>> On Wed, 23 May 2007 14:50:48 -0500, "Rushforth, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
> I hate to mention other products on a TSM list but since you asked...
> It was Microsoft's DPM 2006 - Administrator recovery - this is a file
> level restore.
Is that restoring a full, a diff, some of both?
I am using it on TSM 5.3.4 on z/OS R7
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tim Brown
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:41 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM 5.3.3 ADMIN WEB INTERFACE
Thanks, I am runnning on Z/OS, dont think it
ftp://index.storsys.ibm.com/tivoli-storage-management/tools/
In that directory are directories for:
MVS
UNIX (includes AIX, HP-UX, Linus, Solaris)
Windows
...
-Tom
>>> Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/23/2007 5:41 pm >>>
Thanks, I am runnning on Z/OS, dont think it will work
Tim
- Origina
Thanks, I am runnning on Z/OS, dont think it will work
Tim
- Original Message -
From: "Kelly Lipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: TSM 5.3.3 ADMIN WEB INTERFACE
I only did this on TSM Windows...
Kelly J. Lipp
VP Manufacturing & CTO
STORServ
I only did this on TSM Windows...
Kelly J. Lipp
VP Manufacturing & CTO
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
719-266-8777
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orville Lantto
Sent: Wednesday, Ma
I was unable to install the web interface on a new 5.4 server (AIX), but the
web interface e continued to work on upgraded 5.3 servers.
Is there a method to get the web interface to function on a new 5.4 server?
Orville L. Lantto
Glasshouse Technologies, Inc.
___
ftp://index.storsys.ibm.com/tivoli-storage-management/tools/windows/
The readme describes what to do. Works up to and including TSM 5.4.0.0
per my own testing.
Kelly J. Lipp
VP Manufacturing & CTO
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
719-266-8777
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
I have been told that the admin web interface on a 5.3.3 server can be activated
eventhough it was supposedly not available with 5.3.3
If that is true how is it done
Tim Brown
Systems Specialist - Project Leader
Central Hudson Gas & Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: [EMAIL PROT
We just upgraded from TSM V5.2.7.3 to V5.3.4.2. The TSM ISC software
needs some work ( our e-mail will not work with the words I wanted to
use). We installed the ISC version from the TSM V5.4 media pack which
IBM sent me.
Any word on updates to ISC software?? I am using command line to
complet
I hate to mention other products on a TSM list but since you asked...
It was Microsoft's DPM 2006 - Administrator recovery - this is a file
level restore.
I think a TSM restore from disk would get similar results - I'll have to
try sometime to compare.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist
I'll buy that: what was the application that did the restore? Was it
file-by-file or was there some sort of image restore involved?
Kelly J. Lipp
VP Manufacturing & CTO
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
719-266-8777
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From
On May 23, 2007, at 3:21 PM, Paul Zarnowski wrote:
... LTO2+ has variable speed technology,
which helps, but I think only to a limit. I think there may still be
a point where if the data is being read too slowly, the drive will
stop streaming.
From what I've read, drives can reliably reduce s
Restoring lots of smaller files can be a problem on two fronts. The
other problem, besides the one that Kelly mentioned, comes about when
restoring small files from tape. IF the files are not contiguous on
tape, then TSM will spend time spacing (skipping) down the tape. We
ran some benchmarks o
Has anyone had any luck running TSM on RedHat EL5, specifically with
the GUI? Or does anyone know when/if IBM plans to support this
version of RedHat?
Thanks.
..Paul
--
Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757
Manager, Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521
719 Rho
FYI,
I recently restored 249 GB - 298,801 files (20,318 folders) in 1 hour 41
minutes on a Windows 2003 R2 SP1 server.
==> 177,505 files per hour
(This restore actually wasn't done with TSM but it does show a higher #
of files created per hour than below.)
Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
We are negotiating our license pricing right now. Our client base is
growing significantly, and the price of the client is making management
think they are being taken to the cleaners.
Is there such a thing as a TSM Enterprise Site license? Our IBM reps
are saying they can put together a single
>> On Wed, 23 May 2007 09:27:21 +0200, Dirk Kastens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I never understood why a backup software is being licensed based on
> the number or type of the processors. This would be ok for a
> database or mathematical software but not for a backup software.
When they first mov
I have done some testing on restore times and have concluded that a
Microsoft Windows box can create between 50-60,000 files per hour. No
faster. So I would conclude that your restore time is optimum. Based
on my experience, obviously. If others have more up-to-date information
about file creat
The disk on the client is an UltraSCSI 320 mirrored. The file characteritics
of the client are 50,000 + files. Smaller files, but not a lot.
The client isn't doing anything, just sitting idle waiting for the restore.
To be honest, we're not sure what to expect as far as how long it takes to bac
Yep.
AutoLabel: Yes
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bell, Charles (Chip)
Sent: woensdag 23 mei 2007 17:19
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape checkin
For 3584?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist St
Like a lot of things, autolabel slipped by me. I'll have to wait until there
are no i/o's going to it until I can make the change. Hope my input was worth
your while otherwise... :)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chris McKay
Sent: W
Something, perhaps, like the total amount of data being backed up!
Processor cores? How in the world does that relate to anything in the
backup/restore space?
But let's not get started down that path for, what, the fifth or sixth
time?
Kelly J. Lipp
VP Manufacturing & CTO
STORServer, Inc.
485
-
Residency Announcement: TI-7B62-R01 IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Express
Deployment Guide
Benefits to Resident: Residents will have a chance to work with the latest
version of Tivoli Storage Manager Express, and interact with other product
specialists to share knowledge and experiences. This is al
>> On Wed, 23 May 2007 10:24:35 -0500, "Haberstroh, Debbie (IT)" <[EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]> said:
> I have not been doing TSM very long and have a few questions on the
> audit you are discussing. If I understand correctly, you are going
> back to existing clients and researching their CPU number an
>> On Wed, 23 May 2007 06:17:30 -0600, James Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Does anyone have any general information that they have collected on
> restore time?
General timing information is nearly useless; not really. Some of the
questions I'll ask below will amplify that. :)
> Were tryi
I have not been doing TSM very long and have a few questions on the audit you
are discussing. If I understand correctly, you are going back to existing
clients and researching their CPU number and performance. Don't the existing
clients go by the licensing standard that was in place when they
Yes we have this option set to yes actually. It is a 3584 Library.
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" writes:
>For 3584?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Bos,
>Karel
>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 10:03 AM
>To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>S
For 3584?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bos,
Karel
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 10:03 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape checkin
Hi,
Instead of the 'label libv' you can set the library in ITSM to autolabel
new
Yup. And I am NOT a compliance officer. I'll do best effort, but if IBM
wants accuracy, the software needs to handle it.
And I agree with Dirk ... the curent maintenance/support/licensing
startegy is (and has been since back in the 3.x days) stupid to the
point of incompetence.
Let me propose th
Hi,
Instead of the 'label libv' you can set the library in ITSM to autolabel
new tapes.
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bell, Charles (Chip)
Sent: woensdag 23 mei 2007 16:46
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Ta
Hi,
I need your experience, have the two server IBM AIX 5.3 TL5 SP6 with Cluster
Suite,Cluster version is 4.0 MP4 and use shared filesystem with Volume
Manager,my version the TSM Server is 5.3.5.0 and use Storage Agent identical
version.
The backup is very slow aprox 7MB/s or 3 MB/s using SAN, i
Yes, we use the checklabel=barcode option on tapes that TSM has already
initialized in the past. If they are brand new tapes, we use 'label libvol'.
Pros: 1. Bypassing drives + using waittime=0 = quicker checkin...duh, you
knew that. 2. We did not always have available drives, or one was taken whil
Hi all,
We were told to use the following command to check-in tapes brought back
from the vault: 'checkin libvol 3584lib search=bulk checklabel=yes
status=scratch waittime=0
I have also checked in tapes using the checklabel=barcode option (usually
only when checking in brand new tapes), which byp
Thanks for the suggestion, but it doesn't work.
I copied the dsmreg.sl from a 5.3 Linux server and now I get:
05/23/2007 08:30:25 ANR9640E Unable to load procedure address
from shared library dsmreg.sl license module.
My question is, if this seems to be a known and growing issue, why hasn't
IBM
On May 22, 2007, at 10:24 PM, Paul Dudley wrote:
We perform incremental backups each night and occasional archive
backups
on our mail server (which is linux OS)
I am currently performing a point in time restore via the GUI for an
account on that mail server. The point in time is last Friday mor
Paul,
you'd see this behaviour when restoring using the "-todate"-option
instead of "-pitdate".
If the GUI doesn't bring the desired results, also try the CL-client.
Good luck,
best regards,
Michael
Am 23.05.2007 um 04:24 schrieb Paul Dudley:
We perform incremental backups each night and occ
Does anyone have any general information that they have collected on restore
time?
Were trying to do a restore, and but we're not sure what to expect, and we
don't have anything to compare it to.
We are currently restoring 8.17GB to a Windows 2003 server.
The client is running on IBM x345 hardw
On May 22, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Schneider, John wrote:
Is IBM listening, I hope? IBM's licensing strategy should be
greatly simplified, or based on something that the TSM client itself
could track and report.
It absolutely should!
Here is a major technology company, telling its customers
Hi,
Justin Miller wrote:
Not to rain on your parade or anything but in talking to my IBM rep she
told me that the licensing strategy is indeed changing with the 5.4
release but not for the better in my opinion. Now instead of basing it on
the number of CPU's that you have, it will now be based
39 matches
Mail list logo
