also do the trick.
Regards.
Norman
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
23/07/2008 16:35
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
[ADSM-L] SQL querying
Hi *SM-ers!
I'm
:55
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SQL querying
On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
Hi *SM-ers!
I'm trying to create an SQL query to extract failed files from the
activity log.
When I do a select * from actlog all goes well, but as soon as I
replace
Hi guys!
I decided to open a PMR for the TSMOR bug and support told me there already is
an open APAR for this problem:
APAR= IC57290 SER= ANR2906E UNEXPECTED SQL LITERAL TOKEN - 'RUS' ERROR FROM
OPERATIONAL REPORTING
ERROR DESCRIPTION:
The following select statement is issued for Operational
Hi *SM-ers!
I'm trying to create an SQL query to extract failed files from the
activity log.
When I do a select * from actlog all goes well, but as soon as I replace
the * with things like nodename, date_time, message to filter the
output, the query becomes slower and slower.
Is there a
Hi Tim!
Could this Technote be related?
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21306799
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tim Brown
Sent: dinsdag 22 juli 2008 15:13
To:
Hi Phil!
Same here! It seems to be a bug in TSMOR 5.5.1.
I didn't feel like reporting it to IBM (I know, I know, not very helpfull of
me) so I went back to the 5.4 version.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Hi *SM-ers!
The filesystem which contains my volume history file was filled to 100%
last night, so TSM reported I/O errors while writing to it. I have had
the filesystem enlarged, but now I have a volume history file which is
missing data.
Is there a way to rebuild a volume history file?
Thank you
Of
TSM User
Sent: vrijdag 4 juli 2008 13:09
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Rebuilding a volume history file
BAckup VOLHistory
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *SM-ers!
The filesystem which contains my volume history file was filled
Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: vrijdag 4 juli 2008 14:40
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Rebuilding a volume history file
On Jul 4, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
Hi!
I don't
Hi *SM-ers!
Our Linux guys are trying to find a way to do bare metal restores on
Linux (Redhat) while using TSM.
I was wondering how other companies have implemented this. I there a
supported/documented way to do this?
Thank you very much for any response in advance!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
Hi *SM-ers!
My TSM Operational Reporter creates a daily report for our Windows guys.
Part of this report is a SQL query which returns all missed files. This
is the query:
select -
actlog.nodename as Node Name, -
substr(char(actlog.date_time), 1, 16) as Date/Time, -
substr(actlog.message,
-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:01 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Speeding up my SQL query
Hi *SM-ers!
My TSM Operational Reporter creates a daily report for our Windows guys.
Part of this report
Hi Richard!
Thank you very much for your reply!
Since I'm not much of an SQL wizzard, could you please help met with
rebuilding the query?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Amen, amen amen!!!
I still use the good old GUI which still works as long as you don't
click on the storagepools option. (a q stgpool format=gui returns an
internal error).
New TSM customers really should take a look at it (It's part of the
Windows 3.1 client and can be installed separately).
Yeehaw? Are you really waiting for an DB2 database?
The TSM database is now very stable and hardly needs any attention. I'm
running quite a few product over here which are using a pre-defined DB2
database, but although IBM sells them as install and forget I have
never seen a DB2 database run for
Hi Remco!
What if you cannot restore a file? IBM will tell you to upgrade the
client to a supported level, which you will do. Now you still cannot
restore the file. Now IBM will tell you, well, the file was backed up
with an unsupported client version. Bad luck...
And also, most companies don't
Hi Richard!
In fact it does. Thank you very much!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: maandag 21 januari 2008 19:26
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re:
Hi *SM-ers!
I'm running two TSM server instances on an AIX host.
Upgrading them from 5.3 to 5.4.0.0 works fine. I installed the 5.4.0.0
code through smitty, changed the /usr/tivoli/tsm/server path to the
second instance and install the 5.4.0.0 code here, using the force (-F)
flag. Both instances
Hi Timothy!
The first 5.5 patch level has yet to be released, so my guess is we'll
have to wait a while before seeing the first maintenance release...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi *SM-ers!
After a long time I tried logging on to my test TSM server, but I
couldn't.
I canceled the server (kill -9) and started it in the foreground. It
seemed to be related to an unexpected system date, so here is what I
did:
accept date
ANR2017I Administrator SERVER_CONSOLE issued command:
januari 2008 16:24
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM locked me out
Hi Eric
Try 'enable sess admin' or 'enable sess all'.
//Henrik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: den 3 januari 2008 16:14
To: ADSM
, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
Hi *SM-ers!
After a long time I tried logging on to my test TSM server, but I
couldn't.
I canceled the server (kill -9) and started it in the foreground.
General Unix advice: Always do a simple 'kill PID' on a process (which
is equivalent to 'kill -TERM PID
114
LTOLIB7 DbBackupPrivate 3
Larry
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
12/12/2007 05:05 AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re
copy than primary tapes? I would think the tape count could
swing the other way.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 8:05 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 8:05 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Strange difference between Primary and Copypool
Hi Jim!
My copy pool is an online copy pool. Tapes
that there is a different number of tapes. Has there always
been more copy than primary tapes? I would think the tape count could
swing the other way.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: Tuesday
Hi *SM-ers!
I found something very strange on one of my TSM servers.
When I issue the following command:
select stgpool_name as Storagepool,sum(physical_mb) as MB from
occupancy group by stgpool_name
I recieve the following output:
Storagepool MB
--
Hi Jim!
My copy pool is an online copy pool. Tapes (in fact virtual tapes) are
not checked out, nor removed from the (virtual) library.
I didn't state that my copy pool is larger than the primary pool (hence
my line although the copy pool (DL_LBU3_CPY_1) contains less data, it
uses more tapes!!!)
I agree with John. We are currently using 100Gb. volumes in out DL700,
but I'm frequently called by user who's restore seems to hang.
In most cases the tape is in use by another restore or in use by a
backup storagepool/reclamation which first has to finish the file it's
backing up or reclaiming.
Hi Del!
I asked our SQL guy to send me his tdpsql.cfg file. It contains the
following:
BUFFers 3
BUFFERSIze 1024
FROMSQLserver KL109FLE
SQLAUTHentication INTegrated
SQLBUFFers 0
SQLBUFFERSIze 1024
SQLSERVer KL109FLE
STRIPes 1
LOGFile tdpsql.log
Hi TSM-ers!
One of our SQL Server 2005 (running DP for SQL Server 5.3.3.0) the full
backup fails every time.
In the tdpsql.log we see the following messages:
11/23/2007 02:26:44 ACO5436E A failure occurred on stripe number (0), rc
= 428
11/23/2007 02:26:44 ACO5407E The SQL server aborted the
Hi Del!
Thank you very much for your reply!!!
I assume these paramaters all have to be specified in the TDP option
file?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Del Hoobler
Sent:
Hoi Del!
I understand that using the same TSM node for backing up the Principal
and the new Principal after a take-over is a solution.
So: if ServerA is the principal, one has to execute the backup script on
this server. After a take-over, ServerB becomes the principal and one
has to execute the
Hi Del!
I think our SQL guys will go for the second solution. We use a
third-party scheduling tool (Control-M) and failing backups will create
a problem report.
I will forward your suggestion to them.
Again, thank you very much for your reply!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch
Hi Del!
Let's say ServerA is the Principal and ServerB is the Mirror.
Normally you would schedule a DP backup on ServerA. The
(mirror-)database on ServerB is running in a state which doesn't allow
backing up (restore mode?)
Now there is a take-over and ServerB becomes the new Principal. Now you
Hi TSM-ers!
One of my SQL colleagues asks me whether DP for SQL Server supports the
SQL Server 2005 Database Mirroring feature.
My first thought was to check the manual Data Protection for Microsoft
SQL Server Installation and User's Guide Version 5 release 2, but the
word mirroring isn't
Hi Del!
Thank you very much for your reply!
I thought this was a feature which the backup software should be aware
of, but apparently not (I'm the TSM Server guru ;-) and definitely not
the TDP guru, you know). I will forward your answer to our SQL guys.
Thanks again!
Kindest regards,
Eric van
Hi Del!
I just spoke with the SQL guy and his question is a little bit more
clear to me now.
The database is running on the Principal and a copy is running on the
Mirror.
The database is backed up on the Principal. After a take-over the Mirror
becomes the new Principal, so the backup should be
Hi *SM-ers!
I'm trying to add a new TSM server to the TSM Operational Reporter, but
when I right-click the tree, the Add a New TSM Server option is grayed
out...
Does anybody know what could be causing this?
Thank you very much in advance!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Hi *SM-ers!
When I visit the IBM Information Center website and select the Tivoli
Storage Manager for Database 5.4 set, I only see a Data Protection for
SQL Server manual, version 5.2.
DP for SQL Server 5.3 has been around for a while, hasn't it?
Does anybody know where to find a more recent DP
Hi Del!
Hmm... This manual is dated September 2003 and doesn't mention a word
about how to handle SQL Server 2005 database mirroring.
Is there a white paper about how to backup a SQL Server 2005 with
database mirroring?
Thank you very much for your reply
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM
Hi Del!
I will forward this information to our SQL guys.
Thank you very much for your reply!!!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Del Hoobler
Sent: dinsdag 10 juli 2007 15:43
To:
Hi *SM-ers!
One of our SQL guys asked me whether TDP for Databases supports SQL 2005
Database Mirroring.
I don't know any technical details about this feature (I'm 'just' a TSM
admin;-) but he says it's a SQL Server 2005 (64-bit) with a principal
and a passive mirror server, which is running in a
Hi William!
UPDate DEVclass deviceclassname MOUNTRetention=amount of minutes
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Kyndt
Sent: vrijdag 15 juni 2007 15:20
To:
Hi!
You probbably have no mount points available.
Checkout technote 1083695:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663context=SSGSG7uid=swg21
083695loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Well... Only if the tape contains data from a BA client. If the tape
contains TOP data, you will have to reschedule a full database backup
for that client.
If you have a read-only tape you should check the tape by moving it's
data to a new tape, using the MOVE DATA command. If it fails, you can
Well, not using documented commands that is...
If you issue the following SQL statement to retrieve the file's object
id:
select * from backups where node_name='your nodename' and
filespace_name='\\your nodename\driveletter$' and
hl_name='\directory path\' and ll_name='filename'
you can use the
Hi Andy!
No, the log isn't showing more detail.
Together with support, I have identified the tapes on which the backup
resides. I'm currently running an audit on these tapes. Let's wait for
the results...
Thanks for now!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original
Hi *SM-ers!
Our SQL guys are trying to restore a SQL database. They receive the
following error:
ANS1314E File data currently unavailable on server
In the TSM activity log I see the following message:
ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed for session 2337961 for node
KL1007W9-SQL (TDP MSSQL
Hi Pablo!
You will have to kill the TSM server and start it in the foreground
(dsmserv). Then you will be able to reset your password by issuing the
upd admin command.
Then switch the server to the background, if your OS allows you top do
so. Otherwise, halt your server and restart it again in the
Hi Nick!
The error occurred on several files on multiple filesystems.
The audits didn't fix the problem since they seemed to crash somewhere.
The audit process started, but there was never a process completed
message and a q proc, a few seconds after the started, showed no running
processes...
Hi Andy!
You're right, I should be more specific.
I'm running the 5.3.4.0 client on a Windows XP Pro SP2 workstation.
I don't have a dsmsched.log, since I backup my pc manually every now and
then.
You will find the dsmerror.log and my dsm.opt below this message.
I'm performing an incremental
Hi Andy!
Scenario 1: no error messages.
Scenario 2: no error messages.
Scenario 3: The ANS1376W re-occurred, but only once.
Please let me know if I can help you further with this. Thanks!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
Hi *SM-ers!
I have got an interesting situation here.
Please have a look at the following entries and TSM's response.
DELETE VOLUME /appl/tsm_lbu1/diskpool1/lbu1_diskpool_114
ANR2406E DELETE VOLUME: Volume
/appl/tsm_lbu1/diskpool1/lbu1_diskpool_114 still contains data.
Ok, so the volume isn't
] On Behalf Of
David E Ehresman
Sent: vrijdag 19 januari 2007 18:09
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Interesting...
Try Audit Volume
The problem seems to go away with current code levels.
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/19/2007 12:02 PM
Hi *SM-ers!
I have got an interesting
Hi *SM-ers!
Today I encountered some warnings during the backup of my pc.
For several files and directories I see the following messages in the
dsmerror.log:
ANS1327W The snapshot operation for 'C:\AUTOEXEC.BAT' failed with error
code: 650.
The client was unable to obtain a snapshot of the file
Hi Andy!
Can you explain what's causing the message you are reffering to (The
client was unable to obtain a snapshot of the file system. The operation
will continue without snapshot support)?
If TSM wasn't able to obtain a snapshot, a user would like to know
why...
Also, it's only issued for a few
Hi Thomas!
Cross-client restore is not supported. That's probably why these
messages are not to be found in the messages manual.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas Denier
Hi Kerry!
This means that the volume is not a scratch volume, probably because
it's still in TSM's volume inventory. Check the volume's current status
by issuing a q vol 00022 f=d.
If you are using DRM, you should use the DRM commands to return the
volume.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal
My 2 cents: There is on big advantage for using a VTL over a disk
subsystem: compression.
We are also using a EMC DL700 which uses in-the-box LTO compatible
compression.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To all Dutch TSM users,
On November 23rd. We will organize a Dutch TSM User Group event with the
following subjects:
- TSM 5.4
- Update TSM products (roadmap)
- Virtual Tape Library or devclass=file?
- HSM Windows demo (Caminosoft)
- Reporting, compliance and TSM (Sox etc.)
Location is not yet
Hi Charles!
The missing bos.rte v5 message means that you are trying to install AIX
5.x software on an older AIX OS.
What level of AIX are you running and what is the Oracle level?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Hi *SM-ers!
On our AIX clients, the output from the dsmc i command is send to a
logfile for further processing. Every now and then, the output from the
backup of a file contains a crlf.
Instead of:
Normal File-- 87,042 /mount/appl00399/lido_apps/lido/etc/0008704600
[Sent]
The output looks like
Hi Norita!
For backups: yes. Backup objects are rebound to the new managementclass
during the next backup, so all inactive versions older than 30 days will
be removed.
Archives are not rebound, so changing retention for archives will not
change retention for previously made archives.
Kindest
Hi Murugan!
1) Yes, you can install it on all clients. I would use the latest
version though: 5.3.4.0.
2) Yes, this is possible and documented in the IBM Redbook Backing Up
DB2 Using IBM Tivoli Storage Manager
(http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246247.html?Open)
Kindest regards,
Eric van
Hi *SM-ers!
We have an AIX 5.2 server with two TSM instances running on the same AIX
partition.
We have upgraded the first instance, changed the link to the second
instance's install path and rerun SMIT INSTALL to upgrade this instance.
The first upgrade runs fine, but I cannot find a way to
Hi *SM-ers!
We are about to implement a second (fallback) IT center on another
location. The idea is to create a hot standby environment for TSM.
We are already using a separate copypool which will be moved to the new
remote location, so if the primary pool gets lost, we have all data (up
until
Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Allen S. Rout
Sent: vrijdag 1 september 2006 16:00
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Making TSM twin-center compliant
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:17:17 +0200, Loon, E.J. van
Hi *SM-ers!
When I use the 5.2 web admin on one of my TSM servers, the time format
is not what I expect it to be. For instance, when I query client events,
time is shown as 8:00 PM instead of 20:00. When I query through dsmadmc
it is shown as 20:00.
Does anybody know where to set the date and time
Hi Peter!
A delete volume runs as fast (or as slow) as a delete filespace. Actually, it
does the very same thing: delete every single object from the database one by
one.
If the node had it's own tapes, you could mark all it's tapes in both the
primary pool and the copy pool destroyed and let
Hi Del!
Your statement Customer always have the option of not installing a fix
release, and waiting for the next PTF or release of that Data Protection
client may be true in most cases, but not when new platform support is
added. You don't have the option to wait for a new release because you
Hi *SM-ers!
As far as I can find, DP for SQL Server 5.2.1 is the most recent version
for backing up SQL Server databases. It support SQL Server 7.0 and 2000.
Does anybody know when SQL Server 2005 will be supported by DP for SQL?
Thank you very much for any reply!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
Hi Del!
Thank you very much for your quick reply!
I wasn't expecting new support in a fix release... Wouldn't it be more
logical to create a 5.2.2.0 version containing 2005 support? Now we have
to backup production nodes by using a fix release, which I normally
would not recommend...
Kindest
Hi *SM-ers!
We have got one TDP for SQL (5.2.1) client which refuses to cooperate.
It's configured like all other TDP clients with a standard dsm.opt file
which contains the correct TCPServeraddress. However, as soon as we
start the TDP GUI, it returns:
ANS1033E (RC-53) An invalid TCP/IP address
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 10:54 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TDP for SQL configuration error...
Hi *SM-ers!
We have got one TDP for SQL (5.2.1) client which refuses to cooperate.
It's configured like all
Hi Lawrence
The message is quite self-explanatory: Session 1807 client is down-level
- apply IC34693. This APAR can be found at:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC34693
Just like Brian suggested, you should upgrade the client to a higher
level than 5.1.5.0. The error was fixed in
Hi *SM-ers!
I added the trace parameters to the dsm.opt on a client running the DP
for SQL Server client.
I added the following lines:
Tracefile d:\tdptrace\tdptrace.txt
Traceflags stats, options, compress
Tracemax 100
The tracefile confirmed this:
05/01/2006 21:30:47.745 : Current trace
Core 5 and all went well. So if the
above is not the case I'd rather suspect a problem in SuSe.
Regards,
Richard van Denzel.
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager namens Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Verzonden: wo 26-4-2006 10:13
Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: [ADSM-L
Hi *SM-ers!
I'm trying to create a trace, using the Windows 5.3.3.0 client.
The most recent Trace Facility Guide I could find was SH26-4121-01 for
TSM 4.2.
I added the following lines to the dsm.opt file:
Tracefile c:\temp\trace.txt
Traceflags instr
When I start dsm.exe, it complains about the
: Re: Trying to tun on tracing in the Windows 5.3 client.
On May 1, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
I'm trying to create a trace, using the Windows 5.3.3.0 client.
The most recent Trace Facility Guide I could find was SH26-4121-01 for
TSM 4.2. ...
Eric - Use the TSM Problem
.
-Mensaje original-
De: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Loon, E.J.
van - SPLXM Enviado el: martes, 25 de abril de 2006 15:40
Para: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Asunto: [ADSM-L] Installing the Linux client
Hi *SM-ers!
One of my Unix colleagues is trying to install the TSM
Hi David!
He receives the error during the installation of the API package...
Guess I will have to open a PMR for this.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David E Ehresman
Sent:
Hi *SM-ers!
One of my Unix colleagues is trying to install the TSM 5.3.3.0 client on
a SLES9 distribution.
I downloaded the client from
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintena
nce/client/v5r3/Linux/Linux86/v533/ and I delivered him the two packages
Hi Otto!
Checkout ftp://ftp.storsys.ibm.com/devdrvr/AIX/Atape.fixlist
Ultrium 3 support was added in level 9.0.1.0.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Otto Schakenbos
Sent: vrijdag 21 april 2006 19:57
To:
Hi *SM-ers!
One of my customers is complaining about the backup performance of the
daily DP for SQL Server. The tdpsql.log shows that performance is 15
Mb/sec. which looks very fine to me for a host which is connected to a
100 MB LAN, but the customer showed me the TDP log from December last
year
Hi Bill!
I don't know the answer, but I can maybe point you in the right
direction. You can download the NEO 2000/4000 User Installation Guide
from Overland Storage:
http://support.overlandstorage.com/jive/entry.jspa?externalID=3518categ
oryID=9
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch
Hi Nigel!
I haven't got any experience with non-IBM devices, but as far as I know,
you will have to use the TSM Device Support driver for non-IBM tape
devices.
Did you check the IBM technote for the MSL 6000 series? Here it is:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663uid=swg21116751
Kindest
Hi Rod!
TSM stores backups as aggregates. An aggregate can contain multiple
client backup files. The client files within an aggregate will expire
over time and thus occupy space within the aggregate.
When you use a file device class or a tape, you can reclaim the wasted
space these expired files
Hi Thomas!
For your information: IBM just released all 5.3.3.0 servers on their FTP
sites.
I checked for you: it contains the fix for APAR IC47731.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi *SM-ers!
I noticed that the 5.3.3.0 client code has been made available on the
FTP server!
Request to Andy Raibeck: could you ask the FTP owner to update the
/LATEST subdirectories too? They all still contain the 5.3.2.0 code...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Hi Thomas!
APAR IC47731 was fixed in patch level 5.3.2.3 and IC45931 was fixed in
5.3.2.1. The most recent patch level is 5.3.2.4 and your version can be
downloaded from
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/ser
ver/Linux/5.3.2.4/s390x/
IBM just released a new client
Hi Andy!
I was being hit by APAR IC45627. I had a hard time recreating the
problem too, because I was using the 5.3.2.0 client, which already
contains the fix for this APAR. The customer experiencing the problem
was using the 5.3.0.0 base code. I will have him upgrade his version.
Thank you very
Hi Del!
Thank you very much for your reply!
Yes, they did add the database to the Recovery Storage Group before
performing the restore and they did select the this database can be
overwritten by a restore option.
The Exchange people also checked the storage group name and database
name and cannot
Hi Jim!
The 5.3.3.0 client maintenance release is scheduled to be released
somewhere this month.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jim Bollard
Sent: woensdag 15 maart 2006 14:11
Hi *SM-ers!
We have just implemented an archiving server. We only want archives on
this TSM server, so we created policies without a backup copy group.
This however causes the BA GUI to see all files as excluded.
I checked the TSM website and found Technote 1209666
Hi *SM-ers!
A restore of a Exchange 2003 server to a Recovery Storage Group on a
recovery server fails with the following message is the tdpexc.log:
03/14/2006 15:25:15 Restore of KL1010WF-SG1 failed.
03/14/2006 15:25:15 ACN5798E MS Exchange API HRESERESTORECOMPLETE()
failed with HRESULT:
Hi Tae!
Not, this is not nessesary. The API client is only used during a backup,
so if no backup is running, you can replace all files during
installation and no restart is required.
However, I would wait a few days before starting the upgrade. The
5.3.3.0 client will be released this month.
Hi Wanda!
Where did you find a 5.1.8 client for Windows NT?
The newest I can find is 5.1.7.0...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: dinsdag 7 maart 2006 19:51
Hi Chris!
What server and client level are you using?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christoph Pilgram
Sent: dinsdag 7 maart 2006 7:39
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Undo
Hi!
I totally agree with Richard. I myself was participating in the TSM 5.3
beta program. During this beta a lot (and I really mean a lot) of the
people in the beta forum where complaining about ISC and the ISC
concept. It wasn't even working in the beginning, it required a powerful
server with at
1 - 100 of 737 matches
Mail list logo
