Data Protection for SQL 5.3.3 was only released in the x64 version.
Adding x64 support was the sole purpose of that special release.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 08/18/2010
03:25:05 PM:
>> From: "Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,I
For a very special circumstance we need TDP for SQL 5.3.3 32bit. We found an
IBM doc that referenced it, but we can only find the 64bit version. Did or
does the 32bit version exist?
Andy Huebner
This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally
privileged. If you ar
See past discussions on electronic vaulting in the archives
(http://www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/).
Cloud backup is also a thing now, but probably too new for there to be a lot of
experience.
A challenge with any remote backup scheme is enough network power to handle all
the data, wh
You might do some research on hosting.com I think they might provide the
type of service that you are looking for.
This is not a recommendation, I just happened to see them at a symposium
a couple of weeks ago,
Don't know if they are good or not.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
Our long-term goal is to get rid of tapes altogether. Currently we utilize
IBM TSM 5.4 to backup nodes to a disk based storage pool. We then backup
the storage pool to LTO3 tapes, which are latter vaulted offsite. We would
like to backup the storage pool directly to an offsite disk based solutio
The IBM Tivoli Product Introduction team is going to be running an
exciting early customer program for an upcoming release of
IBM Tivoli Storage FlashCopy Manager.
This program will consist of an Early Customer Program
during which development runs web conferences to present
the design of new feat
Agreed, I noticed this also Shawn
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Shawn Drew
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 10:19 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] cancel a session with MediaW
They did change the way t
Hi Rick,
I'm not using TSM OR (which is TSM 5.x), but TSM Reporting & Monitoring
(which is for TSM 6.x). I know that TSM OR still can access TSM 6.x but
the reports are getting garbled somewhat.
Eric has answered that it is on the future feature list of TSM R&M, so
I'll guess I have to wait.
Met
They did change the way this operates after TSM 5.3 although I can't
remember precisely which version.
It was changed by at least 5.5.2
I've noticed processes finishing much more quickly when I cancel them.
For example, if a Migration is working on a big 800GB file and I tried to
cancel the proces
Richard, not enough info for a concise answer, but on WIN servers open
the management console, in the Op Rep. properties there is an "E-mail
Account" tab where you enter the information pertinent to your mail
system. Next add your TSM server to the management console, navigate to
Reports>Operationa
Some time ago I posed this question to IBM and as I understand it their
response was that an active session will not cancel until it complete
its current task. For example, if a process or session has requested a
tape/volume and you issue a command to cancel the session and/or process
TSM will queu
Hi Richard!
I read somewhere that this is on the future features list. I'm currently
sticking to TSMOR for this reason.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard van Denzel
Sent:
On Aug 18, 2010, at 5:57 AM, Richard Sims wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2010, at 5:54 AM, Mehdi Salehi wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>> stg1 has stg2 as copy pool and they are synced. If you set the copystg of
>> stg1 to null, why stg2 still has copy data of stg1? Why doesn't TSM
>> delete/expire the copy data?
To me removing the copystg value of a pool meant losing the pointer to copy
storage pool data.
Thanks
Hi All,
I've been searching but did not find it yet. In the old Operational Reporting
it was possible to mail the report to you (or a bunch of people).
Does anyone know to do this for TSM R&M, and if so how?
Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards,
Richard van Denzel.
On Aug 18, 2010, at 5:54 AM, Mehdi Salehi wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> stg1 has stg2 as copy pool and they are synced. If you set the copystg of
> stg1 to null, why stg2 still has copy data of stg1? Why doesn't TSM
> delete/expire the copy data?
Because it should not, according to the architecture.
Th
Hi,
how to cancel a session with media wait in a manual library? "can sess" does
not work. TSM keeps the waiting session even if you restart the client node.
(TSM server 5.3 in AIX 5.3) The session will die after the 60 minutes of
timeout.
Thanks
Hi everyone,
stg1 has stg2 as copy pool and they are synced. If you set the copystg of
stg1 to null, why stg2 still has copy data of stg1? Why doesn't TSM
delete/expire the copy data?
Thanks
Hum sorry, i think i don't write exactly what i mean :)
in fact, we'll buy a new hardware, and then we'll install TSM 6 on it.
We must after connect it to actual storages which stores filepool and diskpool
(SAN disk IDB DS4200)) and a library (Overland NEO2000).
Last transfert "local" data and
19 matches
Mail list logo
