I have a Linux box running oracle and using rman/TSM for Oracle for backup and
restores.
TDPO is 5.5.1.0. The TSM client API is 6.3.0.0. The TSM Server, running on
AIX, is 6.2.4.0.
Backups times are acceptable, approximated 250GB in an hour using two rman
channels. This drives the TSM
on physical tape.
Regards,
Shawn
Shawn Drew
Internet
deehr...@louisville.edu
Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
10/19/2012 03:35 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L
cc
Subject
[ADSM-L] Bad rman/TSM for Oracle restore performance
I
Its virtual tape
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Shawn
Drew
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 4:03 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Bad rman/TSM for Oracle restore performance
is this VTL or physical tape?
Just
This is more an RMAN question that a TSM for DB one but . . .
Can oneone tell me in general terms how RMAN does a hot backup? Does
it buffer updates to the db and apply them after the backup is done? Or
reject updates during the backup? Or . . .? Assuming db updates are
allowed during the
On Thursday 08 December 2005 21:18, David E Ehresman wrote:
This is more an RMAN question that a TSM for DB one but . . .
Can oneone tell me in general terms how RMAN does a hot backup? Does
it buffer updates to the db and apply them after the backup is done? Or
reject updates during the
Hello All,
Database: Oracle7 ( Soon to be *)
TSM Server: AIX 4.3.3 ML9
TSM: v3.7.2
Our Oracle database backups to TSM are currently managed by
SQL-Backtrack. The databases are Oracle7 but will be migrated to Oracle8 in
the near future. We are interested in using RMAN to manage the
One thing to note about TDPO_AVG_SIZE when using TDP for Oracle 2.2, and
more importantly when using TDP for Oracle 2.2 with Oracle 8i or greater
is that we no longer require the use of TDPO_AVG_SIZE. It used to be that
Oracle (versions prior to 8i) did not send the size of the backup to TDP
for
Yes, that's what we are seeing at one of my customer's sites. Requires
some kludging to get everything to work.
-Lloyd
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 21:32:33 -0500
Seay, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Typically, you define a maximum size for the storage pool. The problem
here
is that the TDP is
, March 30, 2002 7:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Rman/TSm
Yes, that's what we are seeing at one of my customer's sites. Requires
some kludging to get everything to work.
-Lloyd
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 21:32:33 -0500
Seay, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Typically, you define a maximum size
: Rman/TSm
Question: When an object is passed via TDP to TSM for backup, does the
defined storage pool in TSM have to have enough space to backup the entire
object? If the storage pool has 20GB defined, but the object is 45GB, won't
the backup spill over to the storage pool specified in the next
pool?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Malbrough, Demetrius
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Rman/TSm
Mark,
This is from the TDP for Oracle manual!
RMAN generates unique backup file names
PROTECTED]
.ATT.NETcc:
Sent by: ADSM: Subject: Re: Rman/TSm
Dist Stor
Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU
03/29/2002 07:47
. This is
just a stab at what may happen. I have never seen it before.
-Original Message-
From: Ike Hunley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 7:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Rman/TSm
Question: When an object is passed via TDP to TSM for backup, does the
defined
objects to be deleted.
Regards,
Demetrius Malbrough
UNIX/TSM Administrator
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hayden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Rman/TSm
Hi all, we have a problem in regard to expiring data after Rman has
Do you run a a daily EXPIRE INVENTORY on the TSM server?
Which version of TDP for Oracle do you have?
David Longo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/28/02 03:55PM
Hi all, we have a problem in regard to expiring data after Rman has deleted the data.
We have taken the retention values down to 1 version with
Hi all, we have a problem in regard to expiring data after Rman has deleted the data.
We have taken the retention values down to 1 version with the RETONLY and VERDELETED
to 0. When we do a select statement, they do show inactive, but are not
expiring.Do I have a TSM DB problem, or is
16 matches
Mail list logo
