data, tape growth, whether a copy pool will be used, how many DB backups
are sufficient...
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ramiro Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I have a IBM TS3200 library with 42 available tapes(SCRATCH) I setup
> the maximum scratch mount to 20, should
Scratch mount does not have to equal the # of the tapes in the library.
It's main purpose is to control the # of tapes a storage pool can
consume.
- Chris
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ramiro Ruiz
Sent: Monday, November 24,
Hello, I have a IBM TS3200 library with 42 available tapes(SCRATCH) I setup the
maximum scratch mount to 20, should I set it up to be 42? sorry for the
question. I am new at TSM
Thank you :)
__
Ramiro Ruiz, Network Specialist
Information Services
Schulich
list, or am I behind the times
and it's already been done?
Thanks,
Mark Bertrand
-Original Message-
From: Quiros, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Scratch mount failed
Just use the upd libv command to change t
PROTECTED]
Subject: Scratch mount failed
Over the last weekend we had a tape get stuck in a drive and threw the drive
offline, no big deal, right? This happens enough that we know how to deal
with it, but... this is the first time that this has happened (in my limited
three years experience) in
Over the last weekend we had a tape get stuck in a drive and threw the drive
offline, no big deal, right? This happens enough that we know how to deal
with it, but... this is the first time that this has happened (in my limited
three years experience) in that the stuck tape was a scratch tape. This
