Hi All
I'm trying to do a ballpark pricing of a back-of-the-envelope TSM design
for someone. Its night here and there are no pricing resources
available. Of course they want it tonight.
Can anyone tell me what list is for a TS3500-L53 a D53 and an IBM LTO4
tape drive?
Thanks
Steve.
Well, given this from IBMSubCap:
ILMT can only be used to determine the number and types of processor cores for
TSM's PVU-base licensing on the managed servers via a manual effort. In other
words, ILMT won't see the TSM code on the TSM managed server, but if you know
the servers that TSM is
Got a strange one. TSM client 5.4.1.2 on Windows2003 running Oracle 11. The
admin used to have an Exclude.DIR for the Oracle archive log directory and
now wants to back it up. He removed the Exclude.DIR and added an Include to
bind to a different management class, but nothing would back up. The
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:55:39 -0400, Kauffman, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
All I want is a simple script, blessed by IBM/Tivoli, that can be
run non-disruptively and on demand that will return cores/cpus for
the system it runs on. Until then, they're entitled to the best swag
I can come up
If this has a heavy enough footprint to not warrant running on a
workstation or desktop, theres no way on earth I'd allow it on any of
my
servers.
But didn't somebody say that they heard it was going to be mandatory?
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
Anything 'mandatory' should be built in to the TSM product in my opinion. They
already get a ton of information about the servers so how hard can it be to add
cpu's to the node info.
- Original Message -
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Yes..Here's hoping for this in TSM V6
Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
Anything 'mandatory' should be built in to the TSM product in my opinion. They
already get a ton of information about the servers so how hard can it be to add
cpu's to the node info.
- Original Message -
From: ADSM: Dist
Anyone else seeing:
ANR8503E A failure occurred in writing to volume
when writing to a FILE class storage pool volume defined on a Windows
share? This is TSM 5.5, Windows 2003 SP2 on both the sharing system
and the TSM server. Strangely enough, there are no entries in either
the sharing system's
Hi Remco,
It is very easy solve the issue.
If you are using 64-Bits Windows and 64-Bits SQL then are you going to use
64-Bit TDP and 64-Bits TSM BA Client
If you are using 32-Bits Windows with 32-Bits SQL then are you going to use
32-bit TDP and 32-Bit TSM BA Client.
If you are using 64-Bits
You've checked the actlog around the time the error occurred?
You're sure that the volume was not full and no more scratch volumes
could be assigned (maxscratch)? You also checked that the Windows volume
had sufficient space for the volume (initially only the space for the
data in the volume is
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Richard van Denzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've checked the actlog around the time the error occurred?
Nuthin but the ANR8503E and the message that the volume is being set
to readonly.
You're sure that the volume was not full and no more scratch volumes
What kind of storage is the FILECLASS on and how is it connected to the
server (SCSI, SAS, FC)? I also know a case where latency might be an
issue on a lightpath FC of 30km.
Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards,
Richard van Denzel.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Richard van Denzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What kind of storage is the FILECLASS on and how is it connected to the
server (SCSI, SAS, FC)? I also know a case where latency might be an
issue on a lightpath FC of 30km.
The storage is a FC-attached EMC CX700 to a
If this has a heavy enough footprint to not warrant running on a
workstation or desktop, theres no way on earth I'd allow it on any of
my
servers.
But didn't somebody say that they heard it was going to be mandatory?
Fortunately, we don't have anything currently that requires this, nor are we of
Can anyone tell me of any conversion issues going to a TSM Solaris
server on AMD x86 from a v240. Can we just restore the existing
database and keep going?
Thanks
Sam Sheppard
San Diego Data Processing Corporation
(858)-581-9668
As far as I know, if there is a node assigned to a domain on the managed
server, you can't update the domain on the cfg manager and use notify
subscriber to update it on the managed server.
The reason that your domain PD-Adicional works is because tou don't have any
nodes assigned to it,
We are backing up our Oracle 10G database using TSM TDP and LAN Free 5.5.1
clients via a TSM 5.5. server.
We are getting the following error upon restore.
Any ideas?
***log file results **
Recovery Manager: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production on Thu Aug 7 20:45:25
2008
Copyright
It's not just counting cpu's, which isn’t hard via WMI or registry scripting.
The trick is finding out if multi-cores are being used (different pvu units
than single), and if logical procs (e.g. hyperthreading) are included.
You cant even get this info from WMI without a non-public hotfix from
Gajendra Kr. Khera
[Direction Is More Important Than Speed]
Hi,
Please let me know how to check the tape, how many times it is reclaimed in
TSM. And how many times can we use a LTO Gen3 and LTO Gen4 Media??
Regards,
Kiran M
Disclaimer:
This email message (including attachments if any) may contain privileged,
proprietary, confidential
21 matches
Mail list logo
