On Feb 1, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Sam Sheppard wrote:
Top of message
--> 02-01-08 14:42 S.SHEPPARD (SHS)Re: ADSM-L Win2K3 backu
Can I infer from you comments that you find the FILE DEVCLASS to be a
better performer? This is
Top of message
>>--> 02-01-08 14:42 S.SHEPPARD (SHS) Re: ADSM-L Win2K3 backu
Can I infer from you comments that you find the FILE DEVCLASS to be a
better performer? This is our first server on Unix; our other 2 TSM
se
;
02/01/2008 02:33 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] ADSM-L Win2K3 backu
Top of message
>>--> 02-01-08 11:29 S.SHEPPARD (SHS)Re: ADSM-L Win2
Top of message
>>--> 02-01-08 11:29 S.SHEPPARD (SHS) Re: ADSM-L Win2K3 backu
Looks like the problem is with our disk pool. I ran a test directly to
LTO3 tape and performance improved dramatically, anywhere from 40 to
