Re: Multiple Emails from this group

2003-02-07 Thread Bengani, Thabani
I have the same problem too. It started this morning. -Original Message- From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2003 06:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Multiple Emails from this group Strange, not me. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Suppor

Re: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Bengani, Thabani
status Hi Thabs, Even although it is marked private, the fact that is emptyit should still backup to the tapes. What actually happened ? Linds -Original Message- From: Bengani, Thabani Sent: 29 January 2003 12:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape status Hi Tsmers, I have a

Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Bengani, Thabani
No, nothing on the activity log. The command I used is: label libv search=yes labels=b checkin=scr Strange enough is that I checked in one yesterday and it is fine no problems with it. -Original Message- From: Markus Veit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 02:39 To: [E

Re: Antwort: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Bengani, Thabani
Tsm server version 5.1.0 on a windows 2000 platform. When u do a q libv vol_name f=d, this is the result: Library Name: IBM3583 Volume Name: LT2400L1 Status: Private Owner: Last Use: Data Home Element: 4,101 Cleanings Left: As for q vol the result is : Volume

Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Bengani, Thabani
Hi Tsmers, I have a problem with my tapes in the LTO 3583 library. I checked in three scratch tapes for my weekly backup schedule and they are now marked private. The problem is, there is no data in these tapes they are empty. Anyone who has had this before or know the solution to it. Thank you i

Re: Versions-Compatibility

2003-01-29 Thread Bengani, Thabani
The client version can still remain the same and it should work. We have in our site done a similar exercise upgraded from version 4.2.3 to version 5.1.0 and a couple of clients were upgraded too, but the rest are still ver 4.2 and have no problems. -Original Message- From: Christoph Pilgr

3570 Magstar & 3580 LTO Drive Problems

2002-12-06 Thread Bengani, Thabani
Hello TSMERS, Please help. My TSM 5.1 server was previously running on NT4 and I upgraded to Win 2000. I have a magstar 3570 library and a 3583 lto library connected. The problem I am experiencing now is, my backups are failing complaining about insufficient mount points available & yet There is n

Help

2002-12-02 Thread Bengani, Thabani
Hello TSM people, Please help, if there is someone who knows where I can get the 3570 Magstar library drivers for Windows 2000. I have checked the IBM site and I can not find any there. Cheers. Thabani Bengani Business Solutions IT Boe Corporate Ext. 364 2113 Cell. 0825716778 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Library Problem

2002-11-15 Thread Bengani, Thabani
ecendly updated? - was OS patched/updated recently? - is there a cable problem? - something else Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant "Bengani, Thabani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 15.11.2002 11:52 Please respond to &qu

Re: Library Problem

2002-11-15 Thread Bengani, Thabani
Hi good people, We have tried the first option, deleted the library and the drives successfully. We left the device class. The problem now occurs when defining the drives, it says library is currently unavailable. I have even tried to define new devclass and library, but when it is time for the dr