Has anyone tried 6.2.4.0 server yet? We are planning on upgrading to that
version from 6.2.3.100.
IBM has suggested we go to that version due to a DB reorg bug.
Andy Huebner
This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally
privileged. If you are not an intended
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 3:02 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] 6.2.4.0 Server
Has anyone tried 6.2.4.0 server yet? We are planning on upgrading to that
y Services
harold.vandeven...@ks.gov
(785) 296-0631
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 2:02 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] 6.2.4.0 Server
Has anyone tried 6.2.
almost one month no issues up to now ...
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
wrote:
> Has anyone tried 6.2.4.0 server yet? We are planning on upgrading to that
> version from 6.2.3.100.
> IBM has suggested we go to that version due to a DB reorg bug.
ty of Washington School of Medicine
On 06/19/12 12:02 PM, Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT wrote:
Has anyone tried 6.2.4.0 server yet? We are planning on upgrading to that
version from 6.2.3.100.
IBM has suggested we go to that version due to a DB reorg bug.
Andy Huebner
This e-mail (includin
