; wrote on 01/05/2018
10:45:19 AM:
> From: Zoltan Forray <zfor...@vcu.edu>
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 01/05/2018 10:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
anning is based on
> > > > several assumptions and I think it is really time for IBM to jump in
> > > > here. I think someone from development should explain a little bit
> > > > about the new security design and tell us how we should upgrade
> > > > witho
te on 01/04/2018
09:16:25 AM:
> From: Zoltan Forray <zfor...@vcu.edu>
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 01/04/2018 09:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
>
;
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 01/04/2018 09:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
>
> In fact a q server f=d shows Session Security: Transitional, but
> ea
,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan
Forray
Sent: donderdag 4 januari 2018 15:03
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only
klm.com>
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 01/04/2018 08:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
>
> Hi Del,
> Well, not really... I'm currently installing
rds,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del
> Hoobler
> Sent: donderdag 4 januari 2018 13:45
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Shoul
rom: "Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Date: 01/04/2018 03:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)
> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MAR
eone from development should explain a little bit
> > about the new security design and tell us how we should upgrade
> > without impact. Which components in which order to which recommended
> level.
> > Kind regards,
> > Eric van Loon
> > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
> >
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del
Hoobler
Sent: donderdag 4 januari 2018 13:45
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)
Here are a few links that might help:
https://www.ibm.com/support
t; <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 01/04/2018
03:37:53 AM:
> From: "Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 01/04/2018 03:40 AM
> Subject: Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)
> Sent by: "AD
sage-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Deschner, Roger Douglas
Sent: donderdag 4 januari 2018 0:14
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)
Test! Test! Test! Search this forum for previous posts about thi
Douglas
Sent: donderdag 4 januari 2018 0:14
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)
Test! Test! Test! Search this forum for previous posts about this. There are a
bunch of gotchas. Perhaps one of the most severe is what happens to
administrator
ct: Re: Should I upgrade to 7.1.8.x ??? (on the client end only)
Content preview: I believe the incompatibility arises if you set
SESSIONSECURITY
to STRICT for your nodes. The default is TRANSITIONAL so you should be fine;
IIRC the only communication problems we had when upgra
I too am looking to upgrade all of my servers from 7.1.7.300, soon. I went
through the documents in your link (IBM - one of them 404's). My first
concern would be upgrading the offsite replica server. While there is
documentation about library manager/client server levels/compatibility
(pretty
Content preview: I believe the incompatibility arises if you set
SESSIONSECURITY
to STRICT for your nodes. The default is TRANSITIONAL so you should be fine;
IIRC the only communication problems we had when upgrading our servers to
v7.1.8 was with library sharing. [...]
Content
Thanks for that link, I am more worried about any "gotcha's" caused by
upgrading the client to 7.1.8 or 8.1.2 before the storage servers get
upgraded (and start using the new authentication). What I had not
realized until I saw the chart is that the new clients are NOT backward
compatible with
There's pretty wide version compatibility between clients and servers; we
didn't go v7 server-side until pretty recently but have been running the v7
client for a while. IBM has a matrix published here:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21053218
For basic backups and restores I
18 matches
Mail list logo
