Hello,
after updating tsm 5.5 db to 7.1 i see on some volumes (all before
offsite volumes reclaimed or deleted from pending status in the last few
weeks)
mismatch.
q volume shows another volume as if you make a select!
as an example B00711l5:
q volume B00711L5
tsm: KBW220_SERVER1>q vol B0
Hello everyone,
I'm beginning to install Tivoli Monitoring for TSM instances on customers'
sites, both 6.4 and 7.1, and I was wondering if anyone doing the same would
like to share experience.
I'm also lacking 7.1 documentation on the subject (except user guide of course)
: latest documentatio
Hello. Need help. thank you to confirm that the TSM terabyte license
supports AIX servers and Orcale database.
Thank you in advance
--
Tivoli Storage Manager Suite for Unified Recovery can be licensed for AIX
servers and does include TSM for Databases (including Oracle).
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Abdelwahed RABBAB
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 7:36 AM
To:
Hello,
what is the status for the support of tsm ve for vmware version 6 ?
André ROY
Analyste de l'informatique et des procédés administratifs
VPTI
Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail
Siège-social, local 180
(418)-266-4646 ext 5402
Parce que le Québec a besoin de tous ses trav
Hello André,
VMware vSphere 6 support for TSM for VE, Data Protection for VMware
is targeted for next month. Standard disclaimers apply.
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/17/2015
09:25:24 AM:
> From: André Roy
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MAR
Hello,
Please see this page :
http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/tsm-suite-for-unified-recovery
and this datasheet :
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=PM&subtype=SP&htmlfid=TID14084USEN#loaded
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
- Mail or
OK, seeing a strange one.
I have a 10 TB DB
Running 6 sessions with multiplexing of 4
Tdp/erp will run at 300 GB/hr/session lan free until only one session
remains. then the through put drops to about 400 MB/hr
So I'm moving a total of 1700 GB/hr until the last 4 multiplexed files into
a single
I've gotten caught in a bill-back hassle with one of our clients.
Quick background:
1. Node1 has backed up their data for years.
2. Node2 was created to back up a new server.
3. Some, but not all, data has been COPIED from the Node1 server to the
Node2 server. Not moved, jus
Don't see the purpose of renaming it--
If you just do:
exclude.dir e:\data
That has the same effect.
It excludes them from backup, the existing backups get marked inactive on the
next backup run, and the countdown clock starts for the number of days to keep
the last version.
If it's a lot of
10 matches
Mail list logo
