Joerg,
What other "TSM agents" (also called TDPs) do you think
that you can encrypt with? You can COMPRESS with all of them...
because it is done in the TSM API... which the "TDPs" use.
But, the TSM API does NOT support encryption quite yet. However...
watch this space... because this is a known
If you are trying to define a client schedule where the OPTIONS includes
the client -OPTFILE option, then that is not valid. -OPTFILE is valid only
when launching the client, i.e. "dsmc -optfile=dsm.opt.alt"
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andy Carlson
>I don't see reclaimstgpool as an option on copy storage pools
>- am I missing something?
Nope. You cannot set a RECLAIMSTGPOOL for a copy storage pool, which of
course means that if you have a one-drive library yo
I don't see reclaimstgpool as an option on copy storage pools - am I
missing something?
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Lee, Gary D. wrote:
> I would use the suggestion of redirecting the destination of your storage pools to
> the new devclass for 3592s.
>
> Another option is to create the new pools as orv
I know this is a little late, but here is what we did. I changed from
copying my primary pool from 9840's to 3592. I then let attrition
whittle down the 9840 pool until such time as I thought the copy might
get done in a reasonable amount of time, then did a copy and deleted the
rest of the 9840
It probably depends a lot on the history of your particular site. As
Wanda mentioned, and I would agree, it's much easier to maintain your
option-sets from one place (the server). In our case, we just got
installed earlier this year, so it was almost a no-brainer to use server
side cloptsets. Fo
The Windows client is backing up to a disk storage pool on a Clariion array. There is
no other activity on the TSM server.
Thanks.
DW
According to the TSM most current doc (http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/TSM390N/GC32-0776-02/en_US/HTML/anrmrf522tfrm.htm)
this is how I should define the devclass and the reply I received after,
tsm: MGECC_SERVER>DEFine DEVclass CART3590E DEVType=3590 ESTCAPacity=20G FORMAT=3590E-C COMPre
Several other points you didn't mention are whether you are going
to Disk Pool or straight to Tape and what type of each are you using.
How much other activity going on on TSM server at the same time?
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-43
The file size that I tested was 500MB. While the backup is running at 11 MB/sec I
used FTP to send another large file down the same pipes and it transfered at 49
MB/sec. So I know that the pipes between server and client will handle the load.
I have adjusted the TCPWINDOWSIZE to 64 on the serv
also are you doing client compression ?
Dwight E. Cook
Systems Management Integration Professional, Advanced
Integrated Storage Management
TSM Administration
(877) 625-4186
Ben Bullock
On Oct 21, 2004, at 3:35 PM, Dameon White wrote:
We just upgraded our TSM server and a few clients with GigE adapters.
When I FTP a file from client to server, I am seeing approximately
65MB/sec. When I backup the client I am only seeing 11 MB/sec. Is
there a setting that I forgot to set/adjust?
I am currently running TSM 5.1.9.3 on W2K. With Wanda and others help,
I expect to migrate to 5.2.x.x in the near future. We recently upgraded
our mainframe to a z800 and as part of the package we got z/Linux with
SLES8. We like the stability of the Linux and the mainframe and so we
are motivate
Could be the speed of the devices in the storage pools. Is it
going to disk? Directly to tape?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dameon White
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GigE Conversi
We just upgraded our TSM server and a few clients with GigE adapters. When I FTP a
file from client to server, I am seeing approximately 65MB/sec. When I backup the
client I am only seeing 11 MB/sec. Is there a setting that I forgot to set/adjust?
Thanks for any help.
DW
Server
AIX 5.1 ML4
T
On Oct 21, 2004, at 3:06 PM, Shannon Bach wrote:
When I tried to add the format=drive option, it came back with an
invalid option error. I couldn't figure out where I put this. I
followed the manual's format but the manual was 5.2 and my server is
5.1.7. Could this be the problem?
Why would you not
Well, consider if your "corporate environment" is 400 machines spread
over 15 buildings.
If you decide you want to EXCLUDE (i.e., not back up)
C:\Windows\TEMP\...\*,
you have to visit/touch all 400 machines somehow to update their client
option files.
If you put that exlude in a client option set
When I tried to add the format=drive option, it came back with an invalid option error. I couldn't figure out where I put this. I followed the manual's format but the manual was 5.2 and my server is 5.1.7. Could this be the problem?
Shannon
Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Di
I have been looking into implementing the server side options for a
while now however the more I look into it the more I ask myself what
good it does. I was wondering if anyone else used this option in TSM and
if so are there any real benefits over having client based options files
in a standard co
(See answers below questions).
I am positioning to migrate TSM Server 5.1.9.3 to 5.2.2 on a W2K box. I
would feel more comfortable if I understood how a few things worked in
this migration process given that I have to uninstall the current
version.
1) Are there files that the uninstall does not
I am positioning to migrate TSM Server 5.1.9.3 to 5.2.2 on a W2K box. I
would feel more comfortable if I understood how a few things worked in
this migration process given that I have to uninstall the current version.
1) Are there files that the uninstall does not remove that are used by
the next
On Oct 21, 2004, at 1:14 PM, Shannon Bach wrote:
Is the only differance between the two drives the Estimated Capacity?
Shannon - Not reflected in your devclass summaries was the critical
definition element: Format. That's the key difference
between 3590B and E in TSM.
Richard Sims
Wanda,
I have "tried this at home" and did not run in to any problems other than
the video card I had was not supported on Windows 2003.
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (858) 826-4062
Pager: (877) 854-0975
>-Original Message
I just put spaces between my options... (dont have any that im using quotes with)
R.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Schaub [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help on using multiple options in a client schedule
TSM server 5.
TSM server 5.2.2.5
I'm trying to test out a client schedule for a set of windows clients
that uses an alternate dsm.opt that I have created, and also bypasses
the normal journal type of incremental that runs daily.
I just cant seem to get the syntax correct when I try them both (either
one works b
We want to upgrade one of our Win2K TSM servers to Win2003.
We are currently on TSM 5.2.2.2.
I know that TSM 5.2 is supported on Win2003, but I've never talked to anyone who has
done the upgrade in place to Win2003, rather than a new install on Win2003.
Any gotchas?
Thanks
Wanda Prather
"* I/O,
I know this has been addressed many times, I have read the list archives on the subject, plus I've read both the Admin Guide and the Admin Ref. I'm still slightly confused on defining a NEW Devclass for primary tape pools.
The following is our current Devclass -CART3590 (3590b drives, 3590J tape
In the 'old days', it non-Enterprise was limited to 18 slots and 2 or 3
drives. It may have changed. You could have the hardware there, but TSM
would just not use it. Getting the 'Enterprise' license also now days
allows DRM if I remember correctly.
-Original Message-
From: David E Ehre
Remember this a few days ago...
Charlie H - Tecsys Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Hurtubise
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:55 PM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: RE: TSMLVSACACHE files & Win2003
Ref TSM Win2003 Clients 5.3.2.1, 5.3.2.4
I've just been through this on Win
Moses,
The relocate dialog box could be empty if the meta
data objects have migrated to tape and you have the
checkbox turned off for waiting for tape mounts for file info.
(The default is off.) If this happens, it may also mean that
you should revisit your management class information.
You should
The load, in my experience, takes about half the time as the unload.
Since all the work is done on the unload, I still don't understand why a
load takes so much longer than a restore.
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Yuhico, Alexandra wrote:
> thank you daniel.
> in that case i may as well push through wit
Andrew,
We faced the same problem in our shop and found out that there was a
patch from microsoft we needed to get everything working OK. Take a look
here : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;833167
and you'll be saved !
Cheers.
Arnaud
Done this and finally got it to work.
One question I would like to ask though is that what would cause the
relocate dialogue box to be empty ?
this may have been the reason for my problems yesterday.
Is it also correct that after restoring the full backup you then need to
restore the diffs one by o
I was wondering if anyone else has had this problem.
I have multiple windows 2003 servers that have TSM clients on them
ranging from 5.2.1.1 to 5.2.3.0 backing up to a AIX 5.1 server with TSM
server version 5.2.1.1. When the incremental backup starts the first
thing that it starts with is the Syste
The final destination may not have changed...but the steps to get there
sure did.
I'm glad you asked this question, Dale; I'd found another location
(http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/index.jsp) but it
doesn't have manuals for the different versions. We have plenty of stuff
not at
Matt,
Send : SET ADSM-L REPRO as message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers.
Arnaud
**
Panalpina Management Ltd., Basle, Switzerland, CIT Department
Viadukstrasse 42, P.O. Box 4002 Basel/CH
Phone: +41 (61) 226 11 11, F
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/IBMTivoliStorageManagerforWindows5.2
.2.html
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.i
tstorage.doc/welcome.htm
-Original Message-
From: Dale Jolliff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 October 2004 14:10
To:
Hallo,
Does anyone know the command to send to enable sending of my own
messages to me?
Thanks,
Matt.
___ Disclaimer Notice __
This message and any attachments are confidential and should only be read by those to
whom they are addressed. If you
I think that is a question that only your sales rep could answer. And if
they told me I could get buy wity only using 3 slots, I'd want that in
writing!
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/20/2004 12:29:12 PM >>>
G'day all
We are looking into expanding the library a couple more slots,
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dale Jolliff
>I just went to the IBM/Tivoli website to get a copy of a
>manual, and the location where I used to find all the product
>manuals in one place is no longer there.
>
>Has IBM once again improved the website into use
I just went to the IBM/Tivoli website to get a copy of a manual, and the
location where I used to find all the product manuals in one place is no
longer there.
Has IBM once again improved the website into uselessness?
Anyone know how to find the link with the Indexed product manuals?
Does anybody know when TSM server will run on AIX 5.3?
Bill Mansfield
Nancy - Whenever you see strange characters, expect Unicode.
That is, your dsmadmc session to query the Activity Log is not
using the same character code page as the platform which is initiating
the timed sessions, so your admin session can't make sense of the name.
Probably a Windows clien
Hello,
Background info.
TSM Version 5.2.3
AIX operation system 5.1.5.
I started seeing these errors in my activity log past couple of days? This
admin id was not registered(obviously from the text) We had bounced our
server yesterday for maintenance on our library, I thought it might clear
up
On Oct 21, 2004, at 4:39 AM, PAC Brion Arnaud wrote:
Tried to search IBM's site for that info, without success ... Could
anyone tell me if an old TSM server Version 4.1 is compliant with LTO2
tape drives ? ...
Arnaud - Under the "Ultrium 2" entry in ADSM QuickFacts, I note:
TSM support of
I'm interested too.
Yiannakis
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Sandra
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDP Oracle Restore
Great !!! Pawel.
Yes please do send me the script and
Great !!! Pawel.
Yes please do send me the script and other procedures that you are using.
My scenario is to backup database on live machine and restore it on the backup
machine on daily basis.
1- How do I know the backupset number, as when i used tdposync, it shows the dbf
files
unfortunately no response yet. Luckily, my DBA's went into something and there
are corrupted data blocks in database which failed the database backup. so
tuntil they are fixing i mtrying to find out the restore procedure.
Regards,
sandra
Yiannakis Vakis wrote:
> Sandra,
> did you get an answer t
A customer wants to do Lotus Domino backups using TSM + TDP. They also
want to encrypt their Domino backups. The Domino servers will be on
Windows 2003 soon.
It seems that most other Backup products (and their Domino agents)
support encryption for the Domino data saved to tape.
TSM apparently sup
>Question is :
>when i go about restore, how would i know which backup is being restored..
the
>active backup?? what would i need to do to restore any inactive backup??
Hello
As far as I know "rman" always uses the latest available backupsets, and
there is no official and supported way to restore
Hi gang,
Tried to search IBM's site for that info, without success ... Could
anyone tell me if an old TSM server Version 4.1 is compliant with LTO2
tape drives ? If yes, should I use latest version of Atape driver, or
something older ?
Thanks in advance.
Cheers.
Arnaud
*
Sandra,
did you get an answer to this question ? I saw your posting and I was
waiting to see if anyone would reply because I have the same question.
If you found out the procedure can you please let me know ?
Thanks
Yiannakis
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL
Richard,
I've faced this kind of problem before, and the only way I found getting the password
validated was to delete the (already) stored passwords from the client. This can be
made by deleting all files located under /etc/security/adsm.
Then you'll get to reinitialize them, whether using tdpi
53 matches
Mail list logo
