Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-20 Thread Zoltan Forray
li 2022 22:46 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures > > Hi, the following flash is published for this issue. > > https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6605073 > > Best regards, > > Andy > > Andrew Raib

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-19 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Tuesday, 19 July, 2022 07:05 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures Hi Michael, The APAR is IT41452. It is not yet visible on the web, but it should be in the next day or two. Then, until the APAR is closed, you need to log in with your

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-19 Thread Michael Roesch
> stor...@us.ibm.com > > IBM > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Michael > Roesch > Sent: Thursday, 14 July, 2022 06:23 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures > > Hi, >

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-19 Thread Andrew Raibeck
IBM -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Michael Roesch Sent: Tuesday, 19 July, 2022 05:30 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures Hi all, Did IBM already create an APAR for this issue? We're currently ho

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-19 Thread Michael Roesch
le ulimit setting back to its original value. > > 6. Open a case with IBM and provide the service trace, dsmc output (or > dsmsched.log if you schedule the operation), dsmerror.log, and the files > collected from the article of step 4. > > You can remove the core file after the data is

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-14 Thread Andrew Raibeck
f Of Zoltan Forray Sent: Thursday, 14 July, 2022 08:04 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures Andy, You said *"- The client is configured for automatic failover to a replication server"* but that doesn't jive with our situatio

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-14 Thread Zoltan Forray
> Sent: Thursday, 14 July, 2022 06:23 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures > > Hi, > > Does the client for AIX show this problem as well? Did this happen on x64 > Linux or also on PPC? > > Kind regards > Mi

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-14 Thread Andrew Raibeck
@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures Hi, Does the client for AIX show this problem as well? Did this happen on x64 Linux or also on PPC? Kind regards Michael Roesch On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 4:19 AM Saravanan Palanisamy < evergreen.sa...@gmail.com>

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-14 Thread Michael Roesch
. > >>> > >>> I am sure it will be mitigated soon. > >>> > >>> Feel free to open a fresh IBM Support case so you can be quickly > >> notified once it is fixed. > >>> > >>> > >>> Del > >>> >

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-12 Thread Saravanan Palanisamy
t;>> >>> Feel free to open a fresh IBM Support case so you can be quickly >> notified once it is fixed. >>> >>> >>> Del >>> >>> >>> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of >> Zo

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-12 Thread Tom Alverson
ated soon. > > > > Feel free to open a fresh IBM Support case so you can be quickly > notified once it is fixed. > > > > > > Del > > > > > > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of > Zoltan Forray > > Se

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-12 Thread Saravanan Palanisamy
on behalf of Zoltan > Forray > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 1:56 PM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: [EXTERNAL] 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures > > We started rolling out the 8.1.15 Linux client via apogee and many clients > are failing with: >

Re: 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-12 Thread Del Hoobler
orray Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 1:56 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] 8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures We started rolling out the 8.1.15 Linux client via apogee and many clients are failing with: *** Error in `dsmc': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x00

8.1.15 Linux client update causing failures

2022-07-12 Thread Zoltan Forray
We started rolling out the 8.1.15 Linux client via apogee and many clients are failing with: *** Error in `dsmc': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x02baf970 *** The only matching Google hit goes back to a V7 client issue - long fixed. At first I thought it might be related

Re: 8.1.2+ Linux client and file rights in /etc/adsm

2018-08-15 Thread Zoltan Forray
s/home/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2018-08-14 > 20:13:56: > > > From: Tandon Kadambala > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > Date: 2018-08-14 20:16 > > Subject: Re: 8.1.2+ Linux client and file rights in /etc/adsm >

Re: 8.1.2+ Linux client and file rights in /etc/adsm

2018-08-15 Thread Andrew Raibeck
: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2018-08-14 20:13:56: > From: Tandon Kadambala > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 2018-08-14 20:16 > Subject: Re: 8.1.2+ Linux client and file rights

Re: 8.1.2+ Linux client and file rights in /etc/adsm

2018-08-14 Thread Tandon Kadambala
Hi, We have give chmod 777 TSM* and spcli* We checked netzza db backups all working fine. Without full permissions it won't work Thanks and regards, Tandon K TSM Administrator, IBM India Pvt LTD., On Wed, Aug 15, 2018, 5:43 AM Tandon Kadambala wrote: > Hi, > > We have give chmod 777 TSM* and

Re: 8.1.2+ Linux client and file rights in /etc/adsm

2018-08-14 Thread Tandon Kadambala
Hi, We have give chmod 777 TSM* and spcli* We checked netzza db backups all working fine. Without full permissions it won't work Thanks and regards, Tandon K TSM Administrator, IBM India Pvt LTD., On Wed, Aug 15, 2018, 12:58 AM Zoltan Forray wrote: > Can someone point me to a document that

8.1.2+ Linux client and file rights in /etc/adsm

2018-08-14 Thread Zoltan Forray
Can someone point me to a document that lists the minimum file rights required for files in /etc/adsm? Our security/scanning process is barking about file in /etc/adsm having world/global rights and we need to either justify or remove those rights: /etc/adsm] -rw-rw-rw-. 1 root root80 Sep 13

Re: 8.1 Linux client and IT13701 causing heartburn

2017-01-30 Thread Zoltan Forray
Thank you for the information. I check weekly for client/server patches so I will keep an eye open for this APAR update. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Heinz Flemming wrote: > According to Zoltan Forray > > Heinz > > > > Have you heard anything back from IBM on your PMR? I just had anothe

Re: 8.1 Linux client and IT13701 causing heartburn

2017-01-30 Thread Heinz Flemming
According to Zoltan Forray > Heinz > > Have you heard anything back from IBM on your PMR? I just had another > user call with the same problem, except that they ran traces to figure out > where it was failing and the directory it stops on does not have but a few > sub/nested directories. Fortu

Re: 8.1 Linux client and IT13701 causing heartburn

2017-01-26 Thread Zoltan Forray
Heinz Have you heard anything back from IBM on your PMR? I just had another user call with the same problem, except that they ran traces to figure out where it was failing and the directory it stops on does not have but a few sub/nested directories. Fortunately, the TESTFLAGS workaround seems

Re: 8.1 Linux client and IT13701 causing heartburn

2017-01-10 Thread Heinz Flemming
According to Zoltan Forray > Thanks you for confirming this and opening the PMR. > > I have passed the "workaround" to the user who first discovered the "issue" > to see if it fixes his problem. I hope a patch comes out soon that allows > us to choose this upper-limit. > > Can you post the PMR num

Re: 8.1 Linux client and IT13701 causing heartburn

2017-01-05 Thread Zoltan Forray
low it? On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Heinz Flemming wrote: > According to Zoltan Forray > > I have a user who after upgrading their Linux client to 8.1 now has a > > problem with backups stopping suddenly due to APAR IT13701 whose fix is > in > > the 8.1 client. >

Re: 8.1 Linux client and IT13701 causing heartburn

2017-01-05 Thread Heinz Flemming
According to Zoltan Forray > I have a user who after upgrading their Linux client to 8.1 now has a > problem with backups stopping suddenly due to APAR IT13701 whose fix is in > the 8.1 client. > > Before upgrading to 8.1, the backups ran fine. > > I have gone back and forth

8.1 Linux client and IT13701 causing heartburn

2017-01-03 Thread Zoltan Forray
I have a user who after upgrading their Linux client to 8.1 now has a problem with backups stopping suddenly due to APAR IT13701 whose fix is in the 8.1 client. Before upgrading to 8.1, the backups ran fine. I have gone back and forth with them about this being a "fix", not a probl

Re: Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client

2015-04-21 Thread Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann SIMON Sent: dinsdag 21 april 2015 15:00 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client Hello Eric, TIVsm-filepath contains a kernel module used by tsmjbbd (TIVsm-JBB) and each is specif

Re: Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client

2015-04-21 Thread Erwann SIMON
- Mail original - De: "EJ van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 21 Avril 2015 10:33:37 Objet: [ADSM-L] Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client Hi TSM-ers! Has anybody been able to upgrade their 7.1 Linux client to 7.1.2.0 on RedHat 5? When I try to upgr

Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client

2015-04-21 Thread Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Hi TSM-ers! Has anybody been able to upgrade their 7.1 Linux client to 7.1.2.0 on RedHat 5? When I try to upgrade it I receive the following error: error: Failed dependencies: rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 is needed by TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <=

Re: Upgrading a Linux client

2014-05-15 Thread Erwann Simon
2014 15:04:31 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrading a Linux client For Linux clients, I've always had to remove (rpm -e) and install (rpm ivh or rpm -Uvh) the client rpms. If upgrade now works without a remove first, I'd love to know at what client level that started. David -Original Mes

Re: Upgrading a Linux client

2014-05-15 Thread Ehresman,David E.
MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Remco Post Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 1:54 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrading a Linux client what he said, or rpm -Uhv will maybe do (-U for upgrade, -i for install), h for nice hash marks as a progress bar and v for not Very quiet ;-) Op 14 me

Re: Upgrading a Linux client

2014-05-14 Thread Remco Post
what he said, or rpm -Uhv will maybe do (-U for upgrade, -i for install), h for nice hash marks as a progress bar and v for not Very quiet ;-) Op 14 mei 2014, om 16:19 heeft Erwann Simon het volgende geschreven: > Eric, > > You need to uninstall (rpm -e) and then reinstall (rpm -i). > > >

Re: Upgrading a Linux client

2014-05-14 Thread Erwann Simon
Eric, You need to uninstall (rpm -e) and then reinstall (rpm -i). On 14 mai 2014 16:17:02 CEST, "Loon, EJ van (SPLXM) - KLM" wrote: >Hi guys! >I'm not really an Linux expert, but I'm trying to upgrade a 6.2 client >to 7.1 on a Linux nodes. When I follow the commands from the manual to >instal

Upgrading a Linux client

2014-05-14 Thread Loon, EJ van (SPLXM) - KLM
Hi guys! I'm not really an Linux expert, but I'm trying to upgrade a 6.2 client to 7.1 on a Linux nodes. When I follow the commands from the manual to install the API client (rpm -i TIVsm-API64.x86_64.rpm) it fails with several of the following messages: file /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/api/

Re: Linux client questions

2012-02-14 Thread Erwann Simon
;Gary Lee" À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mardi 14 Février 2012 16:57:34 Objet: [ADSM-L] Linux client questions Is the current linuxx86 client 64 bit, 32, or both? All of my linuxes are 64 bit, but another department has some 32 bit systems out there and was asking. I didn't see any r

Re: Linux client questions

2012-02-14 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
SM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 02/14/2012 11:19 AM Subject:[ADSM-L] Linux client questions Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Is the current linuxx86 client 64 bit, 32, or both? All of my linuxes are 64 bit, but another department has some 32 bit systems out there and was

Linux client questions

2012-02-14 Thread Lee, Gary
Is the current linuxx86 client 64 bit, 32, or both? All of my linuxes are 64 bit, but another department has some 32 bit systems out there and was asking. I didn't see any reference on the tsm client download site. Thanks for any assistance. Gary Lee Senior System Programmer Ball State Unive

linux client

2012-01-04 Thread Tim Brown
Does the x86 linux client support SUSE Linux SLES 10 SP2 Thanks, Tim Brown Systems Specialist - Project Leader Central Hudson Gas & Electric 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Email: tbr...@cenhud.com <<mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com>> Phone: 845-486-5643 Fax: 845-486-5921 Ce

Re: Problems backing up Linux client - missed filesystem

2011-12-12 Thread Richard Sims
If your scheduler is not running under CAD, any changes made to dsm.sys and dsm.opt will not be known to that scheduler process until it is restarted. You should also review the output of 'dsmc q opt' and 'dsmc q inclexcl' for containing what you actually want, as "compiled" specifications. An

Re: Problems backing up Linux client - missed filesystem

2011-12-12 Thread Minns, Farren - Chichester
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Problems backing up Linux client - missed filesystem Have you checked your dsmsched.log on the client for errors? Have you checked your tsm server actlog for the same time period for informative messages? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM

Re: Problems backing up Linux client - missed filesystem

2011-12-12 Thread Ehresman,David E.
, December 12, 2011 12:01 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Problems backing up Linux client - missed filesystem OK, thanks for the advice. Regards Farren -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Thomas Denier Sent: 12

Re: Problems backing up Linux client - missed filesystem

2011-12-12 Thread Minns, Farren - Chichester
OK, thanks for the advice. Regards Farren -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Thomas Denier Sent: 12 December 2011 16:49 To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Problems backing up Linux client - missed filesystem

Re: Problems backing up Linux client - missed filesystem

2011-12-12 Thread Thomas Denier
-Farren Minns wrote: - >TSM Server 5.5.2.0 on Solaris > >Linux Client 5.5.0.0 - Real Application Cluster v6 > >I have the following issue. When the backup runs as a scheduled >service it only checks/backs up the /boot filesystem. > >I put the following in dsm.sys a

Problems backing up Linux client - missed filesystem

2011-12-12 Thread Minns, Farren - Chichester
Hi All TSM Server 5.5.2.0 on Solaris Linux Client 5.5.0.0 - Real Application Cluster v6 I have the following issue. When the backup runs as a scheduled service it only checks/backs up the /boot filesystem. I put the following in dsm.sys and that certainly allows me to run manual

Re: linux client and TSM gui

2011-06-03 Thread Richard van Denzel
The Linux client is installed in /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin. I've had it working using dsmj and XMing as the X-Windows server. Richard. 2011/6/2 Remco Post > On 2 jun 2011, at 15:02, Tim Brown wrote: > > > Even if I export the display doesn't the dsm executable hav

Re: linux client and TSM gui

2011-06-02 Thread Remco Post
On 2 jun 2011, at 15:02, Tim Brown wrote: > Even if I export the display doesn't the dsm executable have to reside > On the linux client. I don't see the dsm executable in the bin folder 'the bin' folder? I assume you mean /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin ? the gui

Re: linux client and TSM gui

2011-06-02 Thread Mark Mooney
It might be dsmj then. Tim Brown wrote: Even if I export the display doesn't the dsm executable have to reside On the linux client. I don't see the dsm executable in the bin folder On linux Tim -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU]

Re: linux client and TSM gui

2011-06-02 Thread Tim Brown
Even if I export the display doesn't the dsm executable have to reside On the linux client. I don't see the dsm executable in the bin folder On linux Tim -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Mooney Sent: Thursda

Re: linux client and TSM gui

2011-06-02 Thread Rick Adamson
al Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tim Brown Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 8:35 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] linux client and TSM gui Is there a way to run a TSM GUI session on Linux, I am able to run the command line interface.

Re: linux client and TSM gui

2011-06-02 Thread Robert J Molerio
If that dosent work try dsmj after exporting your display variable. On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Tim Brown wrote: > Is there a way to run a TSM GUI session on Linux, I am able to run the > command line interface. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tim Brown > Systems Specialist - Project Leader > Centra

Re: linux client and TSM gui

2011-06-02 Thread Mark Mooney
DSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: linux client and TSM gui Is there a way to run a TSM GUI session on Linux, I am able to run the command line interface. Thanks, Tim Brown Systems Specialist - Project Leader Central Hudson Gas & Electric 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Email: tbr...@cenhud.com <

linux client and TSM gui

2011-06-02 Thread Tim Brown
Is there a way to run a TSM GUI session on Linux, I am able to run the command line interface. Thanks, Tim Brown Systems Specialist - Project Leader Central Hudson Gas & Electric 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Email: tbr...@cenhud.com <> Phone: 845-486-5643 Fa

Re: Ang: linux client for RHES v3

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Rhodes
Thanks! I pulled the 5.3.6.7 client from the ftp site Daniel listed.I had thought all the FTP sites were gone . . . I'm glad one is still around. Rick From: Erwann SIMON To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 05/18/2011 03:53 PM Subject:Re: Ang: linux client for RHES v3 Se

Re: linux client for RHES v3

2011-05-19 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
y.vcu.edu/phishing.html From: Richard Rhodes To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 05/18/2011 03:20 PM Subject: [ADSM-L] linux client for RHES v3 Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi everyone, We have just found that we have to start TSM backups of a RedHat Enterprise Linux ES Release 3 serv

Re: Ang: linux client for RHES v3

2011-05-18 Thread Erwann SIMON
n: Richard Rhodes Sänt av: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Datum: 05/18/2011 21:18 Ärende: linux client for RHES v3 Hi everyone, We have just found that we have to start TSM backups of a RedHat Enterprise Linux ES Release 3 server (that's what I'm told the version is).

Ang: linux client for RHES v3

2011-05-18 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Stor Manager" skrev: - Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Från: Richard Rhodes Sänt av: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Datum: 05/18/2011 21:18 Ärende: linux client for RHES v3 Hi everyone, We have just found that we have to start TSM backups of a RedHat Enterprise Linux ES Release

linux client for RHES v3

2011-05-18 Thread Richard Rhodes
Hi everyone, We have just found that we have to start TSM backups of a RedHat Enterprise Linux ES Release 3 server (that's what I'm told the version is).I went looking on IBM's web site - the oldest compatibility info I can come up with is for TSM client v5.4.1 as supporting RH v5. Does anyon

Re: Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64

2011-02-01 Thread Skylar Thompson
Thanks for reporting back. This is something we've struggled with too. I'll have to give nscd a shot. On 02/ 1/11 01:16 AM, Wolfgang J Moeller wrote: Last year, I had reported ... > on a (real big!) x86_64 machine, with freshly installed SuSE SLES 10.3, > scanning a mere ~500k files (and typ

Re: Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64

2011-02-01 Thread Wolfgang J Moeller
Last year, I had reported ... > on a (real big!) x86_64 machine, with freshly installed SuSE SLES 10.3, > scanning a mere ~500k files (and typically saving < 10,000 per run), > "dsmc" has been found to consume about 1.3 GByte of virtual memory > per single run. This is about tenfold from what you'

Re: TSM 6.2.0.0 Linux client crash

2010-10-15 Thread Richard Sims
APAR IC67814 deals with it. Richard Sims

Re: TSM 6.2.0.0 Linux client crash

2010-10-15 Thread Keith Arbogast
This issue also affects the 6.2.1.0 client. I received the note below from a client admin. His is a LinuxX86 node running TSM 6.2.1.0. Has this been fixed in a later client? Thank you, Keith -- dsmc segfaults on startup: [r...@i136 ~]# dsmc sched Segmentatio

Re: Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64

2010-07-20 Thread Wolfgang J Moeller
Grigori Solonovitch wrote: > I think there is a mistake in version. If you mention 6.2.1.0, try to install > 6.2.1.1. > There are some bugs related to memory allocation which are fixed in 6.2.1.1. > At least, client 6.2.1.1 helped to fix my problems with memory allocation. Sorry for the typo. 6.2

Re: Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64

2010-07-16 Thread Skylar Thompson
T.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64 Robert Clark writes: Dumb question, but have you examined the client to see if there are any circular links? (For example a link low in the tree that points higher in the tree.) To a

Re: Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64

2010-07-16 Thread Grigori Solonovitch
: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Wolfgang J Moeller [moel...@gwdg.de] Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 1:30 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64 Robert Clark writes: > Dumb question, but have

Re: Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64

2010-07-16 Thread Wolfgang J Moeller
Robert Clark writes: > Dumb question, but have you examined the client to see if there are any > circular links? > > (For example a link low in the tree that points higher in the tree.) To a first approximation, this doesn't seem to be the problem - I can see the "extensive" memory usage even wit

Re: Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64

2010-07-15 Thread Robert Clark
5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64 Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Skylar Thompson wrote: > I ran into something similar on RHEL4 when dealing with directories with > lots of files (11 million in one of them - so many that ext3 b-tree > indexing failed)

Re: Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64

2010-07-15 Thread Skylar Thompson
Yeah, for us dsmc would grow past 3GB over a couple days and then die because of the 32-bit virtual address space limit. Our solution was to educate users to avoid putting lots of files in one directory, and if there was a real need to notify us so we can exclude them in advance with exclude.dir.

Re: Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64

2010-07-15 Thread Wolfgang J Moeller
Skylar Thompson wrote: > I ran into something similar on RHEL4 when dealing with directories with > lots of files (11 million in one of them - so many that ext3 b-tree > indexing failed). I think even with MEMORYEFFICIENTBACKUP enabled, the > client will still need to allocate enough memory to han

Re: Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64

2010-07-12 Thread Skylar Thompson
I ran into something similar on RHEL4 when dealing with directories with lots of files (11 million in one of them - so many that ext3 b-tree indexing failed). I think even with MEMORYEFFICIENTBACKUP enabled, the client will still need to allocate enough memory to handle one directory at a time. Do

6.2.1.1 Linux client missing gsk rpms

2010-07-08 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Can someone with IBM can get this to the folks that packaged the latest client patches. I downloaded 6.2.1.1 for Linux, to get the fix for the /etc/issue problem. Sent it to my Linux client that discovered the problem, for verification. I was wondering why 6.2.1.1 was 15mb smaller than 6.2.1.0

Excessive memory consumption by 5.5 Linux client on SLES 10.3 x86_64

2010-07-07 Thread Wolfgang J Moeller
Good morning, on a (real big!) x86_64 machine, with freshly installed SuSE SLES 10.3, scanning a mere ~500k files (and typically saving < 10,000 per run), "dsmc" has been found to consume about 1.3 GByte of virtual memory per single run. This is about tenfold from what you'd expect ... And even w

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-23 Thread James Choate
ubject: Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error I suspect the error occurs when the backup-archive client attempts to stat the file system. Are you able to successfully "stat" this file system? stat /public/proval-old Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Ma

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-20 Thread Allen S. Rout
>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:39:11 -0400, Lindsay Morris >> said: > The TSM admin is like the canary in the coal mine. > (Wait, that's a terrible analogy .. they end up dead...) Terrible because it's inaccurate, or terrible because we don't like the implications? Your viewers want to know. :) -

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-20 Thread Lindsay Morris
Ben said TSM backups are great for sniffing out filesystem problems. ;-) I would add "and network problems, and application problems , and database performance problems ..." The TSM admin is like the canary in the coal mine. (Wait, that's a terrible analogy .. they end up dead...) --

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-20 Thread Andrew Raibeck
our friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2010-04-19 17:40:57: > [image removed] > > Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error > > James Choate > > to: > > ADSM-L > > 2010-04-19 21:09 > > Sent

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-20 Thread Richard Sims
On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:41 PM, James Choate wrote: > I am looking for the longest fully qualified file name on the system. > > An error=6 might be indicating ENAMETOOLONG (The only errno that equals 6 in > Linux). Errno 6 is ENXIO. FWIW, I've accumulated some notes on it over time... ENXIO

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-19 Thread James Choate
I just ran an fsck on /public/proval-old, No errors were found on that mount. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Ben Bullock Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 10:25 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Linux Client failing with

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-19 Thread James Choate
...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 10:31 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error On Apr 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, James Choate wrote: > 04/19/2010 08:56:26 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT BEGIN TEST_SCHEDULE > 04/19/2010 08

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-19 Thread Shawn Drew
T.EDU To ADSM-L cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error On Apr 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, James Choate wrote: > 04/19/2010 08:56:26 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT BEGIN TEST_SCHEDULE > 04/19/2010 08:40:00 04/19/2010 08:56:27 Incremental backup of volume > '/' &

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-19 Thread Richard Sims
On Apr 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, James Choate wrote: 04/19/2010 08:56:26 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT BEGIN TEST_SCHEDULE 04/19/2010 08:40:00 04/19/2010 08:56:27 Incremental backup of volume '/' 04/19/2010 08:56:27 Incremental backup of volume '/boot' 04/19/2010 08:56:27 Incremental backup of volume '/pu

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-19 Thread Ben Bullock
le. TSM backups are great for sniffing out filesystem problems. ;-) Ben -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of James Choate Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:46 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Linux Client failing with A

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-19 Thread James Choate
04/19/2010 08:38:26 04/19/2010 08:38:26 Schedule Name: TEST_SCHEDULE 04/19/2010 08:38:26 Action:Incremental 04/19/2010 08:38:26 Objects: 04/19/2010 08:38:26 Options: 04/19/2010 08:38:26 Server Window Start: 08:40

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-19 Thread Richard Sims
On Apr 19, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Richard Sims wrote: Jim - That evidence says that the warranted changes have not been made to the client to correct the initially reported problems, which continue. A thorough review of that client should be conducted, starting with 'dsmc query option' and 'dsmc qu

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-19 Thread Richard Sims
Jim - That evidence says that the warranted changes have not been made to the client to correct the initially reported problems, which continue. A thorough review of that client should be conducted, starting with 'dsmc query option' and 'dsmc query inclexcl', as the administration of that client

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-18 Thread James Choate
I have attached the dsmsched.log & dsmerror.log Dsmsched.log file 04/17/2010 18:08:35 TSM Backup-Archive Client Version 5, Release 5, Level 2.0 04/17/2010 18:08:35 Querying server for next scheduled event. 04/17/2010 18:08:35 Node Name: CLLINUX1 04/17/2010 18:08:35 Session established with server

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-18 Thread James Choate
iday, April 16, 2010 1:22 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error Jim - The backup log doesn't match timewise with the other logs, but I'll assume they are from multiple attempts of the same thing. It looks like the /public/proval-old object is ba

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-16 Thread Len Boyle
, 2010 2:51 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error Has anyone seen this error? I can't figure out whats going on and the messages guide isn't to helpful in resolving this error. Below are the client OS, BA client version, Server versio

Re: Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-16 Thread Richard Sims
Jim - The backup log doesn't match timewise with the other logs, but I'll assume they are from multiple attempts of the same thing. It looks like the /public/proval-old object is bad in some way, and needs examination. If that system hasn't had fsck's in a while, it may be time. I'd code an Exc

Linux Client failing with ANS1999E error

2010-04-16 Thread James Choate
Has anyone seen this error? I can't figure out whats going on and the messages guide isn't to helpful in resolving this error. Below are the client OS, BA client version, Server version, dsm.sys from the client, error in the dsmsched.log, dsmerror.log and a snippet from the srvr actlog file.

Re: TSM 6.2.0.0 Linux client crash

2010-03-30 Thread Andrew Raibeck
We have confirmed a defect in the TSM Linux client that can cause this crash, and will open an APAR. Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Hartford/i...@ibmus Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com

Re: TSM 6.2.0.0 Linux client crash

2010-03-26 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
s a very odd problem. Will let you know more when he responds. From: Michael Prix To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 03/25/2010 06:16 PM Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.2.0.0 Linux client crash Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hello, sorry, can't confirm. IBM Tivoli Storage Manager C

Re: TSM 6.2.0.0 Linux client crash

2010-03-25 Thread Michael Prix
ux lin02 2.6.27.42-0.1-default #1 SMP 2010-01-06 16:07:25 +0100 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- Michael Prix Am Thursday 25 March 2010 schrieben Sie: > At the moment, I'm just curious at the moment if anybody else has seen this > issue: > > TSM 6.2.0.0 Linux client will crash if /e

TSM 6.2.0.0 Linux client crash

2010-03-25 Thread c.hanover
At the moment, I'm just curious at the moment if anybody else has seen this issue: TSM 6.2.0.0 Linux client will crash if /etc/issue is larger than a 127 byte text file. 127 bytes or less of text, the client works fine. 128 bytes or more, and it segfaults. >127 bytes of random dat

Re: Netware to Linux client migration

2010-01-07 Thread Jürgen Weinelt
David Longo wrote: > > 2. With the new Linux servers, they will also implement Novell's > Dynamic Storage Technology. This will enable the infrequent accessed > files to be dumped off to a "shadow" space on SATA drives. > > Does anybody know if this speeds up the TSM backup? In other > words,

Netware to Linux client migration

2010-01-06 Thread David Longo
I have TSM server 5.5.2 and some older Netware clients. Netware 6.5 and most are TSM client 5.2.2.0. These are our Network file shares. The current volumes are NSS (TSM server filespace type "NTW:LONG".) The team is about to migrate all Netware over to Linux, SLES 10 and the TSM filespace type w

Re: Linux client memory woes

2010-01-05 Thread Schaub, Steve
Similar to the lack of an HSM for Windows version that runs on W2K3 x64... -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Howard Coles Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:23 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Linux client memory

Re: Linux client memory woes

2010-01-05 Thread Howard Coles
And there you go, a perfect "Business Justification" Not ours IBM, yours. Get off your butt and get this done. There is NO excuse for not having already created a 64 bit Linux client, especially since, from what I understand, the TSM Server only runs on 64 bit Linux. I find it

Re: Linux client memory woes

2010-01-05 Thread Richard Sims
IBM's failure to spontaneously provide a TSM Linux client for prevalent, modern CPU architectures is certainly a marked departure from the company's early pronouncements of Linux being a strategic direction meriting concerted product development. TSM client product management ha

Re: Linux client memory woes

2010-01-05 Thread Michael Green
Folks, turns out that whereas 64 bit clients for Linux PPC and Zseries are already available, it's not for x64 arch. Moreover, there are currently no plans for development the 64 bit version of BA client for Linux x64. Just to remind you that x64 client is required to overcome the 4GB memory limit

Re: Linux client memory woes

2010-01-04 Thread Michael Green
Just to follow up on this: I've received a confirmation from TSM level 2 support that BA Client for Linux i386/x64 is 32 bit application and thus fundamentally limited to 4GB RAM. I've also been given this link that discusses memory requi

  1   2   3   >