TSM 5.2.3 Down on Windows 2003

2008-09-29 Thread MUHAMMAD SADAT ANWAR
Dear All, I am on Windows 2003 and TSM 5.2.3. Yes - I know i need to upgrade..We had it planned for next week to 5.4. Right now the problem is: 1- DB volume extension was triggered and the space for that was not availble on the disk. 2- My guy, swithced off the server and then restarted just to

Re: Upgrade 5.2.3 to 5.5 directly

2008-02-29 Thread Muhammad Sadat Anwar
7;t run TSM on Windows so Your Mileage May Vary on the upgrade. > > See Ya' > Howard > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Muhammad Sadat Anwar > Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 12:22 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MA

Upgrade 5.2.3 to 5.5 directly

2008-02-28 Thread Muhammad Sadat Anwar
Dear All, Can I upgrade from 5.2.3 to 5.5 Directly with the following info: 1- Windows 2003 enterprise edition with SP2 2- It is a single instance server 3- HP MSL 6060 with 2 drives Ultrium 2 4- Would the database upgrade itself? Kind Regards, Sadat

Re: Server-Server Communication and remote vault

2007-12-31 Thread Muhammad Sadat Anwar
1 > Whatever you can do or believe you can, begin it. > Boldness has genius, power and magic. > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Muhammad Sadat Anwar > Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 12:02 AM > To: ADS

Re: Server-Server Communication and remote vault

2007-12-25 Thread Muhammad Sadat Anwar
d more sure option. > > Orville L. Lantto > > From: Muhammad Sadat Anwar > Sent: Mon 12/24/2007 01:26 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: [ADSM-L] Server-Server Communication and remote vault > > Dear All, > Greetings ! > > Running TSM 5.2.3 (will upgrade s

Server-Server Communication and remote vault

2007-12-23 Thread Muhammad Sadat Anwar
Dear All, Greetings ! Running TSM 5.2.3 (will upgrade shortly) and file server on Windows 2003 platform on all locations. The problem: 1- We want our 350GB File data to replicate in other city over WAN link of 1MB. 2- Management do not want to purchase other software for replication. Solution in

Re: defective tape (copy pool volume)

2007-12-11 Thread Muhammad Sadat Anwar
hmm I have not explored this area of server to server copypools.. Hope that someone else would be in better position.. ! I guess Michael. Sadat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > ok. I should have said that the copy pool is defined on a server to server > connection. So the server that creates

Re: defective tape (copy pool volume)

2007-12-10 Thread Muhammad Sadat Anwar
Whereas I guess, Once you successfully remove the tape from library ..we do not need to discard the data .. but you may ask TSM to move the data to the same storage pool..in your case copypool. ..The files will be taken from primary pool and then yo may run your normal procedures which will not i

Re: Recommended policy for single drive scenario

2006-04-27 Thread Muhammad Sadat Anwar
rive.I´ve already installed and configured TSM with automated tape > > libraries.but this customer is a small company and they will not > > change anything on their environment..so, it will be the operator´s > > responsibility to change tapes everyday and

Re: Recommended policy for single drive scenario

2006-04-26 Thread MUHAMMAD SADAT ANWAR
> Mario > > > > - Original Message > From: Muhammad Sadat Anwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 3:18:01 PM > Subject: Re: Recommended policy for single drive scenario > > Mario, > 1- In the first pl

Re: Recommended policy for single drive scenario

2006-04-26 Thread Muhammad Sadat Anwar
Mario, 1- In the first place .. how many client nodes are there? 2- How much space is there on your local hard disk for diskpool? 3- Your option of collocating the backups would eliminate if you run scheduled backups directly to tape. 3-Reclaimation would require quite alot of space again on your