>> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:12:52 -0400, "Strand, Neil B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
> If ($pvu < 900) {
Dang. Syntax error.
- Allen S. Rout
hip)
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:36 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
>
> During our audit, I was commissioned to perform an exhaustively
> thorough
> search of the current backup vendors out there, and I included VTL and
> de-d
Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:13 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
A VTL vendor said he is seeing a number of mid-sized businesses
migrating from TSM to NBU (Symantec). Do you think this is true? My
concern is that the pool of support techs will shrink and put us
> Fourth question : In my opinion VTLs provide not too much possibilities,
> in general VTLs aren't matures but it is ideal for lanfree backup.
Speeking of lan free, if a VTL can emulate a tape drive, why can't TSM do
this? If TSM can simulate a tape drive to the client, the client can do LAN
M's involvement.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francisco
Molero
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 6:33 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
Hello colleagues,
TSM being abandoned ?
I don't know b
Hello colleagues,
TSM being abandoned ?
I don't know but IBM 6.1 will have much more functionality than previous
versions. IBM has bought two companies FilesX and Diligent . FilesX will be add
to TSM in Windows environments, and Diligent improves the dedup technologies.
First que
Timothy,
There was a discussion session about this at the Oxford TSM Symposium last
fall, facilitated by some folks in TSM Development. I cannot say what will
be in the next version of TSM, but I can say that IBM appears to be well
aware of this issue, and they have taken steps to listen to user
you can, begin it.
Boldness has genius, power and magic.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Timothy Hughes
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 1:49 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
Remco Post wrote:
>
begin it.
Boldness has genius, power and magic.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Timothy Hughes
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 1:49 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
Remco Post wrote:
> Timothy H
0:49 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
Remco Post wrote:
> Timothy Hughes wrote:
>
>> Well, on that note I have a "possible stupid question" does anyone
>> think it's will be possible for a customer to have a choice of
>>
Remco Post wrote:
Timothy Hughes wrote:
Well, on that note I have a "possible stupid question" does anyone
think it's will be possible for a customer to have a choice of
staying with
the current TSM database if they liked they way it is and still upgrade
to TSM V6? Sorry I was just curious
Timothy Hughes wrote:
Well, on that note I have a "possible stupid question" does anyone
think it's will be possible for a customer to have a choice of staying with
the current TSM database if they liked they way it is and still upgrade
to TSM V6? Sorry I was just curious
No, but you will ha
1187 (mobile)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/16/2008 2:46 PM >>>
It is slotted to be released Jan 2009.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Timothy Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 2:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Su
EDU
Subject: Re: TSM being abandoned?
An IBM TSM person told me that TSM v6 will have db2 for its database and
they are shootng for an announcement in October. Yeehaw!!
Regards,
Nicholas Rodolfich
Network Administrator (AIX)
East Jefferson General Hospital
504-883-6955 (office)
228-223-1187
Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Zarnowski
Sent: 18 April 2008 15:25
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Fw: TSM being abandoned?
A few more points:
- It's true that hardware compression is faster than software compression,
and off-loads the server. Har
A few more points:
- It's true that hardware compression is faster than software compression,
and off-loads the server. Hardware compression often is an extra-cost
item. This can also be true of encryption, if done in hardware. The
question is, where do you want to do your encryption? At the
Nicholas Cassimatis wrote:
> As an appliance, I call that Hardware, as in it's a device outside of the
> host getting the service, performing the service.
You can call an apple a pear, but that will not make it so.
Now, more to the point, of course an appliance doing exactly one task
(dedup incom
d by Nicholas Cassimatis/Raleigh/IBM on 04/17/2008 04:02 PM
-
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 04/17/2008
02:29:00 PM:
> [image removed]
>
> Re: Fw: TSM being abandoned?
>
> Curtis Preston
>
> to:
>
> ADSM-L
>
> 04/17/2008 02:34 PM
>
>
ay, April 17, 2008 10:58 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Fw: TSM being abandoned?
>
> Compression and encryption are also much faster in hardware than
software
> -
> especially when the software is running on a processor doing other
work.
> Nothing new under t
leigh/IBM on 04/17/2008 01:51 PM
-
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 04/17/2008
12:13:08 PM:
> Re: TSM being abandoned?
>
> Curtis Preston
>
> to:
>
> ADSM-L
>
> 04/17/2008 12:18 PM
>
> Sent by:
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
nrik Vahlstedt
Sendt: to 17.04.2008 15:07
Til: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Emne: What to dedup.. was "TSM being abandoned?"
Hi,
Isnt dedup most beneficial at deduplicating databses ex. Oracle and
Domino etc...? No pre-compression or encryption.
Even Data Domain dedup thoose types av data pre
There is a presentation out on the web from the Oxford 2007 Symposium about
TSM dedup. From reading it, I'm sure just how useful it will be. It only
supports FILE devices (files are re-duplicated when written to tape) and
duplicate blocks are not removed until reclamation (you don't get the
benef
nal Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Henrik Vahlstedt
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 6:07 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] What to dedup.. was "TSM being abandoned?"
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
, William F.
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 10:15 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
>
> I have been configuring a new TSM server since last November. At
first
> I wanted a VTL. But when I learned from the Oxford symposium
> presentat
> Deduplicating VTLs fit better into NBU sites. TSM's progressive
> incremental methodology already reduces the data stream, making
deduping
> VTLs less of a "win", though it can still be beneficial.
As I've said before, TSM's progressive incremental does tend to reduce
the total dedupe ratio b
House Technologies
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Howard Coles
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 7:19 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
>
> I'd say businesses are mi
Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hans Christian Riksheim
Sent: den 17 april 2008 14:32
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
We look at dedup VTL as a possible target for active storage pools
containing ordinary file backup. This way we don't risk
dedup
VTLs and the performance is questionable.
Best regards
Hans Chr.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orin Rehorst
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 4:13 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: TSM being abandoned?
A VTL vendor sa
ank you,
Bill Evans
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nicholas Rodolfich
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 3:03 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
An IBM TSM person told me that TSM v6 will have db2 for i
t; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/16/2008 2:46 PM >>>
It is slotted to be released Jan 2009.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Timothy Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 2:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM be
It is slotted to be released Jan 2009.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Timothy Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 2:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
Is Version 6 going to be released this
DSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM being abandoned?
Is Version 6 going to be released this Year or Next?
regards
Colwell, William F. wrote:
>I have been configuring a new TSM server since last November. At first
>I wanted a VTL. But when I learned from the Oxford symposium
>presentat
ard.
Bill Colwell
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Zarnowski
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 12:08 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM being abandoned?
Deduplicating VTLs fit better into NBU sites. TSM's progress
looking
into and maybe testing with a TSM system.
See Ya'
Howard
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Colwell, William F.
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 12:15 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [A
in it.
Boldness has genius, power and magic.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Colwell, William F.
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 1:15 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
I have been configuring a new TSM s
TECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Zarnowski
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 12:08 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM being abandoned?
Deduplicating VTLs fit better into NBU sites. TSM's progressive
incremental methodology already reduces the data stream, making deduping
VTLs less of a "
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Coles
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 7:49 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject
Deduplicating VTLs fit better into NBU sites. TSM's progressive
incremental methodology already reduces the data stream, making deduping
VTLs less of a "win", though it can still be beneficial. My point is that
VTL vendors may not look as positively on TSM as they do on other
less-efficient backu
T.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
Maybe it has something to do with IBM's recent audit of TSM licensee's.
I know our management is seriously thinking of abandoning TSM due to
cost.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On B
Ya'
Howard
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Remeta, Mark
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:43 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
>
> Maybe it has somethi
2008 10:19 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM being abandoned?
I'd say businesses are migrating in all kinds of directions. I'd think
that you'd see some migrating from other products to TSM as well,
however, it would be interesting to see current numbers.
See Ya'
H
r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Orin Rehorst
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:13 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM being abandoned?
>
> A VTL vendor said he is seeing a number of mid-sized businesses
> migrating from TSM to NBU (Symantec). Do y
A VTL vendor said he is seeing a number of mid-sized businesses
migrating from TSM to NBU (Symantec). Do you think this is true? My
concern is that the pool of support techs will shrink and put us in a
bind.
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston
43 matches
Mail list logo
