Re: TSM 6.2.1 DB

2011-09-01 Thread Andrew Meadows
be safe? As for question 2 i was trying to think out of the box for an easy way to replicate the Db across sites... You are probably right though the restore would be a nightmare... thanks On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Xav Paice wrote: > - "Andrew Meadows" wrote: > >

TSM 6.2.1 DB

2011-09-01 Thread Andrew Meadows
All, We recently started installing fresh tsm 6.2.1 instances in house. I was wondering if someone could help me with the following questions/issues. Question 1) We have a 500 GB Database allocated. I have that split up into 4 filesystems with 127 GB each. Currently Only the first filesystem is

TSM 6.2.1 newbie question

2011-09-01 Thread Andrew Meadows
All,

Re: Upgrade form TSM 6.1 to 6.2

2011-08-19 Thread Andrew Meadows
Correct me if I am wrong but I think you need to be root to apply updates. On Aug 19, 2011 1:18 PM, "Yanick Quirion" wrote: > Dear all, > > Today I'm trying to upgrade our TSM 6.1 to 6.2 on a Redhat Linux 5 server. > > I logon using my username, which doesn't have root access. > > When I start the

Re: Dedup question

2011-08-10 Thread Andrew Meadows
dedup). > > Changing from file to vtl device type will make you lost client side dedup > capabilities. > --Message d'origine-- > De: Andrew Meadows > Expéditeur : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager > À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Répondre à: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager > Objet:

Re: Dedup question

2011-08-10 Thread Andrew Meadows
> > I have a question about client side dedup I was hoping I could get some >> help with. >> >> >> >> >> >> Environment: >> >> >> >> Server TSM 6.1.3 >> >> Client TSM 6.2.3 >> >> >> We are using client side dedup to decrease the amount of data being sent >> over the network. The problem is we rec

Re: Destroy Data on 3590 Tapes

2007-04-18 Thread Andrew Meadows
Super magnet or Sledge hammer Thats about the only way. You could write junk data to them but it takes at least 8 passes to really clean them. If you have encryption on then you have nothing to worry about. Herrmann, Boris wrote: Hi all, I've another question. We've got two new 3584 Libr

Re: Problems with Imation ultrium-2 (LTO-2) tapes?

2007-04-09 Thread Andrew Meadows
We saw a similar issue on LTO1's even with the latest firmware. We have since upgraded to LTO3 drives and have not seen the issue since. Even when reading the "trouble" LTO1's. On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 13:18 -0400, Kauffman, Tom wrote: > Is there any particular firmware I should be running in my IBM

Re: Good or bad idea?...offsite disk.

2007-04-02 Thread Andrew Meadows
You wouldnt be able to set up a copypool for the offsite copy it would have to be another onsite pool. You could always try using the devcl type of file and going that route. I would also look at doing the dbbackups as devcl=file. That is what we are looking at doing to reduce the waste of gigs of