Very interesting. I figured if the API allowed it then the TDP would already be
using multiple stripes\sections.
Thanks
Del Hoobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kyle,
It is 4 storage groups per server/5 databases per storage group.
> A question for Del: Will the TDP for Exchange ever have a str
Kyle,
It is 4 storage groups per server/5 databases per storage group.
> A question for Del: Will the TDP for Exchange ever have a striping
> feature like the TDP for SQL or is that a Microsoft limitation with
> Exchange -vs- SQL.
This is a current Microsoft API limitation. Interestingly, there
With Exchange 2003 I can't remember if it is up to 4 storage groups per server
with 5 databases each or if its the other way around. Anyway, while I don't
condone using 1 TB pluse storage groups. Groups much larger than 200 GB are
going to exist out there.
I would just add that using LANFree b
> These are conservative stats. The customer I'm adminning TSM for right
> now got one of last night's information store backups (of 82.8GB) in
> 8440 seconds--almost 10MB/sec--on a 10/100 network.
My Exchange backup last night was 65.9GB in 1537 seconds (that's about
40 MB/s over a 1Gb/s network
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of fred johanson
>The guys next door are rolling out our pilot project Exchange
>server. Right now they're comfortable with the TDP and its
>capabilities. For the near future, differential backups with
>an occasional
>full backup
The guys next door are rolling out our pilot project Exchange
server. Right now they're comfortable with the TDP and its
capabilities. For the near future, differential backups with an occasional
full backup to truncate the Exchange log will suffice. But they wonder
what happens when they move f