ADSM-L] Determining devclass FILE values (a.k.a. New Server - Part
Deux)
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> Just in case I don't completely understand the pros/cons of FILE vs
DISK, I plan to use this > 5.3TB SAN disk space the same way I am using
DISK on my other servers - L
d data straight to a Datadomain 880.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Stef
Coene
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:28 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Determining devclass FILE values (a.k.a. New Server -
Part
On Wednesday 22 September 2010, you wrote:
> On Friday 17 September 2010, Stef Coene wrote:
> > When we changed the FILE based storage pool to 5 GB volumes, the result
> > was
>
> much better. There was less reclamation needed because it is less likely
> that a volume has a status Filling.
>
>
> I
On Friday 17 September 2010, Stef Coene wrote:
> When we changed the FILE based storage pool to 5 GB volumes, the result was
much better. There was less reclamation needed because it is less likely that
a volume has a status Filling.
Interesting concept Stef...just the opposite of what I did to
On Sep 22, 2010, at 7:17 AM, Stefan Folkerts wrote:
> De performance of a disk based storagepool will be fine at the start but will
> degrade over time due to fragmentation, I have seen this happen on large
> permanent use diskpools.
I think this is particularly an issue with TSM volumes implem
Onderwerp: Re: [ADSM-L] Determining devclass FILE values (a.k.a. New Server -
Part Deux)
>Also, do you have a (fast) DISK based volume in front of the FILE storage
>pool? We do this >so we can allow lots of client backups coming in and use
>the number of migration processes >to c
e printing this Email
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Stef
Coene
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:29 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Determining devclass FILE values (a.k.a. New Server -
Part Deux)
On Fri
On Friday 17 September 2010, you wrote:
> From the few responses I got about 6.1.4.x vs 6.2.1.1 for a new server,
> the responses leaned to 6.2.x.
>
> With that decision made, the next is laying out the structure of storage
> pools and such.
>
> Most discussions/directions from here/IBM say that D
o:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Johnny
Lea
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 6:30 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Determining devclass FILE values (a.k.a. New Server -
Part Deux)
I am using file class on datadomain albeit 5.5.3. Initially I set the maxcap
at 25GB. This s
> Just in case I don't completely understand the pros/cons of FILE vs DISK, I
> plan to use this > 5.3TB SAN disk space the same way I am using DISK on my
> other servers - LZfor > incoming backups and then migrate to
> disk.Folks keep talking about reclamation of their > FILE d
vegne av Johnny Lea
Sendt: ti 2010-09-21 17:30
Til: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Emne: Re: Determining devclass FILE values (a.k.a. New Server - Part Deux)
I am using file class on datadomain albeit 5.5.3. Initially I set the maxcap
at 25GB. This seemed to work OK except my reclamation is getting out
orray/AC/VCU
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:04 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Determining devclass FILE values (a.k.a. New Server -
Part Deux)
So, what did you increase the size to?
Just in case I don't completely understand the pros/cons of FILE vs DISK,
I plan t
DSM-L] Determining devclass FILE values (a.k.a. New Server - Part
Deux)
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
I am using file class on datadomain albeit 5.5.3. Initially I set the
maxcap at 25GB. This seemed to work OK except my reclamation is getting
out of hand. For example a 200GB fil
DSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Determining devclass FILE values (a.k.a. New Server -
Part Deux)
>So, have you migrated to devclass FILE?
I have migrated most of primary pools to devc/stgpool FILE and found
them perfect (it was done as a preparation to use de-duplication in 6.x, by
>So, have you migrated to devclass FILE?
I have migrated most of primary pools to devc/stgpool FILE and found
them perfect (it was done as a preparation to use de-duplication in 6.x, by the
way am still 5.5.4). It is good from any point of view(backup, restore, making
tape copies, etc).
>From the few responses I got about 6.1.4.x vs 6.2.1.1 for a new server,
the responses leaned to 6.2.x.
With that decision made, the next is laying out the structure of storage
pools and such.
Most discussions/directions from here/IBM say that DEVCLASS FILE is the
way to go vs defining fixed sto
16 matches
Mail list logo
