I actually restored the files to my workstation, and the network settings are
fine
Duplex mismatch does not cause the speed to go down to modem-speed from 1995
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] För Remco Post
Skickat: den 7
Well I started the restore and went home, so I don't know how many mounts it
did, but the data was on 3 tapes
09/04/2010 11:34:41 ANR1182I Removable volume 006811 is required for a restore
request from session 2060. (SESSION: 2060)
09/04/2010 11:34:41
What sort of tape drives/library is it? It isn't some sort of de-dup'ed
library (non-IBM) is it?
regards,
Mark
From: Niklas Lundström niklas.lundst...@swedbank.se
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Date: 07/09/2010 04:45 PM
Subject:SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h
Hi there
To begin with, TSM as a product has no issues with fast restores. If the data
isnt placed correctly, restores might slow up though.
- Did you restore files or files and directories?
- Are you storing directories on tape or in a dedicated diskpool using DIRMC?
- Considering it was only
It's Jaguar 3 drives, so the problem isn't there...
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] För Mark Blunden
Skickat: den 7 september 2010 08:56
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Ämne: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in
Directories are on a dirmc diskpool. Actually I only restored few directories,
and the files
were all in the last sub-directory.
On this particular server that is big the data isn't collocated.
We collocated by group and this server isn't in any group.
There were only 3 tapes involved, and
There is a ~30minute delay between the start of the restore and the first
mount, did you have drives free for this restore?
09/04/2010 11:34:42 - 09/04/2010 12:07:32
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] Namens Niklas
Lundström
Hi,
I'm sorry, but you are wrong, duplex mismatch Does cause the speed to drop to
Aboutaleb 5K/s. I've Deen Thissen on numerous occasions.
--
Gr., Remco
On 7 sep. 2010, at 08:02, Niklas Lundström niklas.lundst...@swedbank.se wrote:
I actually restored the files to my workstation, and the
Thanks to Henrik Wahlstedt this got solved.
Henrik, tack för hjälpen och telefonsamtalet, jag har faktiskt inte fått nåt
mail från dig...
Restore processing finished.
Total number of objects restored: 137
Total number of objects failed: 0
Total number of bytes transferred:
Good!
Instead of trying to explain this properly in an email I refer to the author of
adsm quickfacts plus the BA client guide, Classic restore vs No Query restore.
:)
//Henrik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Niklas
Hi
try to disable NQR (-disablenqr=yes)
It will help.
--
Efim
What are the default ports for the webport option?
Tcpclientport is 1501.
I am running into problems on win 2008, and need to know what are the defaults
so as to open up the firewall.
Thanks for the help.
Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310
If anyone has any experience backing up a NetApp metrocluster, I would be
interested in talking to them.
Thanks.
..Paul
--
Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757
Manager, Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521
719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801Em:
Hi
The defaults is webport 0 0 - random ports, so use webport 1552 1553
and if you use CAD open only 1552 port from server to client and 1500
(default) from client to server.
--
Efim
Metroclusters, nothing more than two netapps... nothing special if you want to
do NDMP, just zone your tape drives to both nodes in the cluster.
On 7 sep 2010, at 17:03, Paul Zarnowski wrote:
If anyone has any experience backing up a NetApp metrocluster, I would be
interested in talking to
The port is random unless you define it. You need to allow the program to
listen, once it is allowed to listen it will tell the TSM server what port to
use.
Try this on 2008 and 2008 R2: (use at your own risk, but it is what I use)
netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name=IBM Tivoli Storage
Like the post says, I'm trying to restore a single mailbox from an Exchange
2007 server. Everything up-to-date: client 6.2.1, TDP 6.1.2. I'm pretty sure I
got all the pre-reqs down for a restore, but here's the thing: I can restore a
mailbox in my AD OU, but not in a child domain. TDP restores
I am putting up 2-new Linux based 6.x servers that will eventually replace
older 5.5.x boxes.
My issue/question is should I go with 6.1.4.1 or 6.2.1.1?
Part of the reason for asking this is due to my bad experience with trying
to upgrade a test server from 6.1.3.4 to 6.2.1 - total
Hi,
I am sure everything is configured correct at Niklas site. Test classic vs nqr
restore and you will be suprised.
//Henrik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel
Sparrman
Sent: den 7 september 2010 09:40
To:
Repeat after me: TSM 6.1 is dead! :)
Really, 6.1 is never a good choice, always go straight to 6.2.
--
Gr., Remco
On 7 sep. 2010, at 20:39, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU zfor...@vcu.edu wrote:
I am putting up 2-new Linux based 6.x servers that will eventually replace
older 5.5.x boxes.
My
I'm having a bad memory day. How does a client admin monitor the progress of a
restore run from the command line? Are messages written to a TSM client log
during a restore?
Thank you,
Keith Arbogast
Indiana University
Hi there Henrik
I asked a few questions to try to get a pointer.
Concerning my point on TSM performance, Nicklas was the one saying he had the
organisation complaining on TSM for poor performance. Perhaps you should read
his first message, and you'd understand why I said as I said. Scroll
Remco,
If TSM 6.1 is dead, and everybody should just go to 6.2, then please
respond to the user's posted problem. He was running 6.1 and tried to
upgrade to 6.2.1.1, and had such a miserable failure that he ended up
wiping out all his efforts and starting over. How does he get to 6.2 if
the
I've not yet had the pleasure of upgrading from 6.1 to 6.2. The installer
(deployment engine) is supposed to take care of everything, but I also know
from experience that the DE is not IBM's best product.
Now, as for new installs, or upgrades from version 5, please skip 6.1, and
avoid at least
I'm running Tivoli Storage Manager for Solaris x86_64 Version 5,
Release 5, Level 4.2 on a Sun X4540 Thor. I was at 79.8% DB
utilization:
tsm: TSM1q db
Available Assigned Maximum Maximum Page TotalUsed
PctMax.
Space Capacity Extension Reduction
Keith -
With a CLI interactive session, messages are written to the invoking
terminal; and at least in Unix, that output can be redirected to a
file, or pipe to the 'tee' command. Client sessions invoked via the
scheduler (as via Define Clientaction and Schedmode Prompted) gain the
added
Hi Daniel,
It took a while before this email got published on adsm.org...
However, I read the message and I wanted to address the specific issue not the
general one with people are complaining about restore times, which they often
do.
To me the key sentence was The server has a lot of files,
Some members of the list might find this of interest:
Please join the next New Zealand IBM Storage User Group meeting which will be
held on Sep 14th in Auckland, and 15th in Wellington at 3:30pm. This meeting
will address: TSM, TPC, XIV and SVC.
The agenda for this meeting is as follows:
TSM
28 matches
Mail list logo
