tag, 10. Januar 2002 19:28
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: Subfile Backup Experience
>
>
> That sounds good. I have read the docs about Subfilebackup
> and have 2 more
> questions.
>
> what about the TESTFLAG Takeownership for dsm.opt is
> it still in
&g
application than you'd think" -
Scott Adams/Dilbert
With regards,
Stefan Holzwarth
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2002 19:50
> An: [EMAIL
; An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: Subfile Backup Experience
>
>
> One of our TSM servers backs up approx. 350 Wintel desktops
> nightly, plus
> about 30 Windows & UNIX servers.
>
> Our users keep their .pst files on their desktops, rather than on the
>
ECTED]
Subject: Subfile Backup Experience
Currently i have problems to backup a fileserver with many large pst
files
(Outlook)
The incremental has to save nearly 25% of the whole data every night
over a
2 MBit line.
I wonder if it is a good idea to use subfilebackup feature only for pst
Files
ge-
From: Stefan Holzwarth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Subfile Backup Experience
Currently i have problems to backup a fileserver with many large pst files
(Outlook)
The incremental has to save nearly 25% of the whole
Currently i have problems to backup a fileserver with many large pst files
(Outlook)
The incremental has to save nearly 25% of the whole data every night over a
2 MBit line.
I wonder if it is a good idea to use subfilebackup feature only for pst
Files with
exclude.subfile "*"
include.subfile "?:
