places
that do various bits and pieces of some of this and that
"Allen S. Rout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
04/29/2008 09:37 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM
ive system monitoring tools for Linux (I miss
Omegamon!)
Andy Huebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 04/28/2008
03:56 PM Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] DB Bufferpool sizing - conti
>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:12:57 -0400, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
> All disk are internal. We needed quantity vs speed (more for the LZ than
> DB) so we didn't have a choice (Dell) other than the big SATA drives
> (biggest SAS was around 300GB).
> Unfortunately (please co
or Linux (I miss
> Omegamon!)
>
>
>
> Andy Huebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> 04/28/2008 03:56 PM
> Please respond to
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
> To
> ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> cc
>
M
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] DB Bufferpool sizing - continued
AIX 5.3
DS4700 Disks
TSM 5.3.4.2
TSM Databases are not mirrored
TSM DB Disks are equally configured, LUNs are 36Gb size
LOGS are mirrored, LUNs are 14Gb size
monitoring tools for Linux (I miss
Omegamon!)
Andy Huebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
04/28/2008 03:56 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] DB Bufferpool sizing - continued
fferent and depend mainly on the number of
objects to manage.
Regards
Pierre
> -Message d'origine-
> De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De
> la part de Andy Huebner
> Envoyé : lundi 28 avril 2008 21:53
> À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Objet : Re:
er"
04/28/2008 11:45 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] DB Bufferpool sizing - continued
Zoltan-
We also run TSM on a dedicated Linux/Intel, although on a smaller scale
than you. The server has 2.5GB RAM and two 2GH
vid E Ehresman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
04/28/2008 01:28 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] DB Bufferpool sizing - continued
Our tsm runs on a p550 with 4 processors and 8 GB
Our tsm runs on a p550 with 4 processors and 8 GB of memory running Aix 5.3.
The DB is 131,072 MB and is 64% utilized. Bufpoolsize is 1024 MB. Expirations
average around 3 hours.
>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/28/2008 10:41 AM >>>
Pertaining to the recent discussion of buffpoo
008 11:45 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] DB Bufferpool sizing - continued
Zoltan-
We also run TSM on a dedicated Linux/Intel, although on a smaller scale
than you. The server has 2.5GB RAM and two 2GHz Xeons. Our DB
get processed during your expiration runs? We're in
the magnitude of 10s of thousands of objects.
-Ken
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 10:41 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subj
Pertaining to the recent discussion of buffpool sizing (larger vs smaller
- cpu usage, etc) I would like to get some opinions.
I followed the discussion and was aware of the issue of going too large
and killing any benefits by increased CPU usage and such.
So, I have been experimenting.
My big L
13 matches
Mail list logo
