PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
Here here. I'll reiterate: the data must be stored in the lowest common
denominator format. No databases, no strange and wondrous binary formats.
Simple text is the best. That's why microfiche is still us
ashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/27/179205&art_pos=2
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/technology/business-computing/27disk.html?_r=1
-Original Message-
From: Len Boyle
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 4:49 PM
To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Subject: RE: LTO for long term archiving
Over ten y
8777 x7105
www.storserver.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Kauffman, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 7:38 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
Soapbox time.
The media is not important
able
to read it, and there is probably not gonna be anyone around that was
there when the app was written ;)
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
From:
"Kauffman, Tom"
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
2009-05-06 15:37
Subject:
Re: LTO for long term archiving
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager&q
May 05, 2009 5:34 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: LTO for long term archiving
>
> I truly doubt that archiving drives, servers and tapes for 25 years
> each
> time the technology updates will let you read the tapes because the
> drive and server will probably not e
M.MARIST.EDU
Dist Stor cc
Manager"
Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term
archiving
06/05/2009 07:34
AM
Please respond to
&
lly Lipp
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 1:42 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
I like the implication, but I'm pretty sure somebody actually thought
being able to read the information would have been a good idea.
Kelly Lipp
CTO
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkt
mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Huebschman, George J.
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 3:25 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
Does anyone have 25 year old tape media or tape drives around?
Will you stil be able to use LTOx media in 25 years?
-Origin
Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Remco
Post
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 2:39 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
I do agree, having the tapedrives around _could_ be important. I know
of at least one environment that was ab
, 2009 4:11 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
I work for a large hospital. I have been asked to investigate possible
configurations for archiving something between a few hundred terabytes
and a petabyte of data for 25 years. This would be clinical records
that
w
Huebschman, George J." [gjhuebsch...@lmus.leggmason.com]
Gesendet: 05.05.2009 16:25 AST
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
Does anyone have 25 year old tape media or tape drives around?
Will you stil be able to use LTOx media in 25 years?
-Original Me
VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
Does anyone have 25 year old tape media or tape drives around?
Will you stil be able to use LTOx media in 25 years?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Thomas Denier
Sent: T
Subject: [ADSM-L] LTO for long term archiving
I work for a large hospital. I have been asked to investigate possible
configurations for archiving something between a few hundred terabytes
and a petabyte of data for 25 years. This would be clinical records that
we need to keep in case of a malpractice
On May 5, 2009, at 22:10 , Thomas Denier wrote:
As far as I can tell, the most expensive part of such a
configuration is the media, and LTO media will cost about a third
as much as the most economical MagStar media (extended length 3592
volumes read and written with TS1130 drives). With th
I work for a large hospital. I have been asked to investigate
possible configurations for archiving something between a few
hundred terabytes and a petabyte of data for 25 years. This would
be clinical records that we need to keep in case of a malpractice
suit. The retention period is 25 years beca
15 matches
Mail list logo
