Hi all,
We have some work currently underway to try and get the SharePoint TDP for
TSM (aka DocAve) installed and working. We've downloaded and installed
v6.1.4 from Passport Advantage and have been able to configure and run
successful backups.
However on testing the restore process, it seems tha
Hi,
I was hope to find some light here at the forum.
I have a Windows Server 2003 SP2 with a MS SQL Server 2005 Enterprise installed.
I have installed TSM BA Client 6.2.3.0 and TSM for MSSQL 5.5.5.1 and the TSM
Server version is 6.2.3.0
But when I try to run a backup of our MS SQL Server via GUI
A while back I did some searching in to NFS file pool for LanFree storge
agents. I figured that since Sanergy was using NFS for setup but sending
data across FC, that TSM should have to support NFS directly. I found a
comment in the TSM manuals (v5.5) that IBM does not support NFS for
LanFree ac
Hi Kirk,
Usually the source of this oh-so-informative error message has to do with the
widespread elevation of rights for the Agent user. You might try logging into
the destination db as the account and see if you can create a database.
Also-- if you are doing an in-place restore of a deleted si
Hi All,
TSM 5.5
Nodename node1 (Archive data pre 2010)
Nodename node2 (Archive data post 2010)
Node1 and node2 are the same server, at some point the nodename was
different causing two separate sets of archives.
What I want to do is merge these two together, so that all archive data
is under th
Hi
Instead of merging the nodes before exporting them to the 6.2 server, why dont
you use mergefilespaces feature of the export command?
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
Daniel Sparrman
Exist i Stockholm AB
Växel: 08-754 98 00
Fax: 08-754 97 30
daniel.sparr...@exist.se
http://www.existgruppen.se
There is no function/command set in TSM to merge data from two different nodes.
You can cheat and do it with export/import (convenient you are planning an
export anyway).
You will have to do it when there are no sessions active to either node:
Here are the steps; if you want the data to end up be
A couple of things that I did not see mentioned here which I experienced
was for Data Domain the VTL is an additional license and it does
limit the available mount points (or emulated drives), where a TSM file
based pool does not. Like Wanda stated earlier depends what you can
afford !
I mysel
Hello Tim,
A random storage should be considered as temporary storage. This type of pool
that can accept an almost unlimited number of client, it facilitates backups
sequense
Typically, it must be large enough to accommodate the daily backup.
During the maintenance plan, it must be emptied on a
> and it does limit the available mount points
One of the real benefits of file devices is that they allows multiple
concurrent readers of a volume.
Rick
-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use o
Not really sure where the general idea that a VTL will limit the number of
available mount points.
I'm not familiar with Data Domain, but generally speaking, the number of
virtual tape drives configured within a VTL is usually thousands. Not sure why
you'd want that many though, I always prefer
Is anyone backing up Citrix Xen server? Can you provide details to how
you're doing it or references to documentation?
XenServer 5.6 SP2 and TSM Server 5.5.5.2
I've seen a few posts on this subject but no real replys. Thanks!
~Rick
Jax, FL.
Interesting. Every VTL based solution, including data domain, that I looked at
had limits on the amount of drives that could be emulated which were nowhere
near a hundred let alone a thousand. Perhaps it's time to revisit this.
The license is a data domain fee, and a hefty one at that.
The big
Sorry, By not supported I meant for lan-free. Every bit of documents
I've read only refer to using a physical or virtual tape library.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Allen S. Rout
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 12:55
jpw...@comcast.net
Thanks
The DD has a limit on the number of tape drives that can be configured and
used.
The quote below is from the DD Admin Guide (v4.9):
" Drives?From 1 to 256 tape drives are supported, depending on the
Data Domain model. The DD4xx, DD510 and DD530 systems can
have a maximum of 64 drives. All
When I looked into this subject I found that lanfree supports:
- vtl
- physical tape
- file devices on GPFS (a san filesystem)
- file devices via Sanergy (nfs but with data being sent over fibre
channel)
- I found a specific comment that straight NFS for sharing File devices is
not supported by IBM
I didn't think Sanergy was still supported?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Robert
Clark
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 1:39 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirma
It _was_ some time ago I look into lanfree. Plus, we are still on TSM
v5.5.
Rick
From: "Prather, Wanda"
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 09/27/2011 02:26 PM
Subject:Re: Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary
pool
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
I did
By LANFree, you mean LAN Free to disk?
last time I looked at it, Sanergy was NFS for UNIX hosts, and CIFS for
Windows. (So if you have both platforms in your environment, you needed
two setups.)
If you used NFS for the front-end semantics, you still had some
range-based locking for the shared dis
On 09/27/2011 12:02 PM, Rick Adamson wrote:
The bigger question I have is since the file based storage is
> native to TSM why exactly is using a file based storage
> not supported?
Not supported by what?
If you've got a DD, then the simplest way to connect it to TSM is via
files. Some backu
Just to put an end to this discussion, we're kinda running out of limits here:
a) No VTL solution, neither DD, neither Sepaton, neither anyone, is a
replacement for random diskpools. Doesnt matter if you can configure 50 drives,
500 drives or 5000 drives, the way TSM works, you're gonna make th
The fact you actually need to pay a "VTL license" is just plain scary.
When u bought it, did they think you're gonna use it as a fileserver? I'm not
to specialized into Data Domain, but arent they marketed as backup hardware? So
you get a disk, but if you want to use it for something else than t
On 09/27/2011 02:48 PM, Daniel Sparrman wrote:
When u bought it, did they think you're gonna use it as a
fileserver?
Well, exactly.
I'm not to specialized into Data Domain, but arent they marketed as
backup hardware? So you get a disk, but if you want to use it for
something else than that,
Actually I have more customers using Data Domains without the VTL license than
with it.
With a Windows TSM server, you can just write to it via TCP/IP using a CIFS
share(NFS mount with an AIX TSM server).
If you have sufficient TCP/IP bandwidth for your load, no fibre connections
needed.
>From
25 matches
Mail list logo
