I will be out of the office starting 24/08/2007 and will not return until
03/09/2007.
I am away from the office until Monday 3rd September. Pls contact Rik Foote
for any urgent enquiries.
/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/
Cheers, Suad
--
"Pahari, Dinesh P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
30/03/2007 01:48 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
TSM Backup - Volume Shadow Copy Failed
How about "virtualmountpoint", for a few folders, in the client options
file and have the tape stgpool collocate by filespace.
Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 21/03/2007
09:03:06 PM:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am trying to backup a very large FS
s non trivial.
If you have multiple TSM servers sharing a library, I would personally
define a dedicated TSM LM instance
(maybe on a separate port) that you can easily move with minimal planning,
in future.
Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 21/03/2007
05:36:37 AM:
>
CHAR64
OCCUPANCY STGPOOL_NAME VARCHAR30
OCCUPANCY NUM_FILES INTEGER 0
OCCUPANCY PHYSICAL_MBDECIMAL14
OCCUPANCY LOGICAL_MB DECIMAL14
OCCUPANCY FILESPACE_ID INTEGER
Recommended to use the Automatic Cleaning method.
It's in the Planning and Operator guides of both the 3583 and 3584.
Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 22/12/2006
02:14:32 PM:
> Those of you who have the IBM 3584 tape libraries - please weigh in on
&g
Messages fileset are corrupt.
Get the messages filesets from another source (ask your Tivoli rep)
Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 19/12/2006
10:53:07 AM:
> Hi all,
>
> We are right now upgrading from TSM 5.2.3 to 5.3 .. however we encouter
> this prob
have
to come up with you own conclusions.
Cheers, Suad
--
Paul van Dongen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
24/11/2006 11:02 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Mixed 3592Gen1 & Gen2
Hel
I will be out of the office starting 08/05/2006 and will not return until
09/05/2006.
I am away from the office until Tuesday 9th May. Pls contact Rik Foote for
any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 09/03/2006 and will not return until
13/03/2006.
I am away from the office until Monday 13th March. Pls contact Rik Foote
for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 03/12/2005 and will not return until
13/12/2005.
I am away from the office until Monday 13th November. Pls contact Bruce
Campbell for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 31/10/2005 and will not return until
04/11/2005.
I am away from the office until Thursday 4th November. Pls contact Rik
Foote for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 07/10/2005 and will not return until
18/10/2005.
I am away from the office until Tuesday 18th October. Pls contact Rik Foote
for any urgent enquiries.
I will be out of the office starting 05/08/2005 and will not return until
08/08/2005.
I am away from the office until Monday 8th August. Pls contact Rik Foote
for any urgent enquiries.
Why not put in some 3592 drives in the 3494?
Unfortunately the number of files is going to be the limiting factor.
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 19/06/2005
06:08:42 AM:
> From the movie "Blazing Saddles" ... You use your tongue better than
> a $20 ...you-know-what. Couldn't have said it bet
I will be out of the office starting 04/05/2005 and will not return until
05/05/2005.
I am away from the office until Thursday 5th May
I will be out of the office starting 22/04/2005 and will not return until
26/04/2005.
I am away from the office until Tuesday 26th April.
I will be out of the office starting 15/04/2005 and will not return until
18/04/2005.
I am away from the office until Monday 18th April
For storage related problems/questions/requests, contact Rik Foote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I will be out of the office starting 08/04/2005 and will not return until
11/04/2005.
I am away from the office until Monday 11th April
For storage related problems/questions/requests, contact Rik Foote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sounds like a network issue..
/usr/include/sys/errno.h:
#define EPIPE 32 /* Broken pipe */
bit of a bummer.
cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/11/2004
09:27:01 AM:
> Sunday AM, after running 15 hou
Yes, the storage pool can have collocation turned off without affecting
existing data.
Just a note, you may want to read up on what collocation does. Over time
it will affect overall restore
performance as node data will be spread amongst many tapes.
Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Ma
Are there more nodes/filespaces defined using that stgpool?
Maybe you want to switch off collocation for that stgpool.
Cant really say beyond that as you have supplied little extra info.
Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/11/2004
02:02
I had a similar problem, I ended up physically pulling it out,
re-inventorizing and checking it back in.
The bugs in the 3494 are there but more subtle :)
- Original Message -
From: "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 6:50 AM
Subject
found older and I/O bound servers getting up to half the throughput
of something
new, out of the box.
Sounds like you have more than enough grunt to push data through to the
drives.
Cheers, Suad
--
- Original Message -
From: "MC Matt Cooper (2838)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: &
a.k.a I dont want to reinvent the wheel.
Can anyone suggest an elegant way of feeding SQLBT summary data through to
TSM so we
can see it on the activity log?
Cheers, Suad
--
(i.e. cold). The only
reason you may want to use the TDP is if you mount the pseudo volume on
another machine to reduce I/O impact
on the main host, otherwise it benefits for cold backups.
Cheers, Suad
--
- Original Message -
From: "Jin Bae Chi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
find that it quite
easily handles saturation for long periods of time.
Theorectically you can backup 55Gbytes an hour, depending how well your
server/network/settings are tuned.
Suad
--
On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 05:30, Camilo A. Marrugo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need some advice if possible, we a
ps
in a few hours.
I would look at keeping a separate Gigabit segment for the database
servers. It won't take too many connections on the main pipe to take a
big chunk of it, and if you stream to tape you want the LTO drive
buffers to be well fed (a potential performance issue).
Cheers, Suad
It depends when the last time interval counts down to zero. Have a look
in the dsmsched.log file.
Have you changed the schedule within a few hours of the event?
Suad
--
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 05:20, shekhar Dhotre wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> quick question about scheduling :
>
>
Have you though about upgrading to 5.1.5 and running Linux?
Also, I've been investigating and have found newer Intel based servers
are coming with a lot more I/O capabilities.
Unfortunately the vendors don't seem to publish I/O benchmarks for their
machines.
Suad
--
On Tue, 2002-11-1
meserver (AUTH02.NS.UU.NET)
Unintentional, or brutal??
Suad
--
> Are you trying to go to a page within www.tivoli.com, or did you actually
> try the main www.tivoli.com page? Try the main page to see if you can get
> to it. If that doesn't work, then try flushing your web browser cache,
This is being addressed in the 2.5/3.0 kernel
but means, in the short/medium term, Linux could be an issue.
We are playing safe, initially, and using the TSM Linux server for lots
of small nodes and virtual volumes to our main TSM server.
Suad
--
> 1. Running TSM Server under Linux on Int
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:38, Slag, Jerry B. wrote:
> http://www-1.ibm.com/support/search.wss?rs=663&tc=SSGSG7&dc=D400
And when you filter 'All Supported Versions' + 'Client' you get ;
No documents match your query
Please revise your search criteria
But if you use 'All Versions'
hey should get it considering the
scale of this problem. (e.g. try find matching firmware/BIOS/driver for
a FASTt HBA adapter, not challenging enough...match it with a supported
SDD/RDAC)
Actually, this seems to reflect how it works when you deal with IBM via
their public call centre.
Suad
--
http://ww
Then remove the mirroring.
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 16:43, Raghu S wrote:
> Here i am not worried about the protection.I am worried about the
> performace. Most of my client backups are failed.
>
>
>
> Suad Musovich
>
How about other older versions/platforms?
Has anyone tested older 3.1/7 clients with the 5.1 server?
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 08:22, Dirk Billerbeck wrote:
> Sorry, OS/2 (BTW: IBMs OWN operating system!!) is no longer supported! :
> -(( The latest client version is v3.7.2.27, you can find it here:
Realistically, if Array B dies, you lose the Database "and" recovery
log. The mirroring ain 't giving you protection from that.
I would separate the recovery log to array A and lose the mirroring on
both DB and log(maybe mirror log between arrays).
Restoration of a broken DB should only mean a coup
We have around a dozen people using the web admin interface and I see a
couple of them regularly causing that message. Haven't noticed any
problmes
I think it's more to do with the browser functionality(Java engine).
Try changing browsers and see if it stops.
Suad
--
On Thu, 2002-1
Depends if you are running other processes (especially expiration).
Also you havent mentioned your HW configuration.
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 04:54, Dearman, Richard wrote:
> I haven't done aTSM DB backup in the last few days. So I started one today
> and it is moving very slow I have a 30GB databa
It's probably adjusting to the narrow frame width of the browser.
Redirect to a file (" > filename") and look at the output. Not sure if
you can do this with a browser
You can also run a commandline script and use the -commadelimited flag.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Tue, 2002-10-
File (bytes): 512,000
>
> Waiting for access to output volume UA0283
> (19095 seconds).
>
>
> Suad
> --
Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical
File (bytes): 512,000
Waiting for access to output volume UA0283
(19095 seconds).
Suad
--
Easy, don't reboot ;)
Seriously you should say what your server is (looks like a Wintel server
from 'ere judging by the reboot issue).
Are you losing the driver or connectivity? Does it come back if you
probe the device list/interface?
What's your firmware level on the drives th
Hmm, I tried running the "cleanup backupgroups" command and got the
result:
ANR0106E imutil.c(8262): Unexpected error 0 fetching row in table
"Object.Ids"
Seems to be a known problem. (and I'm running 4.2.2.12)
Suad
--
APAR= IC34375 SER=
tely before the upgrade.
Suad
--
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 08:13, Lisa Cabanas wrote:
> So, Paul, would you recommend 4.2.1.12 as stable? I am at 4.2.1.9 (on AIX)
> and am unable to test 5.1 at this point. 4.2.1.9 to 4.2.2.12 wouldn't seem
> to be that nasty of a jump.
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 22:11, Halvorsen Geirr Gulbrand wrote:
> Hi All,
> this sounds good, and I'd like to test it.
> Do you have a link to where the software can be downloaded?
> I couldn't find it on Tivoli's (IBM) ftp site.
You won't find any full releases on the ftp site, only updates. They
h
To see how many scratch tapes in that pool run;
select count(*) from volumes \
where stgpool_name='TECH_TAPE_POOL' \
and scratch='Yes'
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 18:20, Steve Harris wrote:
> Murthy
>
> Check the maxscratch parameter on the tech_tape_pool storage pool with q stg
>tech_tape_pool f=d
Why can't AIX allow the use of the raw devices?
Suad
--
> David Longo
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/05/02 07:25AM >>>
> I decided to try using raw disk for database volumes, so I allocated
> some 10GB LUNs off our Shark.
>
> The problem is when I define
by putting them in a volume group and they came up
as 10GB OK)
Suad
--
It's apparently out now. We are at the mercy of Tivolis blindingly fast
distribution network.
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 06:48, West Suhanic wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> Any idea when the TSM server for Linux on an IA32 box will be available?
>
> regards,
> west
Any recent Intel converts?
Cheers, Suad
--
ave
code for direct SCSI copy (3rd party SCSI), in the past. The data path
would go to the TSM server then to the tape device (effectively like a
FC in-band backup).
I've read a user guide recently that points to direct device name
registration, so it may implemented.
Cheers, Suad
--
this?
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 14:36, Jason Liang wrote:
> Hi TSMers,
>
> My environment is
> Fiber SCSI
> RS/6000(TSM Server) > 2108 SAN Gateway -> 3584 LTO library.
>
>
> The TSM server worked perfectly until
carce tape drive resource.
Suad
--
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 00:54, Cook, Dwight E wrote:
> This is a real catch-22
> BIG virtual volumes means less tsm data base space tied up tracking tons of
> little virtual volumes (and files on the remote server) BUT big virtual
> volumes also means l
/workstations but get 25-35 GB/hr for db servers. I've actually got
some I/O problems myself that are begin fixed by plugging in some extra bandwidth,
so I can tell you the difference after that.
Suad
--
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 12:23:56AM +0300, Bill Smoldt wrote:
> I've gone back thr
this on our old Sun server round a year ago with a slightly smaller
DB running TSM3.7.3.
The unload ran for a similar time but the load ran for almost double the time. I
think it may have been the result of a slower disk/CPU.
Cheers, Suad
--
olors and location of the human readable
characters are at users specification."
We were looking at having a small (~6pt) font string along the top of the label,
as you would see on some commercial barcode tags, but our printer we use and quality
of our label stock discounted that.
Cheers, S
sometimes
(sessions without nodenames)
I'm in the middle of upgrading anything that looks like its patchable
to bring the system current.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 05:16:15PM +0100, Dmitri Pasyutin wrote:
> Hi Suad,
>
> You probably need to increase the MAXSESSIONS option
found.
Anyone have similar probs?
Cheers, Suad
--
I did some searching and a I found a bug, that was supposed to be fixed
in the last patch, very similar to the one I've described. (IC31961)
I'm running ATape 6.3.2.0 which has conspicuously disappeared from the ftp site.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:48:22AM -0600,
Mountretention only looks at idle tapes.
A process/session requesting a tape should normally take over a tape resource
if it's idle, regardless.
This is a possible issue of the 8 legged variety.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 11:22:11AM -0500, William Boyer wrote:
> C
;q mount" showed there was 5 idle mounts. I had to manually dismount a tape to
get it to recognise the free drive. The process has then requested and mounted a
subsequent tape.
Has anyone seen this one ?
Cheers, Suad
--
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 02:24:24PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If
t inopportune
moment. I'd say it's a bona-fide bug though.
Suad
--
(TSM4.2.0.1/AIX4.3.3)
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 05:18:08PM +0100, Jesper Matthiesen wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I think i could use a few good ideas !
>
> I have a few sessions hanging on my system looking like this :
>
And make sure you don't have locked ports down in the OS.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:09:34PM -0600, Davidson, Becky wrote:
> Make sure that under the dsm.sys they exist and then use
> dsmadmc -se= to connect
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chan, Kien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tues
Jorge,
Please turn off html editing of your e-mail messages, some of us don't
have browser capable mail readers.
Suad
--
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:01:37PM -0400, Jorge Rodriguez wrote:
Look at the cooling requirements of HP drives, apparently they caused problems
in some environments that did not have a decent air reticulation environment.
Suad
--
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 08:56:52AM -0600, Wu, Jie wrote:
> we are trying to decide what LTO drives we should purchase: HP&#
owdown when the system can't
feed a constant stream of data to the tapes.
Cheers, Suad
--
How about jfs ?
It is now on Linux ;)
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Remco Post wrote:
> Coolness,
>
> thanks for the hint. It is even in the readme, no hint about ext3 there so we
> must assume ext3 is not yet supported. Luckily ext3 is sort of ext2 r
, there was
95% read and 100% write to cache. The load hasn't significantly increased.
Any filesystem experts willing to share their opinion?
Cheers, Suad
--
Yep, in dsm.opt file
DOMAIN systemobject
It will backup the system files as well though.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:12:58PM -0300, Christian Astuni wrote:
> Hello everyone !!!
> I want to know if exist the way with TSM 4.2 to perform a backup only of
> REGISTY.
rning and no nodes are queueing for tapes and the diskpool util
is greater than 75%.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 12:46:53PM -0500, Selva, Perpetua wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone know what might be the cause of this problem?
> >
> > I h
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 11:24:24AM -0600, George Lesho wrote:
> Suad, Have you considered a strategy where you give the desktops access to
> network drives on a "few" servers that would be backed up incrementally?
> Trying to back up hundreds of desktops in a small win
an't get this other server I might farm some clients during the day
to take the load off.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 11:59:54AM +0100, Henk ten Have wrote:
> On 30-Oct-01 Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-IS/CIS wrote:
> > Andy,
> > do you mean 4.1.2.16 and not 4.1.2.6 ?
>
> Nope. 4.1.2.6 is now available:
You are both dyslexic.... 4.2.1.6
:)
Suad
--
> service.boulde
ESS via FC, I've set up a LANE ATM connection to the above sector switch
reducing routing overheads for the back-end/private traffic.
Does it sound Kosher??
Thanks, Suad
--
Suad Musovich ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Unix Support, ITSS Operations
University of Auckland
ess someone can say
otherwise?
Suad
--
***
Due to a change in the LUM tools used by TSM for licensing, the
current implementation of licensing is unable to recognize the
fact that multiple copies of a license key are in the nodelock
file.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:52:38PM -0500, Charles Ander
That will imply 3rd party SCSI copy functionality, which I haven't
seen any indication they have incorporated to TSM.
The physical data will still have to go through the TSM server, within the
SAN environment, before it gets put in a storage pool.
Suad
--
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 10:44
act[s] of the
nodes with summary of details and e-mails the admins of the policy
domains a list of the most significant sessions.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:59:33PM -0400, Marc Levitan wrote:
> I am looking for a script that will list the clients that backed up and how
> much
d a node backup failure as
there was no more scratch tapes and the other filling volumes were occupied (had
to run a listener script to detect this when it happens).
It's happened to IBM and HP branded tapes.
Anyone have the same things happen with Ultriums?
Suad
--
out an tape for off-site just mark the access to "offsite".
> 4) can i check in and check out tapes using library operation pannel.
You can, but TSM won't know about it :)
If you require Ops. to do it, use scripts and complete instructions "or" train
them up as, if it can
"numberlicenses=the_number" (I think it was) where you indicate how many
> of those licenses you purchased.
It's a bug. APAR IC30965.
The license files have not changed in 4.2. according to the packages.
Suad
--
APAR= IC30965 SER=IN INCORROUT
UNABLE TO
HP now are in the process of buying Compaq so never isn't the operative word
;)
Suad
--
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 07:02:50PM -0400, Adolph Kahan wrote:
> I don't believe that the HP support for IBM LTO is available yet. I
> could be wrong. Are the drives in the 3584 native fibre
The easiest way is to put it in a CGI executable directory (in Apache it's
a directory with ExecCGI option in the httpd.conf file) and make sure the file
has executable permissions set.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 01:00:44PM +0200, Stan Vernaillen wrote:
> Robin,
>
>
, make the individuals learn different things
and get them to draw from the others who have finished that area.
After a month, or two, you can send them to training and they will have
an appreciation of components, which makes the overview easier to understand.
My 0.02 cents worth
Cheers, Suad
Looks like you have a database inconsistency.
I had a similar problem last year and ended cleaning it up with an AUDITDB.
Check with Tivoli support to confirm this is the case (didn't have sessions
die on me so it might be a newbie)
Suad
--
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 10:55:06AM +0200, Rei
30kB/s. When I killed the 2nd restore session it speed up.
Similarly, later that evening, the system decided to migrate data to that
same volume and it did the same thing.
Bug/feature?
Cheers, Suad
--
dget, it's for you.
If I was to repeat the exercise of choosing from scratch again, I would pick
LTO. We can't afford 3590 and we have lost confidence in DLT.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:07:02AM -0400, Bill Wheeler wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have seen o
i don't see a reply, so I can answer.
Yes, there is an old ADSM client for linux, which was unsupported but
worked OK. Just do a search for it on google.
You should be able to run the newer clients but am unsure about licensing
issues.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 12:06:24PM
barking up the wrong tree.
(http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/afs/downloads.html)
Anybody been through this?
Suad
--
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:55:40PM -0400, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
> What EXACTLY do you mean by VGA ?As in 640x480x256colors or anything
> less than SVGA or XVGA ?
Careful, it might be a ploy to supplement their new creative licensing
scheme.
Suad
--
(We use crappy Wyse terminals)
Are you talking about frame as in cabinet?
Is it not the library firmware at fault in this case?
Suad
--
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 07:38:12AM -0500, Jeff Bach wrote:
> There is a problem with 1550. It effects the 3rd and 4th frame in the
> library. The robot spazes out. We found it las
aning more towards the SAN
side of things? (e.g. switches, routers, connectivity, management, security etc.)
How about a SAN list dominated by Shark people? :)
(as I can't really see any but vendor/dealer controlled ones)
Suad
--
el (latest is 1550)
http://ssddom01.storage.ibm.com/techsup/swtechsup.nsf/support/ultriumfmr_ftp
Cheers, Suad
--
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:47:49PM -0500, Sam Schrage wrote:
> We purchased a IBM 3583 LTO in Jan, 2001. We've had 2 tape drives replaced
> already and a third
Rather than using DRIVE for the format type in the devclass, try use ULTRIUM.
Suad
--
>On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 02:49:51PM +0200, Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 wrote:
> Suad
>
> it is the first time
>
> root@pat0008 # tapeutil -f /dev/rmt0 inquiry
> Issuing inquiry...
>
Can you do a "tapeutil -f /dev/rmt0 inquiry" ? (i.e. can you see it from AIX?)
Has it worked before?
If it hasn't, can you send the library/devclass/drive defs.
Suad
--
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 01:29:49PM +0200, Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 wrote:
> Hi
>
> Equipment
The TSMXX.README.SRV file has the instructions to set up the LTO library/drives.
Yes, you should use /dev/smc0 as the library controller device.
Suad
--
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 03:09:44PM -0500, Jeff Bach wrote:
> HELP
> I need some specific help on defining a new LTO libr
For the archive option I was going to set date specific directories
(e.g. /staging/2001/06/02/) rather than unique filenames.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 09:17:23AM -0400, David Longo wrote:
> One question pops up to consider in the planning. Do the files they put in the
>s
them up.
They want a 30day retention period with one backup a month kept for a year (acheived
by a management class flag on dsmc)
Question:
Should we run incrementals or archive the files considering we have a date, as
opposed to frequency, retention requirement?
Suad
--
The install readme says use ultrium or ultriumc.
Also, as Richard mentioned, look at the microcode on the drives.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 02:18:23PM +0100, Fab System wrote:
> All
>
> We have 4 LTO drives in a 3584 libary which is connected using a SAN Data
> Gat
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
