Tsm server 5.5.4.
Windows client 6.3.0
Will the following select show me all backups at and below the designated
subdirectory?
select * from backups where node_name='CASTSTORAGE' AND -
upper(hl_NAME) like '\BIOMECHANICS\DICKIN\FATIGUE STUDY\FATIGUE STUDY'
If not, where have I gone wrong?
Hi Del,
The Backups are working fine but the Exchange guys have come back and said the
service account I use has too much authority within Exchange. How do i define
what the minimum level of access I require within Exchange?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-
Jerome,
As documented in the Data Protection for Exchange User's Guide:
Security requirements for Data Protection for Exchange backup
and restore tasks on Exchange Server 2010
To perform backup and restore tasks on Exchange Server 2010,
Data Protection for Exchange must be operating in an acco
We gave our TSM Exchange Service 'domain administrator' rights. And it works
with the TSM schedules.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del
Hoobler
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 9:29 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L
To get other subdirectories, you'll need to add the wildcard designator %
(without a wildcard, "like" is the same as "=")
upper(hl_NAME) like '%\BIOMECHANICS\DICKIN\FATIGUE STUDY\FATIGUE STUDY%'
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
-Gary Lee wrote: -
>Tsm server 5.5.4.
>
>Windows client 6.3.0
>Will the following select show me all backups at and below the
>designated subdirectory?
>
>select * from backups where node_name='CASTSTORAGE' AND -
>upper(hl_NAME) like '\BIOMECHANICS\DICKIN\FATIGUE STUDY\FATIGUE
>STUDY'
>
>I
One more thing...
My examples assume that the HL_NAME is complete, i.e., it is in the root of
the file system. If \BIOMECHANICS is NOT in the root of the file system,
then you will need to use 'like' in both cases I described earlier, and
prefix the HL_NAME with a '%', like this:
To see all objec
Hi Gary,
If this is a Windows client, you do not need to upper-case the HL_NAME as
long as the actual pattern you specify is in upper case. This is because
file system backups on Windows are always stored in upper case.
The HL_NAME specification should have a terminating backslash.
If you want t
> upper(hl_NAME) like '%\BIOMECHANICS\DICKIN\FATIGUE STUDY\FATIGUE STUDY%'
This is pretty close to what I also responded with. However, it will pick
up entries not only in '..\FATIGUE STUDY', but also in '..\FATIGUE STUDY -
PRELIMINARY' or '..\FATIGUE STUDY2', which might not be desirable.
This i
Hi to all
I notice for this warning on the actlog about a node EXCHSRVA
05/07/2013 17:26:29 ANR0429W (Session: 54758, Origin: EXCHSRVAN_SA)
Session 9887 for node EXCHSRVA (WinNT) refused - maximum server sessions (4)
exceeded. (SESSION: 54758)
I check the opt server
tsm: ADSM2>q opt m
That sounds like a great RFE, one I could have used a couple times in the past.
How can we "vote" on this? I'm not familiar with how to do that with IBM RFEs.
Thanks,
Ben
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Vandeventer, Harold [BS]
I'd also like to vote this up. We're a research organization so we don't
have litigation per se, but there are times when we need to freeze
expiration for other reasons.
-- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu)
-- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
-- Foege Building S046, (206)-
Thanks all. Got it working now.
Forgot the % as all found.
Is this a scheduled session? There is another setting, maxschedsessions,
that controls the percentage of the total sessions that can be scheduled
sessions. If that is set really low (like 2%, seems unlikely now that I
think about it), then that would be the 4 sessions.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:
I agree this is a great RFE, and I have added my vote to it.
Go to http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/?BRAND_ID=90. You will need to
sign in with your IBM ID to vote. Search by RFE ID to go to the desired RFE.
Open the RFE and then click "Add vote" under RFE actions.
_
Got it. Voted. Thanks
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Reese,
Michael A (Mike) CIV USARMY 93 SIG BDE (US)
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 11:01 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM RFE regarding Litigation Hold
I agr
Sure could have used this in the past! Got my vote!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ben
Bullock
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 1:06 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM RFE regarding Litigation Hold
Got it. Voted.
Ditto
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Plair,
Ricky
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 12:52 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM RFE regarding Litigation Hold
Sure could have used this in the past! Got my vote!
-O
We deal with a variety of types of litigation hold here, as well. What you can
do now, easily, is to setup a parallel policy domain (i.e., LITHOLD) that has
all the same management classes, but different retention policy (i.e., retain
forever). Then, to avoid expiration you just have to do thi
Can someone who has a TS300 Service Console (TSSC) please send me the
physical dimensions - e.g. the depth is what we are looking for. All
documentation I find simply says 1U. We are trying to see how shallow of a
rack we can get away with.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Richard Rhodes
wrote:
Great ideas Paul I'm preparing to build the alternate server without
expiration approach as soon as I can scare up some resources.
I'll look at the alternate Domain approach also.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul
Zarn
Hello all,
Back in the early TSM 5 days, or at least once when I went to training, it was
advised that each individual platform had its own DOMAIN for retention and
destination control. Now, since I'm evaluating a TSM v6 environment, I'm
rethinking whether that is necessary across the board.
Sergio,
Having developed some of the early training, way before V5, I can tell you that
the rationale for platform domains was strictly organizational. In those days,
most IT shops were organized by platform and had retention control over their
own systems.
Free of the organizational restri
I work in a large research department, with 31 labs that basically
function as autonomous businesses, along with a few institutes and
centers with their own funding. Of those 31 labs, 13 of them have some
form of dedicated computational resources.
We used to have one big policy domain, with one or
Our approach has been to export/import the node to another TSM instance
under a different node name with a suffix or prefix that indicated the
hold. THe mgt class is set to no-expire.We stop expiration until this
copy is made. This approach has lets the node be processed as usual, and
the cop
Unfortunately we've had expiration holds for tens of terabytes of data,
so we haven't been able to use this approach.
-- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu)
-- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
-- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
-- University of Washington School of Medic
26 matches
Mail list logo
