Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-28 Thread William ZHANG
Thanks All. Policy problem has been resolved currently. -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:r...@bu.edu] Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 9:11 PM To: William ZHANG Subject: Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem On Dec 23, 2009, at 10:16 PM, William ZHANG wrote

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-27 Thread William ZHANG
ADSM-L] TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem On Dec 25, 2009, at 3:08 AM, William ZHANG wrote: > Again, > I want to add a archive copy group for archiving files to retain 3 years. > > So, see manual, but donot fully understand. > If I should input: > > > Tsm:> define copygroup DOM_S

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-25 Thread Richard Sims
On Dec 25, 2009, at 3:08 AM, William ZHANG wrote: > Again, > I want to add a archive copy group for archiving files to retain 3 years. > > So, see manual, but donot fully understand. > If I should input: > > > Tsm:> define copygroup DOM_SRV SET_SRV MC_90DAYS type=archive > Dest=LTO3_ARCH_

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-25 Thread William ZHANG
d Sims [mailto:r...@bu.edu] Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 9:11 PM To: William ZHANG Subject: Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem On Dec 23, 2009, at 10:16 PM, William ZHANG wrote: > > --- > Another question how can I modidy archiving time to 3 years? See Archive Co

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-23 Thread Grigori Solonovitch
sider the environment before printing this Email -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of William ZHANG Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 6:16 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem Hi All, I hav

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-23 Thread William ZHANG
est Regards, william -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of David E Ehresman Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 12:24 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem If you REALLY want to keep data in TSM for 60 days, you ne

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-21 Thread William ZHANG
5.3.4 Policy problem On Dec 20, 2009, at 8:46 PM, William ZHANG wrote: > Hi All, > Thanks for your help. > > Do anyone know if I change the setting of TSM , how can I restore my setting > back to before change? You would change your settings back in the same way that you altered them

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-21 Thread Richard Sims
On Dec 20, 2009, at 8:46 PM, William ZHANG wrote: > Hi All, > Thanks for your help. > > Do anyone know if I change the setting of TSM , how can I restore my setting > back to before change? You would change your settings back in the same way that you altered them. Be aware when you reduce retent

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-20 Thread William ZHANG
18, 2009 4:27 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem On 18 dec 2009, at 07:18, William ZHANG wrote: > Hi All, > > Thanks for your help! > > When I input: > ACTIVATE POLICYSET DOM_SRC SET_SRV > > TSM give a message: > ANR1557W The

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-18 Thread Remco Post
On 18 dec 2009, at 07:18, William ZHANG wrote: > Hi All, > > Thanks for your help! > > When I input: > ACTIVATE POLICYSET DOM_SRC SET_SRV > > TSM give a message: > ANR1557W The space management migration destination in management class > MC_90DAYS does > Not refer to a defined storage pool: SPA

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-17 Thread William ZHANG
Regards, william -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Carol Trible Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 11:25 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem Activate makes the activated policy set the active one by copying

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-17 Thread Bos, Karel
o:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of David E Ehresman Sent: donderdag 17 december 2009 17:24 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem If you REALLY want to keep data in TSM for 60 days, you need Update copygroup DOM_SRV ACTIVE MC_90DAYS type=backup verexists=nolimit verdeleted=no

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-17 Thread David E Ehresman
SM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem I would take a look at the RETExtra/Only parm of the copy group, they manage the data by date instead of versions. Managing retention time using the versions parameters can give some unintended results (an extra backup of a changed fi

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-17 Thread Carol Trible
30 60 > STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD 2 > 1 30 60 > > > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of > Skylar Thompson > Sent: Thursday, December

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-17 Thread Tchuise, Bertaut
- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of William ZHANG Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:24 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem Hello Skylar, Do you mean, > update copygroup DOM_SRV SET_SRV MC_90DAYS STANDARD verexists

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-16 Thread Skylar Thompson
60 > > > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of > Skylar Thompson > Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:44 PM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-16 Thread William ZHANG
.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Skylar Thompson Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:44 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem You actually want to modify the copy group from your inactive policy set. In most cases this should be STANDARD rather than ACTIVE. You the

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-16 Thread Skylar Thompson
and copygroup > so that I can get what I want? > > > Many thanks! > > William > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of > Bos, Karel > Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 6:27 PM > To: ADSM-L@VM

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-16 Thread William ZHANG
instance). Kind regards, Karel -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Grigori Solonovitch Sent: woensdag 16 december 2009 10:31 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem Yes, but it is better to use 60 instead of

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-16 Thread Bos, Karel
). Kind regards, Karel -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Grigori Solonovitch Sent: woensdag 16 december 2009 10:31 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem Yes, but it is better to use 60 instead of 59

Re: TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-16 Thread Grigori Solonovitch
printing this Email -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of William ZHANG Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:28 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem Hello All, I meet a problem, If I want to

TSM 5.3.4 Policy problem

2009-12-16 Thread William ZHANG
Hello All, I meet a problem, If I want to retain deleted data 60days in TSM, what commands should I input to modified policy in TSM? should the "versions data exists" and "versions data deleted" be modified from 2 to 59 , right? These are my configuration: --