;t see this listed in the APAR, but that parameter also seems to
> be incorrectly documented then, right?
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: woensdag 18 januari 2006 16:50
> To: ADS
ndest regards,
Eric van Loon
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 18 januari 2006 16:50
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: -nodename no longer there for UNIX...
Hi Eric,
Nope, -tcpserveraddress is also not valid from the command line.
In
Eric van Loon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: woensdag 18 januari 2006 14:50
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: -nodename no longer there for UNIX...
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Of course, NODENAME remains a valid option for
GC32-0789-05 states that it is a valid option...
Thank you very much for your help!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 18 januari 2006 14:50
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: -nodename no longer there for UNIX
Hi Eric,
Of course, NODENAME remains a valid option for the dsm.sys file. It has
never been valid from the command line. IC46024 seems to refer to only a
doc error.
You can try -VIRTUALNODENAME from the command line
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client De
Eric -
The proper option to use for that purpose is -VIRTUALNodename.
See "Restore or retrieve files to another workstation" in the client
manual.
Richard Sims
On Jan 18, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
Hi *SM-ers!
Does anybody know why IBM decided to drop the -nodename pa
Hi *SM-ers!
Does anybody know why IBM decided to drop the -nodename parameter for
the UNIX clients?
I discovered that this parameter no longer works in 5.3. It's documented
in the manuals but that's not correct (IC46024).
I'm trying to find a way to give our standby a way to restore data from
anoth
