That is what happens at our site!
Start Offsite reclamation, do a couple q vols and you will see!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 2:24 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Offsite reclamation question? [ LONG
==> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:45:29 -0500, Sung Y Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I thought about this question. The answer is maybe in my opinion. how do
> you know P001 contains all the data what 0214, 0215, and 0216 need?
It doesn't: You know that, because the PRIMARY volume are divided by what
I thought about this question. The answer is maybe in my opinion.
how do you know P001 contains all the data what 0214, 0215, and 0216 need?
Unless there is a way to compare the data inside these tapes. When P001 is
mounted it will reclaim some data or maybe all tapes..
Another question I have is,
==> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:02:07 -0500, "David E Ehresman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Reclaim is built to require the fewest number possible of primary tapes. So
> when a reclaim threshold is set for a copy pool, TSM determines all eligible
> tapes, picks a primary pool tape to mount, takes al
Hi,
Overall...
Normally a site will have one or more primary storage pools. These may
be colocated to improve the efficiency of restores, depending on the
site and its resources. These primary storage pools are copied to one or
more copypools. The copypools are normally not colocated
==> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:55:28 -0500, Sung Y Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello,
> I have a follow up question.
> I see that you have 3 storage pools. Can you tell me what "COPY" storage is
> used for? is this one used like similar to Primary or are you making copy
> of Primary?
> Primar
Hello,
I have a follow up question.
I see that you have 3 storage pools. Can you tell me what "COPY" storage is
used for? is this one used like similar to Primary or are you making copy
of Primary?
Primary ---> Copy> Offsite (goes to offsite)
or
Primary --> copy (goes offsite)
--->
Hi, all: I've got a question I've been wondering about, relating to how
foresightful TSM is in its' offsite reclamation. I'll spin an example:
TSM server 'SRV1' has three nodes
NODE1
NODE2
NODE3
It's got stgpools
PRIMARY : collocated . Volumes named Pxxx
COPY: non-coll
