Thimoty,
The 'wait=yes' is required to make sure that the process is started in the
foreground. If it is started in the background, the processes will be started
in parallel even with the SERIAL parameter in the script. I found this out
using it in a script that started multiple exports. As an
- Original Message -
From: "bosco_petersnz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:03 PM
Subject: [MonasticLife] New liturgy website launched...
> Greetings in the Risen Christ
>
> I have recently launched a new website:
>
> www.liturgy.co.nz
>
> I am
- Original Message -
From: "Ordice Gallups STS OblSB +" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 11:27 AM
Subject: [The Benedictine Way] FW: Catholic Calendar - Tuesday, April 25,
2006
>
>
> The Catholic Calendar Daily List
>
> Tuesday, April 25, 2006
>
>
Message
- Original Message -
From: Richard
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 2:35 PM
Subject: [The Benedictine Way] Voice of the Saints: St. Fidelis of Sigmaringen
Woe to me if I should prove myself but a half-hearted soldier in the service of
my thorn-crowned Captain
On a somewhat related note, be careful, the new default for collcation when
creating a new storage pool is "GROUP". With V5.2 and earlier it was "NO". Now
with V5.3 it is effectively "NODE" until you create your first group as Andy
mentions.
K
Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Also see IC47952 and IC49045.
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/s
Geoff,
You get collocation by node.
If you look up the syntax for DEFINE STGPOOL, you'll see some text for the
COLLOCATE option that hints at this:
--
If you specify COLLOCATE=GROUP but do not define any groups, data is
collocated by node. Similarly, if you specify COLLOCATE=GROUP and yo
I have yet another question as it relates to collocation by group. If the
disk storage pool is set to collocation by group, and some nodes are not
assigned to a group, how do those nodes data end up? You would think
intermixed with other nodes, at least that is what I thought. The reason I
am askin
Anyone else care to pitch in an Informix opinion? It would much
appreciated. It is obvious to me that TSM is not the booger here, but
somehow it keeps ending up in my court. Too bad it's not Night Court,
I'd send in Bull Shannon...
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Yes, it is common for the APAR to be closed before the fix is out.
You can either wait for 5.3.3.1 to come out, or you can contact Tivoli
Support and see if they have a test fix available.
Sometimes they will make a test fix available and are glad to have
people willing to test it.
Or they may not
I've had problems lately getting reclamation to run on a particular
tape. It has also resisted efforts to manually do a "move data" on it,
throwing out the errors listed below...
ANRD pvrgts.c(3007): ThreadId<63> Invalid read call
for volume LWO411.(SESSION: 8558, PROCE
Hello all,
I have a question regarding the 5.3 Migrate Command I have the
command set up for
Migrate stgpool backuppool lowmig=0
>From what I read this command cannot be used with automatic
migration. I am assuming they mean it cannot run at the same time as
automatic migration?
Also, I have Ho
Hi Steve,
See my responses below:
> TSM Server 5.2.2.0 & 5.2.4.3 on AIX
>
> 1. Is there a way of finding out the TDP version without going into each
> client and bringing up the gui? From my Q NODE command, it is showing
> me the client version of the BA client even when I am selecting the TDP
>
1) DON"T use windows client 5.3.0. Get a 5.3.2 or 5.3.3 client.
2) In my experience, when TSM says the Windows directory is corrupted,
it really is.
If upgrading the client doesn't change anything, run some diagnostics on
that Windows filesystem.
(I always tell customers they get a "free directo
Hi Otto!
Checkout ftp://ftp.storsys.ibm.com/devdrvr/AIX/Atape.fixlist
Ultrium 3 support was added in level 9.0.1.0.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Otto Schakenbos
Sent: vrijdag 21 april 2006 19:57
To:
Any one seen this before?
We just started backing up a new windows file server. The windows
client is 5.3.0
Our TSM server is AIX 5.3 ML03 TSM server 5.3.1
We're getting the following error in the dsmerror.log file on the client
node.
The Windows client (hqfile -- servername) is scheduled to
I am just installing TSM Space Manager (HSM) on an AIX machine. Though this
will not be an HACMP install, the README states that only JFS2 can be used in
an HACMP environment...
-Jeff
http://www.smdc.org
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Due to new naming policy a customer needs to change the names of the
policy domains. I know you cannot do that directly.
If I just run a copy domain and then update each node for new domain,
will be any damage to old backups regarding their retention?
Management classes and everything inside the do
Hi,
Is there anybody using HSM (TSM for Space Mgmt) in HACMP environment?
Which file systems jfs or jfs2?
What is your experience about HSM in HACMP environment?
Regards
Yashwant Rane
Check with your email admin and make sure the account is setup. Had the
same problem on my end.
Bob Martoncik
Lucas County Information Services
419-213-4633
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/24/2006 8:39 AM >>>
I have TSM's reporting tool installed, Version 5 release 3 level 3.0.
Everything works fine exc
Try using the IP address of your mail server ( or you may have a mail relay
going on which you may need to specify ). Check to see if you can telnet to the
mail server on port 25 from a DOS prompt to see if you can establish
connectivity with the mail server.
I had problems trying to email the
I have TSM's reporting tool installed, Version 5 release 3 level 3.0.
Everything works fine except I can not email the reports.
When I attempt to email the report I receive the following messages:
Email was not sent to one or more recipients
Reason: Error - Failed to connect to SMTP server
Any su
Sorry if I wasn't clear Richard
The intent is that no session can be initiated from the box in the
DMZ to any address inside the firewall.
Sessions can be initiated from inside the firewall to the the box in
the DMZ, then the DMZ box can reply to those sessions.
I think the idea is that there ar
On Apr 23, 2006, at 8:54 PM, Steven Harris wrote:
I have a new client with a requirement that a box in the DMZ have no
open ports through the firewall.
"We can do that" I said, and set up the node with
SessionInitiation=serveronly and a defined IP address and port. ...
Steve - That sounds lik
24 matches
Mail list logo
