Re: Checked in volumes could not be mounted

2004-08-11 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Ted Byrne wrote: > >if you've read my previous posts, I've written that I'm checking in > >volumes with checklabel=barcode that means all volumes are barcoded and I > >think that also means there is nothing to label. Or am I wrong? > > The cartridges may well have barcode labe

Re: Checked in volumes could not be mounted

2004-08-11 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Bill Dourado wrote: > "backup db dev=sdltdrive vol= type=full > scratch=yes), tsm fails with error message (Mount request denied for > volume - volume not available.)" > > Do a q vol f=d to check out "access", it may be "offsite" or > "readonly" these volumes are not defi

Re: Checked in volumes could not be mounted

2004-08-10 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Ted Byrne wrote: > At 12:55 PM 8/10/2004, you wrote: > >Anyway 'label libvol search=yes labels=b checkin=scratch' says 0 > >volumes labeled, 0 volumes checked in. > > Well > > label libvolume will not process tapes that are already checked into the > library, which, if I

Re: Checked in volumes could not be mounted

2004-08-10 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Richard Sims wrote: > ... > > Case: q libvol gives list of volumes in library. some of them can be used > > for backup but some of them no. ... > > The simple cause could be that the tapes were not internally labeled, > which would be done via Label Libvolume or dsmlabel opera

Re: Checked in volumes could not be mounted

2004-08-10 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Tomas Nalevajko wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm encountering problems by our client with checked in volumes. Could > someone suggest me some actions in this case? Or did someone see similar > case before? Many thanks. > > Case: q libvol gives list of volume

Checked in volumes could not be mounted

2004-08-10 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
Hi all, I'm encountering problems by our client with checked in volumes. Could someone suggest me some actions in this case? Or did someone see similar case before? Many thanks. Case: q libvol gives list of volumes in library. some of them can be used for backup but some of them no. I identified

Re: RMAN type sbt_tape?

2004-01-17 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, bab wrote: > Hi, > I am taking backup from tdp client of Oracle database,RMAN type should be > "sbt_tape"? is it possible to I can specify type DISK.I want backup should go to > diskpool and then data should migrate to tapepool.My copygroup- copy distination is > pointing d

Re: Oracle9i on RH 7.2

2003-09-17 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Natthakriss Mathanom wrote: > Dear all >I have some question? I have Oracle9i on RH7.2 server ,I want > to use RMAN, TSM's can support oracle9i on linux >Pls anwser me, Thank you. it was a question? If you have non IBM backup device you'll need TSM modu

Re: TDP for Oracle on Linux 6.2 or 7.3

2003-08-22 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Le Minh Hieu wrote: > Hi everybody ! > We know that TSM 5.1.5 only support TDP for Oracle on Linux Advanced Server 2.1. But > did anyone test TDP for Oracle on Linux 6.2 or 7.3 ? as remember correctly, some time ago we were deploying backup management and we had to deploy ts

Re: Unix & TSM

2003-08-19 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Dabney James wrote: > I was asked today by management if a Unix box (TSM Server) can have more > than one tape library attached to it and successfully perform a backup? I sure, tsm servers could share libraries among themselves as good as backup to more than one library. what