SV: [ADSM-L] TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems

2010-02-01 Thread Niklas Lundström
<72de89f4100 2012227r3928b9a5o483dd4b925d2b...@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <72de89f41002012227r3928b9a5o483dd4b925d2b...@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: sv-SE Content-Language: sv-SE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: sv-SE Content-Type: text/plain; ch

Re: SV: [ADSM-L] define drive without defining a library

2010-02-01 Thread Mehdi Salehi
the problem of a manual library is that there is no medium changer and so you cannot define a path to the library. correct me if I am mistaken: 1- define library 2- define path for library 3- define drive 4- define path for drive

SV: [ADSM-L] define drive without defining a library

2010-02-01 Thread Anders Räntilä
>Can a tape drive be defined in TSM while it is not controlled by a library? >The syntax of "define drive" needs a library. In TSM a drive is always in a library. You can however define a manual library in which you are the robotics DEFine LIBRary LIBType=MANUAL Anders Räntilä

Re: ORACLE Encryption

2010-02-01 Thread Grigori Solonovitch
I am using InclExcl list for include.encrypt. For example: include * AIX include /.../* FSLPAR05 include /ifns_ifns/.../* DBLPAR05 include /patm_patm/.../* DBLPAR05 include /ptel_ptel/.../* DBLPAR05 exclude.dir /home/oracle/admin/ifns/adump exclude.dir /home/oracle/admin/patm/adump exclude.dir /ho

Re: BMR for Exchange server - Fastback

2010-02-01 Thread Josh Davis
If TBMR is actually Fastback, that's interesting. Fastback is FilesX, a product and company that IBM purchased April 21, 2008. FilesX is a block level filesystem incremental backup product for MS Windows. They can use VSS for 2003 OS and 2005 Exchange/SQL. For older Exchange/SQL it will initi

define drive without defining a library

2010-02-01 Thread Mehdi Salehi
Hi, Can a tape drive be defined in TSM while it is not controlled by a library? The syntax of "define drive" needs a library. Thanks

Re: TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems

2010-02-01 Thread Mehdi Salehi
Niklas, What will happen to TSM for MVS on 2012?

Re: TSM Clients on Red Hat Enterprise Linux

2010-02-01 Thread Josh Davis
Nothing specific to Linux or Redhat. General things: If your TSM server is *NIX, you can increase your TCPWINdowsize to 262144 on the server and use a TCPBUFfersize of 131072. Older Windows will have problems with anything over 63. Enabling jumbo frames also helps with CPU load from network trans

Re: TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems

2010-02-01 Thread Gee, Norman
Learn JCL and batch scheduling. Create linear VSAM files for all TSM pools. Each TSM pool file will be limited to 4GB on a 3390 volume. Forget everything you learn about TSM library manager, most mainframes will have RMM or equivalent to manage the Tape library. Cannot use LTO or DLT tape drives.

Re: ?anyone using TSM to backup Panasus PanFS?

2010-02-01 Thread Josh Davis
You could attach the TSM server to the clustered filesystem and allow it to perform the backup from its own client. This might get you better bandwidth if it's done properly. MEMORYEFFICIENT YES will scan one directory at a time per producer thread. This keeps from eating up all system memory,

Re: ORACLE Encryption

2010-02-01 Thread Mark Yakushev
Hi Fred, To encrypt all files, add the following options to dsm.sys ENABLECLIENTENCRYPTKEY YES include.encrypt /.../* Regards, Mark From: Fred Johanson To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Date: 02/01/2010 06:42 AM Subject:[ADSM-L] ORACLE Encryption We register the TDPO as a distinct client. M

Re: TSM Clients on Red Hat Enterprise Linux

2010-02-01 Thread Werner Korsten
Hi Zoltan, No real issues to date yet. Most of our TSM problems have been due to lack of access to the clients or the firewall settings not being correct (both of these are the responsibilities other teams). I was really just looking for some suggestions for making sure the clients are running eff

Re: DSMADMC running from Target server?

2010-02-01 Thread Eric Vaughn
I figured out the issue instead of server used tcps and it worked. Thanks, Eric >>> PAC Brion Arnaud 2/1/2010 9:47 AM >>> Eric, The "-server" option is just a pointer to a TSM stanza instance in your DSM.SYS configuration file. It is there that you will have to provide the "TCPSERVERADRESS" for

Re: DSMADMC running from Target server?

2010-02-01 Thread PAC Brion Arnaud
Eric, The "-server" option is just a pointer to a TSM stanza instance in your DSM.SYS configuration file. It is there that you will have to provide the "TCPSERVERADRESS" for your target server ... Cheers. Arnaud ** C

ORACLE Encryption

2010-02-01 Thread Fred Johanson
We register the TDPO as a distinct client. Most are on various flavors of UNIX. So where do we put the "include.encrypt". Does it go in the dsmi_opt file or an incleexcl file referenced in that file? The manual isn't very clear. Fred Johanson TSM Administrator University of Chicago 773-70

DSMADMC running from Target server?

2010-02-01 Thread Eric Vaughn
Could someone tell me if I am using incorrect syntax. I am trying to run dsmadmc from my target server in order to query some volumes that may have potential problems. I was getting the error ANS8019E before I added the (-) in front of id and password. After adding (-) I dont get an error, but

SV: [ADSM-L] Running makedamaged on an object when the storagepool doesn'texist??

2010-02-01 Thread Niklas Lundström
I don't think there were any problems deleting the volume, I got rid of it and could remove the whole copypool. -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] För Richard Sims Skickat: den 1 februari 2010 13:28 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Re: [A

SV: [ADSM-L] SV: Running makedamaged on an object when thestoragepool doesn'texist??

2010-02-01 Thread Niklas Lundström
All the volumes from the original copypool are already deleted and the pool is removed , but TSM still have references to it. Storage Pool ID: -3 Volume ID: 38548 Volume Name: *unknown* The volume_id is the internal volumename in TSM, it has nothing to to with the tape-label. So since the Volu

Re: Running makedamaged on an object when the storagepool doesn'texist??

2010-02-01 Thread Richard Sims
On Feb 1, 2010, at 3:33 AM, Niklas Lundström wrote: > I've got some objects in my database that points to a volume that does not > exist anymore > but TSM still think it does... The obvious question: What happened when you attempted Delete Volume Discarddata=yes ?

SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems

2010-02-01 Thread Niklas Lundström
<7cfcaf1d35809d4491c6bc48615ced2c2827612...@fspas01ev012.fspa.myntet.se><7 2de89f41002010244v30bda147g958e690f99414...@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <72de89f41002010244v30bda147g958e690f99414...@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: sv-SE Content-Language: sv-SE X-MS-Has-Attach:

Re: SV: [ADSM-L] TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems

2010-02-01 Thread Mehdi Salehi
I mean TSM 5.5 for z/OS

SV: [ADSM-L] TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems

2010-02-01 Thread Niklas Lundström
Hello TSM 5.5 was the last version for MVS. Are you meaning that you are running a TSM server in USS? Is that even possible, I thought that the only way to run TSM 6.1 on a mainframe was to use a Linux LPAR and use z-Linux Regards Niklas -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: ADSM: Dist Sto

SV: Running makedamaged on an object when the storagepool doesn'texist??

2010-02-01 Thread Christian Svensson
Hi Niklas, What's happening if you put the tape as destroyed? and do a restore media to reproduce that data so you can expire the information as normal? Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Supported Platfo

TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems

2010-02-01 Thread Mehdi Salehi
Hi, How much mainframe knowledge is necessary for an experienced TSM admin for open systems to maintain TSM server for z/OS? I mean using Unix System Services (USS) and the web-based administration center. thanks so much

Running makedamaged on an object when the storagepool doesn'texist??

2010-02-01 Thread Niklas Lundström
Hello I've got some objects in my database that points to a volume that does not exist anymore but TSM still think it does and that gives me a lot of errors when I'm running expiration An audit of the DB would solve these problem but the db is too big to do that in a reasonable time. An ex