I've had some sys admins ask me about a possible situation with
using dedup on our primary storage pool. We are currently using dedup and I
can't come up with a good answer.
Ok, our primary storage pool is using dedup. Something
(corruption, whatever) happens to o
Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tyree,
David
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:36 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] hypothetical situation with dedup turned on
I've had some sys admins ask me about a possible situation with
using dedup on our pr
Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tyree,
David
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:36 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] hypothetical situation with dedup turned on
I've had some sys admins ask me about a possible situation with
using dedup o
ilto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:58 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] hypothetical situation with dedup turned on
Have you tried to use standard copy pol to recover any problems in primary pool?
Grigori G
lto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Alex
Paschal
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 1:09 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] hypothetical situation with dedup turned on
Hi, David. You can still do as you're already doing: "audit volume fix=yes"
to find the damage
ARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] hypothetical situation with dedup turned on
Hi, David. You can still do as you're already doing: "audit volume fix=yes"
to find the damaged blocks, then do a "move data" against the good data. That
would leave the unreadable data on the volume
the way, the term "full incremental" makes me twitch, even without
> the vodka!)
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Alex
> Paschal
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 1:09 AM
> To:
