in this
> >table. Only some of the
> >client machines show in the entity field.
> >
> >Any reason for this?
>
> See in
>This seemed very usefull, but I don't find all backup clients in this
>table. Only some of the
>client machines show in the entity field.
>
>Any reason for this?
See innumerable past postings about the Summary Table and reliability.
The missing clients are probably 5.1, which had problems in this
I checked, and the dsmcad was running on all five missed servers. I have two
schedules, one for the AIX backup and one for Windows.
But according to my origianl post, the tail of the dsmsched.log shows as the
backup having executed ?!?!?!?
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EM
Hi All, never tried this, but we are going to replace some hardware over
the weekend, and want to schedule a complete backup of the server. Below
is what I set up, but wondered if I needed to put the filespaces in the
objects box. Since I'm running a selective backup, do I need to specify
filespace
"Missed" means the schedule did not run or even start. Mostly the cause
at my site is the the scheduler or dsmcad was not running to accept
contact from TSM server. Check carefully what schedule was "missed"
and what you got a summary report from saying o.k.
Do you have multiple schedules for so
Hi,
This seemed very usefull, but I don't find all backup clients in this
table. Only some of the
client machines show in the entity field.
Any reason for this?
Thanks,
Geert
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/08/2004
14:41:43:
> The easy way is to meke sql query:
> se
You should upgrade the TSM client, as well. I had a variety of issues and
then upgraded to the 5.2.2.9 level. There are a few entries in the README
for 5.2.2.9 that talks about memory leaks and such !
5.2.3.0 is the latest level !
"Hougaard.Flemming FHG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Di
Hi Everybody,
I've set myself up in Tivoli to be sent the summary report of the previous
night's backup.When I checked the mail, it informed me that I had missed 5
schedules for 5 different servers, each one an incremental backup. However,
when I view the dsmsched.log, I see that the backup went t
Hi Joni
If you are using IBM LTO2 drives, only the Atape driver or its Solaris
equivalent have to be installed. As for the Version levels for server and
storage agent, checkout the 5.2.3.0 readme file, there has been some
improvement as to what is supported.
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tiv
Hey!
We are going to install the storage agent onto our solaris and AIX servers
and it states that we should install the SCSI device support TICsm Sdev,
but we have already installed the IBM device drivers (ATape and IBMtape).
Do we have to install Tivoli's device support code? My thoughts are th
Flemming,
We have had similar problems as well. We have updated to the
TSA5UP15 patch and all of the machines that have that update no longer
have the memory problems.
Regards, Darren
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/12/04 02:39AM >>>
Hi All ;o)
I've got an consitent problem with TSM and NetWare 6.5
The easy way is to meke sql query:
select * from summary
You can see the columns and make additional filtering or grouping ot what
you need
Regards,
Svetoslav Tolev
"Coats, Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12.08.2004 14:11
Please respond to
"A
hi all , i hope somebody can help me ...
i cannot believe this, i have never seen this before
client AIX 5.2 ml3, 32bit kernel, everything is ok and in great shape
but when doing simple install throug smit (i-ve done that 300 times before)
of 5.2.3.0 client
i cracks with this messagess >
--
A real easy way to do this is to run a backup against the storage pool.
This is how I found that I had accidently turned on silultaneous writes.
The daily backup of the stgpool was running, but not moving any data.
cory
*E-Mail Confidentiality Notice*
This message (including any attachmen
That's one of the shining moments of TSM. You don't need to check in
copy pool tapes in order to reclaim them. Just set your reclamation
level for the pool, and TSM will reclaim them by using the copies of
files existing in the primary tape pool.
--
Mark Stapleton
>-Original Message-
>F
Is there a query or SQL query I could run to get me that can tell me, on a
per client basis, how long the backup took from the servers perspective for
each backup that ran in the last 24 hours?
TIA ... JC
Hi,
Does anyone know how to get the relationship between primary and copy
pool. Before my COPY_POOL reclamation I want to know which primary
volumes I'll need to check in into the library.
TIA
Fernando Figueiredo
EDS SAP Systems Administrator
Hello,
we had to update to 5.2.x.x because we needed the 3592 support.
The 5.1.8.0 we had before was the most stable version we had.
I opend a PMR but IBM haven`t answered yet.
We also have another two problems.
---1st Problem---
On some clients (AIX, Win, ...) we have following messages in th
Hi All ;o)
I've got an consitent problem with TSM and NetWare 6.5 Cluster enviroments! At several
customers sites, I've noticed that they are forced to restart the clusternode's within
14 - 30 days (depending on the amount of RAM) - The funny thing is, that it don't seem
to be the backup module
51 matches
Mail list logo