Thanks for the info. But I want to access client via GUI not command
line(dsmc).So how to do this?
Regards,
Kiran.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Christian Svensson
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:41 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIS
Frankfurt, Germany.
Details can be found on our official recruiting homepage:
http://www.bundesbank.de/download/personal/stellenanzeigen/20090225.it_loesungsarchitekt.php
as well as in the "Frankfurter Rundschau" as of this weekend and the
"Computerwoche" as of the coming
Hi Kiran,
If you want to configure your TSM BA Client to access two diffrent TSM Servers
you just need to create 2 instances in DSM.OPT and DSM.SYS
Ex how the files can look like
>cat dsm.opt
Servername SERVER1
Servername SERVER2
>cat dsm.sys
Servername SERVER1
Nodename SRV1
Passwordaccess
Hi,
I am running two server instances in one server. I want to configure single
BA client to access two servers .
My servers and client are installed on the same server. How to configure the
same?
I have my servers configured on Red hat Enterprise Linux server with TSM
5.5.0 server and BA
OK, everybody's at the latest AIX and TSM 5.5.2. The shared library manager,
NT, now handles CAPEKLIB1 for N1-N6 and has no clients of its own. The
thinking behind this was that NT could be restarted in an instant with nothing
more than the default DB and Log. So NAS clients have to talk to a
Please give your TSM server version & platform when posting, you'll get
better results. I can only assume that "NT" here is a Windows box and you
are running at least TSm 5.4. You also don't say whether you intend to
backup the NAS via Lan-Free or TCP/IP; they are quite different
I don't underst
For years we've lived happily in the situation of TSM instance (and machine) NT
whose only function is to serve as library manager for our 6 production (N1-N6)
and test (N7) TSM. NT controls a TS3500 named CAPEK which has a logical
library (1-01) known to N1-N6 as CAPEKLIB1. So far, everything
I have said it before and I will say it again. If Windows had good hardware
then it would be just fine for TSM. Good Windows hardware cost way more then
middle level AIX hardware. The same is true for Linux running on AMD/Intel.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Ma
I love it when somebody quotes me! Somebody is listening.
I had this discussion with one of our customers yesterday. It really
does/should boil down to the OS experience you have on hand. Does the AIX
platform have more capacity/performance than the best Windows platform? I'm
guessing it pr
>> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:57:37 +0100, Henrik Vahlstedt
>> said:
> Time to quote Kelly...
> "So to me it's either AIX or Windows (yes, you can do a lot of TSM
> on Windows once you get past the bigotry!). Choose whichever one
> you have the most experience with."
Ac! It BURNS usss, nass
This is especially true in AIX on a partitioned P590 or 595.
See Ya'
Howard
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
> Of David Longo
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 7:04 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Alternat
On Feb 25, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Strand, Neil B. wrote:
consider Solaris
Actually I'm considering replacing my Linux TSM server with Solaris -
either SPARC or x86 - predominately because Solaris has a fast TCP/IP
stack, ZFS, and fewer driver issues than on Linux. Has anyone also
moved from Linux
This sounds like you did not turn off the RSM (Windows removable storage
management) service. RSM will take exclusive control of any tape/library
device, so this sounds like a configuration issue.
Library sharing and storage agents is functioning just as advertised on
both Linux, Windows and AIX (
Greetings,
We have 22 TSM servers and 5 Lan-free servers in our environment. AIX
is the host of choice, but we have 6 Windows TSM servers, and 3 of our
Lan-free servers are Windows. The 6 TSM Windows servers are all in
remote offices where we only have Windows support people, and we thought
havin
On Feb 25, 2009, at 18:17 , Thomas, Martin wrote:
I'd tend to agree but on Windows you have two "flavors" of 64bit.
"Real" 64 bit (Itanium, IA-64) and "emulated" (AMD's AMD64/x86-64 or
Intel's EMT64T:)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64
Does someone have experience/metrics on both that w
I'd tend to agree but on Windows you have two "flavors" of 64bit. "Real" 64 bit
(Itanium, IA-64) and "emulated" (AMD's AMD64/x86-64 or Intel's EMT64T:)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64
Does someone have experience/metrics on both that we could compare?
-- Martin
-Original Message-
F
If you GO with Windows use 64bit
Prepared by IBM Attorney - IBM Confidential (Unless indicated otherwise)
Såvida annat inte anges ovan: / Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM Svenska AB
Organisationsnummer: 556026-6883
Adress: 164 92 Stockholm
My bad. You need to concatenate the fields together.
select 'upd vol ' || volume_name || ' acc=readonly' from volumes where
stgpool_name like 'TAPE_NDMP%_OFFSITE'
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Moyer, Joni M
Sent: Wednesday, Feb
Been there...tried to do that..and would never put TSM on a
Windoze box.
Your environment is a big factor in platform decisions.
When we first discussed moving off AIX (yes, I would have loved to have
stayed on AIX but it was decided by higher-ups that AIX was not a
"strategic platfor
the lines (except for the header) are exactly what you asked for, TSM
will ignore the the extra whitespace.
On Feb 25, 2009, at 16:24 , Moyer, Joni M wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I ran this script and it's not outputing it as I would like. It's
actually putting everything in columns as you see below:
Start dsmadmc with the -dataonly=yes parameter.
>>> "Moyer, Joni M" 2/25/2009 10:24 AM >>>
Hi Everyone,
I ran this script and it's not outputing it as I would like. It's actually
putting everything in columns as you see below:
Unnamed[1] VOLUME_NAMEUnnamed[3]
-- --
Put the selected fields togheter, like
select ('upd vol '||volume_name||' acc=readonly') as Command from volumes
Regards
Daniel
Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] för Moyer, Joni M
[joni.mo...@highmark.com]
Skickat: den 25 februari 200
On 25 feb 2009, at 15:57, Moyer, Joni M wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have a script that I have created that provides me with a
particular listing of backup tapes:
select volume_name from volumes where stgpool_name like 'TAPE_NDMP
%_OFFSITE' order by volume_name
I would then like to take the results
Hi Everyone,
I ran this script and it's not outputing it as I would like. It's actually
putting everything in columns as you see below:
Unnamed[1] VOLUME_NAMEUnnamed[3]
-- -- --
upd volN00028 acc=readonly
upd vo
Don't forget the spaces.. you need an ending space on UPD VOL and a
beginning for ACC=READONLY or it will all be lumped together.
select 'upd vol ', volume_name, ' acc=readonly' from volumes where
stgpool_name like 'TAPE_NDMP%_OFFSITE'
You also might need to run SET SQLDISPLAYMODE WIDE or the col
If you are going to consider Solaris or HP for a TSM server, pause
and think when was the last time that these companies participated in a
lovefest? Trying to troubleshoot a driver, hba or performance issue
would be like asking a Nancy Pelosi to throw a birthday party for George
Bush.
Life is
select 'upd vol', volume_name, 'acc=readonly' from volumes where
stgpool_name like 'TAPE_NDMP%_OFFSITE'
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Moyer, Joni M
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:58 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [AD
Hi Everyone,
I have a script that I have created that provides me with a particular listing
of backup tapes:
select volume_name from volumes where stgpool_name like 'TAPE_NDMP%_OFFSITE'
order by volume_name
I would then like to take the results of this script and create another script
that c
Time to quote Kelly...
"So to me it's either AIX or Windows (yes, you can do a lot of TSM on
Windows once you get past the bigotry!). Choose whichever one you have
the most experience with."
//Henrik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Beh
I agree with that up to a point.
"I/O, I/O, it's all about I/O" --- me
The majority of my customers have Windows TSM servers - precisely because
there are more small/medium sites in the world than large ones.
TSM on Windows is very stable and very effective. The only problem I have
with it is
I would stick with AIX as the #1 Choice just because the combo of
hardware and OS are unbeatable for this kind of thing. I've seen
Windows Servers Choke on half the amounts of data I move every day, and
I have yet to even use more than 1% of my proc, or use the swap space on
my AIX box.
Second fro
Hi
Quick question.
Does anyone know how to make TSM become a device for archive logs in MSSQL?
We've got the diff and full backups scheduled by running a command from the
client, but i'm struggling to identify how to drop the logs to TSM on a
frequent basis without setting up a schedule on
Well, IBM did drop support for 32bit Linux! I have 2-servers that can't
run V6.1 due to the hardware not supporting x86_64
"Bos, Karel"
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
02/25/2009 05:54 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Prefe
hi all,
is there any (any) way to monitor backup speed via rman/tdpo/lanfree
method ... i'm really puzzled
here considering "normal" file level backups/transfers are really
transparent and stuff
all i see on storage agent is q ses which tells me how many gigs are
transferred in current session,
wh
On Feb 25, 2009, at 6:10 AM, Wido Moersheim wrote:
Hello,
I have an Archive Storagepool which is backed up to a server at a
distant location. Now a Customer wants to have his archived data to be
backed up to yet another location, offsite. The data will be offsite
for
about five years. This is s
Hello,
I have an Archive Storagepool which is backed up to a server at a
distant location. Now a Customer wants to have his archived data to be
backed up to yet another location, offsite. The data will be offsite for
about five years. This is supposed to be a one-time operation. I expect
that if
Hi,
Use the OS you have the best support for in your shop. In our case we
have ITSM servers running on AIX and Windows.
Regards,
Karel Bos
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Ian Smith
Sent: woensdag 25 februari 2009 11:31
To: ADS
I have it on Windows OS, but i ll migrate it to AIX in the future...
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Remco Post wrote:
> On 25 feb 2009, at 11:30, Ian Smith wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>
> Hi Ian, how's life?
>
>>
>>
>> I am sure this question has been asked many times, however with server
>> and OS deve
On 25 feb 2009, at 11:30, Ian Smith wrote:
Hi
Hi Ian, how's life?
I am sure this question has been asked many times, however with server
and OS development what is the favored OS for TSM v5? I have always
preferred AIX however never been keen on Solaris and am considering
Windows instead.
Hi
I am sure this question has been asked many times, however with server
and OS development what is the favored OS for TSM v5? I have always
preferred AIX however never been keen on Solaris and am considering
Windows instead.
Will v6 be compatible with the Windows platform?
Ian Smith
Hi,
For san transfers with hsm we decide to use storage agent and sanergy.
Sanergy can transfer necessary dataover san.
I've just looked rebook "IBM Enterprise Content Management and System
Storage Solutions: Working Together" and there were described that P8 can
somehow interact whith TSM.
41 matches
Mail list logo
