Error restoring db2 tablespace

Hi list, I am getting the following error when trying to restore a particular tablespace using the "point in time recovery" using the command line: db2 => RESTORE db TJ tablespace ( TS4K_ADM_01 ) use tsm taken at 20060724024813 SQL2542N No match for a database image file was found based on the

Re: Reclamation processing behavior

They should both appear as ATL's to Tivoli. The real tape is a Qualstar, with AIT Drives and Media, and the VTL appears as a Quantum, With DLT Drives and media. And Both are defined as primary sequential storage pools. I would expect the behavior to be the same. -Original Message- From: AD

Re: Reclamation processing behavior

>>This really isn't a problem, but I was just curious if anyone knows why Tivol >>treats the two types of storage pools differently. >From TSM's point of view, why do you think they are 2 different "types" of >storage pools? Aren't they both sequential tape devices, from the TSm >server's poi

Linux Cluster Backups

I haven't found any docs on backing up Linux Clusters. I've done W2K and Netware Clusters with no problem per docs. New system we have is: RHEL 4 AS u3; Red Hat Cluster Suite 4; GFS 6.1. Cluster disks are Fibre connected to IBM DS8100 and DS4800. Using TSM client 5.3.2. Do I simply follow the

Reclamation processing behavior

I have recently added a Virtual Tape Library to my TSM 5.2.6 Windows server. And have noticed that TSM starts reclamation differently for the Primary storage pools on the VTL than it does for the Primary Storage pools on my tape library. (sequential storage pools on both) Reclamation is normally s

Re: Using tsm-encryption and want to change the hostname at the Client

Rainer, You need to make TSM client prompt you for encryption key password on the next backup after you changed the hostname. The only way to do this is to rename/remove the existing TSM.PWD file (this is the file where TSM client stores its passwords). You should rename this file rather than dele

Re: select total data owned by a username?

Alexander - There's no way to produce a by-user space consumption report. TSM maintains aggregate statistics by Node, but not Owner; and you can't get file sizes from the server in order to sum for a total. Note also that the Filespaces table contains client file system levels, not TSM storage s

Re: Test before upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3

Hi ! I have done a similar test before. If you want, you can install the actual packages that you have 5.2.6.7 on the test machines You can create volumes with dsmfmt command for log and db. You will need the same or more space for the TSM database. Then you must format those volumes using t

Re: select total data owned by a username?

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 07/25/2006 09:15:39 AM: > TSM 5.3.1 on win2K server. Isn't there a way to get the total data (MB) > used by a username on all of the filespaces in a database? I'm thiking > something like: > > select sum(capacity) filespace * where username=dudeman > > But that d

Re: Test before upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3

It looks like you do not have a valid dsmserv.dsk file. This is the location dsmserv looks to to find out where its db and log files are. Look at your existing dsmserv.dsk file to see the syntax. Orville L. Lantto Glasshouse Technologies, Inc. From: ADSM:

select total data owned by a username?

TSM 5.3.1 on win2K server. Isn't there a way to get the total data (MB) used by a username on all of the filespaces in a database? I'm thiking something like: select sum(capacity) filespace * where username=dudeman But that doesn't work because there is no username flag in filepsace table. Must

Test before upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3

Hi ! I'm a TSM newbie and going to migrate our TSM server (AIX) from level 5.2.7.3 up to 5.3.3. Before that I'll test the upgrade (especially database upgrade) using a copy of our existing database (160GB). I copied the db and log volumes (only 1st copy) from our halted server to another (test) m

Re: Drive state is "UNKNOWN" (SOLVED)

Thanks! The path was off-line... I brought the path to the drive on-line. TSM took awhile but it used the drive last night successfully Thanks to all for responding so quickly! Dave Zarnoch Nationwide Provident [EMAIL PROTECTED]