Re: WIN2K client only using 1 CPU for scanning.

2003-09-18 Thread Andrew Raibeck
t Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/18/2003 11:18 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: WIN2K client only using 1 CPU for scanning. Mark, the TSM client by design is multi-threaded since m

Re: WIN2K client only using 1 CPU for scanning.

2003-09-18 Thread Zlatko Krastev
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 17.09.2003 18:28 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: WIN2K client only using 1 CPU for scanning.

Re: WIN2K client only using 1 CPU for scanning.

2003-09-17 Thread Richard Sims
>That's not exactly what he asked about, Richard. He's referring to the >TSM client application being able to open multiple CPU threads, not >multiple TSM sessions. Mark - I understand that the question was about CPU multi-threading, and multi-threading is the basis of the Multi-Session Cli

Re: WIN2K client only using 1 CPU for scanning.

2003-09-17 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>I was under the impression that the TSM clients were multithreaded. >>But I can not find any documentation that specifically identifies >>multithreading as part of the client. Only that it will run on either >>single cpu or multi CPU systems. >Mul

Re: WIN2K client only using 1 CPU for scanning.

2003-09-16 Thread Richard Sims
... > I was under the impression that the TSM clients were multithreaded. But I >can not find any documentation that specifically identifies multithreading >as part of the client. Only that it will run on either single cpu or multi >CPU systems. Multi-session client (backup) was introduced in 3.7

WIN2K client only using 1 CPU for scanning.

2003-09-16 Thread Ochs, Duane
Good day everyone, We have noticed a couple multiprocessor Windows clients having only 1 CPU pegged to almost 100% while scanning during backups. The culprit process is dsmcsvc.exe. The systems have a very large number of files but are not transferring any significant data. We have upgraded one of