And specifically, in what kind of library, and what is your opinion of it?
I'm talking specifically about the drive manufacturer, not the tapes
themselves--although if anyone has any notable experiences with tape brand
to drive brand compatibility that would be handy info as well.
Thanks!
Nicholas,
On the GUI, under ServiceDrive VPD, you can tie serial number to frame
and row, which can tie back to element under the drive menu. Use lscfg -v
info for serial numbers in AIX. It's a few steps, but all of the data can
be chained together.
Hope this helps!
Joy,
Our approach has been to create a separate domain which contain the same
management classes that the data is already bound to. In this way, we can
move the affected nodes to the new domain with no rebinding of data, and
maintain the inactive as well as the active data. It also allows TSM
for specific clients
h...
so would you define a new copygroup in the new domain with new retention
rules using the same managment class (name)?
- Original Message -
From: Kathleen M Hallahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 1:15 PM
Subject: Re
to clarify. Those would be different management classes
even
though they have the same name.
- Original Message -
From: Kathleen M Hallahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Sropping expiration for specific clients
Yes
Ok, well, I'm not sure how I got this far not knowing that this happened
or why, but I don't really run these kinds of numbers generally. Can
someone explain to me why the number of file-type active files in a
'select from backups' query would exceed the number of files listed in a
'query
@VM.MARIST.EDU
07/27/2007 09:34 AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: upgrade of 200 GB DB
Hi,
I had a client that I upgraded to 5.4 and consistently one of the TDP
for SQL instances refuses to terminate ...
Kathleen M
It took us less than 45 minutes for the upgrade from 5.2.3.1 to 5.4.0.3.
Our database is nearly 470GB although it's currently at 28% utilized (yes,
I know, it's a long story...), and runs on a P650.
Of greater concern is that the performance at the new code does not seem
to be as good, in a
on behalf of Kathleen M Hallahan
Of greater concern is that the performance at the new code does not seem
to be as good, in a rather vague and intermittent way. We are seeing
behavior that suggests that it's not always releasing network
communications properly, but not all the time and not for all
of the library clients we found we only had to run the
audit library command on all the library clients after they were pointed
to the new library manager.
Seems like this same approch would work for you.
Kathleen M Hallahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last week, Bill Boyer posted a message
Hello,
I'm interested in finding out from those people who are using Sepaton
systems for their TSM backups, what kind of nightly volume do you write to
it? I have the specs from the company regarding what it supports; what
I'm interested in is how it holds up in the real world under heavy write
Last week, Bill Boyer posted a message (which I no longer have) about
splitting a database and library sharing. and ownership of tapes. I saw
one response suggesting exporting and importing the data, but nothing
else.
Did anyone ever come up with other ideas on this? I'm actually getting
ready
I was actually just looking at the Baltimore conference listing for TSM
content, and all I can find is one session on future directions. Is this
an anomaly, or should I be looking somewhere else? Baltimore is close
enough that I could probably justify going for at least some of the event,
if I
Our Netware admin has come to me looking for some assistance in updating
the Netware password via a script across all of her servers (due to a
security requirement, they all have to be changed every 90 days now). To
do it manually involves running a dsmc incr of one file on every server
and
Ouzen
Haifa University
Israel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kathleen M Hallahan
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 6:17 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Updating a Netware password via a script.
Our Netware admin has come to me
What Checklabel parameter did you use when you checked the tapes in? If
you used either No or Barcode, then it might be worth doing a label libvol
of one tape and backing up the database to that volume to see if it works.
If you used Checklabel=Yes, you could try taking that drive offline and
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kathleen M Hallahan
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 12:45 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: load/unload behavior/db backup failure
What Checklabel parameter did you use when you checked
An audit library should clear this up. It may be helpful to have the 3584
to a physical scan on the library first.
If all else fails, you can try running a checkout libvol using remove=no
and checkl=no, and then check it back in. But the fact that your library
and TSM server are out of sync
We tested it out in our environment, and did not find the same
problem--all tapes were scanned appropriately.
I guess our barcode scanner is right-side-up.
_
Kathleen Hallahan
Freddie Mac
Storage Management -- Tape
703-450-3317
Jurjen Oskam [EMAIL
Is this something you folks are seeing in all frames, or in just one? We
just upgraded one library to this code not long ago, and I'd like to check
and see whether it's affecting us as well. That particular library also
has a fair amount of empty space, but we're supposed to upgrade another
one
Management -- Tape
703-450-3317
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:33:00PM -0500, Kathleen M Hallahan wrote:
Is this something you folks are seeing in all frames, or in just one?
Both. Our 3584 is just one frame. :)
--
Jurjen Oskam
Or you could simply run the command
backup stg primarypool newcopypool
and then delete the old copy pool after the new copy completes. Unless
you need the 3590's back immediately, or there's a downside to this that
I'm not aware of...
_
Kathleen Hallahan
I've put in a DCR trying to get this changed back, in fact. There's no
good reason for everyone who might run a backup or archive--including
DBAs, application/business users, etc.--to have write access to the file
like that. And it runs contrary to the current climate of increasing
security.
Oh yes, we see this from time to time. We used to have a lot more of
these sorts of errors, and have spent considerable time working with IBM
on this sort of thing since moving to 3584 libraries. Early on, a lot of
tape drives were replaced; sometimes, having the drive calibrated seems to
help.
Kurt,
I sent this information off to our Netware admin as a possible fix for
some issues we're having, and she cannot even locate the setting. I tried
a Google search with no luck, and a search of Novell's website didn't
return anything to me. I'm not a Netware person at all so I have no idea
Thanks--I'll pass this along to her!
_
Kathleen Hallahan
Freddie Mac
Distributed Backups
703-450-3317
Troy Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
09/16/2005 11:19 AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Should one of those tcpport settings actually be a tcpclientport?
We've been through this with firewalls and now just use tcpclientport in
the default configuration, using the same port number as tcpport.
Kathleen
Steve Schaub
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ST.COM
nager"|
|| |
|+---
|
||
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| cc: (bcc: Kathleen M Hallahan/IS
PROTECTED] |
| cc: (bcc: Kathleen M Hallahan/ISS/HQ/FHLMC) |
| Subject: Re: AIX Server - What's Stable? |
|
David,
You sta
nager" |
|| |
|+--
|
||
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| cc: (bcc: Kathleen M Hallahan/ISS/HQ/FHLMC) |
| Subject:
Has anyone ever seen the message "ANRD smnode.c (6502) : Cannot push
Normalized Insert Verb."? This occurred when a restore session was kicked off
during the night, and it cancelled a backup in order to claim the tape drive.
Normally when that happens the backup cancels cleanly and
Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Kathleen M Hallahan/ISS/HQ/FHLMC)
Subject Re: Problems after 4.1 Upgrade and Resolutions
:
Kathleen,
I read your post on ADSM forum regarding the tape IO errors Diana Noble
was havi
AIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Kathleen M Hallahan/ISS/HQ/FHLMC)
Subject Re: Problems after 4.1 Upgrade and Resolutions
:
Diane,
What level of microcode are you currently running on your 3590 tape drives.
We are running 3590E1A tape drives with a microcode level of
Thanks for the info!
Diana Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/30/2001 12:16:03 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Kathleen M Hallahan/ISS/HQ/FHLMC)
Subject Re: Problems after 4
When a storage pool contains tapes in pending status, and the pool is
subsequently updated to "reusedelay=0 days," how long should it take before
those tapes drop into scratch status? I expected them to change status
immediately, and they aren't.
Thanks!
Kathleen
35 matches
Mail list logo
