From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Laura Buckley
I know that it's bad form for me to tout my own product, but STORServer
Manager (the TSM operational interface) may help you to solve this
problem. It is a GUI to your tapes at the vault, in the library, in
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Matt Simpson
Tape volumes in the storage pool will now go to PENDING status
when they are
moved to ONSITERETRIEVE status. You won't be able to check them in as
scratch tapes until the reusedelay period of time expires.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:17:16AM -0400, Matt Simpson wrote:
scratch. All is OK if human retrieves all the right tapes. But if
one doesn't get retrieved for some reason, there is no longer any
record that the tape exists and isn't where it belongs. I'd like to
What I do, is create an
At 11:48 PM -0500 10/25/02, Mark Stapleton wrote:
That's exactly what will happen. If you set the reusedelay for 1 day, it
will mean that it will be 24 hours before those tapes can be checked in a
scratch tapes--loads of time to make sure that the right tapes are
retrieved.
But that's exactly
At 6:57 AM +0200 10/25/02, Burak Demircan wrote:
Do you have some small scripts for operator to take tapes in and out easily?
Please sen me directly if you have them.
I would also be interested in seeing any such scripts, and I'll bet a
bunch of other people would, too. Anybody who has scripts
guess u need this on too
-Original Message-
From: Matt Simpson [mailto:msimpson;UKY.EDU]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator scripts
At 6:57 AM +0200 10/25/02, Burak Demircan wrote:
Do you have some small scripts for operator
what about this?
TEST FIRST ON NON-PRODUCTION MACHINE!
pls do change tehe email adres options etc
mi©helle
-Original Message-
From: Matt Simpson [mailto:msimpson;UKY.EDU]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator scripts
At 6:57 AM +0200
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Matt Simpson
Before I can check a tape back in, (I think) I have to change its
status to ONSITERETRIEVE. This effectively deletes the tape from the
database. It looks like it would be easy for things to fall through
the
At 9:37 AM -0500 10/25/02, Mark Stapleton wrote:
UPDATE STG stgpool_name REUSEDELAY=number_of_days
Tape volumes in the storage pool will now go to PENDING status when they are
moved to ONSITERETRIEVE status. You won't be able to check them in as
scratch tapes until the reusedelay period
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator scripts
At 9:37 AM -0500 10/25/02, Mark Stapleton wrote:
UPDATE STG stgpool_name REUSEDELAY=number_of_days
Tape volumes in the storage pool will now go to PENDING status when
they are moved
received them. It only takes a
minute (literally).
-Original Message-
From: Matt Simpson [mailto:msimpson;UKY.EDU]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator scripts
At 9:37 AM -0500 10/25/02, Mark Stapleton wrote:
UPDATE STG stgpool_name
At 9:33 AM -0600 10/25/02, Laura Buckley wrote:
After producing the list of VAULTRETRIEVE tapes, move them to
COURIERRETRIEVE instead of ONSITERETRIEVE. When the courier returns
with the tapes, move them to ONSITERETREIVE.
That's not really solving my dilemma. I'm trying to avoid a lot of
At 11:32 AM -0400 10/25/02, Nelson, Doug wrote:
We move tapes from VaultRetrieve to CourierRetrieve and then move
them (individually) from CourierRetrieve to OnSiteRetrieve once we
have verified that we have received them. It only takes a minute
(literally).
I don't like the process of
;VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Matt Simpson
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator scripts
At 11:32 AM -0400 10/25/02, Nelson, Doug wrote:
We move tapes from VaultRetrieve to CourierRetrieve and then move them
(individually) from CourierRetrieve to OnSiteRetrieve
ofc
425-988-8478 fax
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Matt Simpson
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator scripts
At 11:32 AM -0400 10/25/02, Nelson, Doug wrote:
We move tapes
less practical application than you'd think -
Scott Adams/Dilbert
-Original Message-
From: Matt Simpson [mailto:msimpson;UKY.EDU]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator
At 2:04 PM -0400 10/25/02, Prather, Wanda wrote:
I guess the other thing you could do, would be to take the list of tapes in
VAULTRETRIEVE status, generate commands to check them in as PRIVATE , THEN
compare the list of LIBVOLS against the list still in VAULTRETRIEVE to make
sure they all got
: Prather, Wanda [mailto:Wanda.Prather;JHUAPL.EDU]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 2:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator scripts
I have worked on this problem a LOT, and as far as I know there is nothing
in TSM, DRM, or Autovault that deals with the situation you describe,
We also
Jim,
Can you please send me the script for the report? My guys would love to
have it.
Thanks.
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Jim Taylor [mailto:jtaylor;ENLOGIX.COM]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator scripts
I think order
checkin complete.
But again, I haven't tried it.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Simpson [mailto:msimpson;UKY.EDU]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: drm operator scripts
At 2:04 PM -0400 10/25/02, Prather, Wanda wrote:
I guess the other thing you
Hi,
Do you have some small scripts for operator to take tapes in and out easily?
Please sen me directly if you have them.
Regards,
Burak
21 matches
Mail list logo
