ANR2121W

2001-03-27 Thread Debbie Denham
for a response from us whether to escalate this ticket or not. Thanks in advance for any suggestions other than TSM's. Sincerely, Debbie Denham Publishers Printing [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Expiration Schedules

2000-12-28 Thread Debbie Denham
encountered. Thanks in advance, Debbie Denham Publishers Printing Company

Re: RESTORE OF ARCHIVED FILES FROM COPYPOOL VOLUMES

2000-11-14 Thread Debbie Denham
. Sincerely, Debbie Denham >>> Lawrence Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/14/00 01:28PM >>> My apologies. I didn't see that in the note. Have you considered restoring the database from a point in time before the delete archive? >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/14/00 01:02

Re: RESTORE OF ARCHIVED FILES FROM COPYPOOL VOLUMES

2000-11-14 Thread Debbie Denham
eed to restore archived files from offsite copypool volumes to rearchive them. Is this at all possible? Does anyone know of the steps to do so? I have put the schedule for copypool reclamation on hold and file expiration will not take place until the next day. I would appreciate any advice. Thanks in advance. Debbie Denham

RESTORE OF ARCHIVED FILES FROM COPYPOOL VOLUMES

2000-11-14 Thread Debbie Denham
. Thanks in advance. Debbie Denham

Re: NEW 3590 CARTRIDGES

2000-10-27 Thread Debbie Denham
Richard, The write-protect thumbwheel you refer to, should the white dot be showing or not? Debbie Denham >>> Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/27/00 01:46PM >>> >If the tapes are prelabeled, I would just check them in I've learned not to trust tape sup

NEW 3590 CARTRIDGES

2000-10-27 Thread Debbie Denham
? I would appreciate any help. Thanks in advance, Debbie Denham 10/27/2000 11:59:58 ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: LABEL libv 3494a search=yes checkin=scratch devt=3590

Re: Automating Offsite Tape Rotation

2000-09-11 Thread Debbie Denham
Hello Bob, This AutoVault sounds like it would be useful to us. Could you please give me more information about it. Thank you, Debbie Denham System Administrator Publishers Printing [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Bob Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/11/00 12:07PM >>> DRM was too s

Re: Impatient clients on ADSM with 3494

2000-08-09 Thread Debbie Denham
Hello Bob, We also had an issue with the mount retention. At the present time our mount retention is 1 minute. We also made the decision to transfer all data to disk pool first and then to tape pool. Restores from disk are 100 times faster than tape. Have a great day, Debbie Denham

Re: Deleted copypool tapes go to pending.

2000-08-04 Thread Debbie Denham
In the GUI interface look at the storage pool properties of the copypool. There is a reuse delay swith. If you apply 0 days, once the volumes become pending they will automatically be sent back to scratch. Debbie Denham >>> Craig Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/04/00 12:17PM