Hello SAM,
as far as I remember, the 3494 has the feature to assign different
categories for each media during the checkin process. As example, the 3590
media use a scratch category of 301 (private 300), the 3592-JA a scratch
category of 401 (private 400, WORM 402) and 3592-JB a scratch
Hi Stefan,
I guess there is a developer works article on this topic, eg.:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/Tivoli+Storage+Manager+Version+6+Hybrid+Upgrade+Migration+Method
Upgrade can be achieved with a downtime of less than an hour when using a
new system or
Hi,
This is probably a question from Del.
My environment is following
TSM Server: 6.1.3.1 on Windows Server 2008 R2
Client Level: 6.1.3.0 and TDP version 6.1.1.0
Exchange version: 2003 with SP2
But is it possible to force a Exchange restore in MS Exchange TDP?
When I open the TDP for Exch, then
Christian,
It seems the backup may not have completed successfully.
There is not enough information here to know the answer.
Please open a problem with IBM service.
They will be able to examine the TSM Server objects
and DP/Exchange trace and tell you for sure.
Thanks,
Del
Hi TSM-ers!
One of our servers have database corruptions. An audit of a copy of the
production database restored on our test environment revealed them.
Since we do not know the impact of these errors (can all client data be
restored, can I restore all primary volumes in case of a restore
stgpool?)
On May 20, 2010, at 12:08 AM, Sam Wozniak wrote:
Your email filtering settings are set too stringent. You changed my life and
I will no longer be a participant of the adsm mailing list. I bet this email
also gets blocked according to your wonderful filtering and banning settings.
Go to Edit - Preferance to setup VMware VCB-II (vStorage)
Best Regards
Christian Svensson
Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se
Skype: cristie.christian.svensson
Supported Platform for CPU2TSM::
http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms
Marist College observes Barracuda Reputation to block known spam
sites: it has to protect itself due to the ever increasing amount of
spamming that is going on. I know because I've had my postings
blocked. :-)
Spammers gain control of computer systems because of short, easily-
guessed
Eric,
I ran into a similar problem 2 years ago - Corrupted DB.
Fortunately, I had a spare server that I quickly set up and moved all
backup operations to that server. It took a few days to run through the
DB fixes on the corrupt server. After the DB was fixed, I just did
server-server exports
Hi Neil!
It may be able to handle the load, but I don't have the storage capacity
on the backend on this server.
When you direct the backups to the other server, all BA clients
basically start all over again with a 'full' backup and I don't have
that capacity on the spare server...
Thank you very
Back when we had a 3494 with two types of tapes, we controlled who wrote to
what by making two separate devclasses. One type of tape was all explicitly
defined volumes to one of the devclasses, the other type of tape were used as
scratch tapes in the other devclass.
David
Sheppard, Sam
Rather than start with an empty server B, start with a copy of your corrupted
database as server B. While you are running the audit on server A, direct
your backups to server B. Hopefully the exports you do after the audit on
A completes from B back to A will work, without importing any
I think your reasoning is sound and will work.
Not sure why you would need to kill housekeeping on the prod server; why
not let it continue to run? You'll still want your copypool tapes
created for those 4 days of the audit.
Depending on your total daily volume, and if you have GIGE network
If you go with the T950 avoid SAIT drives. I'm not sure if SpectraLogic
still offers SAIT as an option, but we had all sorts of problems with
them. You might also want to go with direct-attached FC drives rather
than use the QIPs (SCSI-to-FC bridges for up to four drives) as the QIPs
can make
Thanks Margaret!
Clark, Margaret wrote:
Policy domains view policy domains modify policy domain client node schedules
modify schedule client nodes associate client node
- Margaret Clark
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Hi Wanda!
You don't want tapes to be reclaimed and you definitely don't want
pending tapes to become scratch during the audit on the other system.
When I restore the fixed database on the production server, it will
otherwise try to reclaim volumes which contain other, newer data.
Kind regards,
As of the 6.1 AdminCenter, you can also do the following to Associate a
node to a backup schedule.
In the navigation tree, click Client Nodes and Backup Sets
Locate the node in the table of nodes (filtering can be used)
Right-click the node
Select Modify Client Node...
Select the Schedules tab
Thanks for your response Harry!
Harry Husfelt wrote:
As of the 6.1 AdminCenter, you can also do the following to Associate a
node to a backup schedule.
In the navigation tree, click Client Nodes and Backup Sets
Locate the node in the table of nodes (filtering can be used)
Right-click the
My answer would be, it depends. Depends on how much preparation you do ahead
of time. Depends on if you are staying on the same box or moving to a new box.
Depends on the size of the box. A couple different variables could change the
total time.
I just upgraded a 5.5 TSM server on AIX
On 20 mei 2010, at 17:02, Loon, EJ van - SPLXM wrote:
Hoi Paul!
Thank you very much for your reply!
I have an PMR open for several weeks, but Level 2 can't help me any
further too. They said If it doesn't bother you during daily
operations, just ignore the corruptions. The problem is that I
20 matches
Mail list logo
