On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:11:15 -0500, you wrote:
>I am just going to 3590K. I use client compression on everything. I
>compress on the tape drives also.
Not exactly on topic here, but you actually lose throughput when you
run compression on both ends of the process. You're better off with
tape co
Quoting David DeCuir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> additional info if it helps:
> data per tape is either all NT or all UNIX
> mostly small files on NT
> about half small files on UNIX and half Oracle database files (2-20gb)
>
> The reason I ask is that my best guess seems to be such a wide range -
> I
cc:(bcc: Robin Sharpe/WA/USR/SHG)
06/20/01 Subject:
11:39 AM Re: Data on my tapes
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
David,
for w
DB_TPOOL TAPE3590K35,887.2 100.0Full
>
>H00937DB_TPOOL TAPE3590K35,786.8 100.0Full
>
>H00938DB_TPOOL TAPE3590K35,710.0 100.0Full
>
>
>Jeff Bach
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From:
ent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 10:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Data on my tapes
>
> >Ok, how much data are you getting on a 3590 "K" tape.
>
> David - A rough visual average that I see on my full tapes is 58 GB,
> in backup and copy s
--Original Message-
From: David DeCuir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Data on my tapes
Hello,
Ok, how much data are you getting on a 3590 "K" tape. From reading past
posts, I know the Pct Util and Est. Capacity metho
>Ok, how much data are you getting on a 3590 "K" tape.
David - A rough visual average that I see on my full tapes is 58 GB,
in backup and copy storage pools. (If using HSM, expect
much less, because it doesn't Aggregate.)
Richard Sims, BU
Hello,
Ok, how much data are you getting on a 3590 "K" tape. From reading past
posts, I know the Pct Util and Est. Capacity method is suspect at best. All
I need is an average you guys have seen using the following:
assume the tape is full and has had no files expired or reclaimed
3590 E1A drive
