Wednesday, July 16, 2003 20:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue
Hi, Eric. Actually, no. An offsite volume will be in Pending, then when
reuse delay is up, the volume goes to status=Empty and drm
status=vaultretrieve. A volume can also be status=empty from the
-
> From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:58
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:48:58 +0200
> "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> &
olume.
Alex Paschal
Freightliner, LLC
(503) 745-6850 phone/vmail
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue
Hi Remco!
You are right, but aren't empty volu
Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
Hoi Eric,
nope, that is when pending volumes become empty :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
Hoi Eric,
nope, that is when pending volumes become empty :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: collocated stor
16, 2003 16:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200
Jacques Butcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape
> volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran.
&g
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200
Jacques Butcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape
> volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran.
> By querying the library volumes it does not say that these
> tapes contains "data" but they are
Butcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: woensdag 16 juli 2003 14:50
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: Re: collocated storage pool issue
>
>
> I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape
> volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran.
>
I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape
volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran.
By querying the library volumes it does not say that these
tapes contains "data" but they are still private. Querying
the volumes shows that the tapes are empty. They are
however
Increase the value of Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed in new storage pool.
You can reorganize client data into new collacted storage pool by moving
node data.
Regards,
Zosi Noriega
-Original Message-
From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 P
10 matches
Mail list logo