Hello All,
I have been tasked with finding out how much inactive data we have for
old user accounts and am having trouble coming up with a good query. I
have been trying to use the dsmc q backup -subdir=yes -inactive
command. The problem is with the syntax for the directory. The areas I
@vm.marist.edu
Date: 2010-05-21 11:21
Subject: dsmc q backup syntax
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Hello All,
I have been tasked with finding out how much inactive data we have for
old user accounts and am having trouble coming up with a good query. I
have been trying
is showing objects, not files. This
includes directory objects.
At 02:10 AM 2/23/2006, Volker Maibaum wrote:
The strange thing is, that q occ shows me that there should be 441.000
files in the primary stgpool and q backup (-inact -subdir=yes) shows
only 190.000 files.
--
Paul Zarnowski
Keep in mind that Q OCC is showing objects, not files. This
includes directory objects.
At 02:10 AM 2/23/2006, Volker Maibaum wrote:
The strange thing is, that q occ shows me that there should be 441.000
files in the primary stgpool and q backup (-inact -subdir=yes) shows
only 190.000 files
Yes, but q backup -inact -subdir=yes /filespace/ includes directories
and files both active and inactive. And the number of files and
directories I get from this command isn't even the half of what q occ
shows for the primary stgpool.
Am Donnerstag, den 23.02.2006, 09:31 -0500 schrieb Paul
Volker -
Given that this data came in all at once in an Import (from an
unusual server type, VM), it is probably concentrated on a few
volumes. To settle the issue, I would perform a Query CONtent on the
volume(s), to a disk file, and browse that listing to see what's
actually out there. (Query
You could also run a select:
dsmadmc -tab -id=xxx -pass=xxx select * from backups where
nodename='NODENAME' sel.bkp
This will take a while to run, but shouldn't be too bad.
At 10:17 AM 2/23/2006, Richard Sims wrote:
Volker -
Given that this data came in all at once in an Import (from an
a filelist on the client with
q backup -inact -subdir=yes /filespace1/ mylist
wc -l mylist tells me that there are only about 189.553 files. Also
when I calculate the sum of the filesizes shown in the filelist I only
get about 117 GB. I don't have this discrepancy on other nodes.
There is also
Query OCCupancy reports primary and copy storage pool populations.
The client is obviously unaware of copy storage pools, which are
exclusively the server's interest.
The output of the Query OCCupancy *should* include one line for each
storage pool instance. Something may be awry if that is not
Hi,
yes there are two lines for that specific filespace. One for primary and
one for the copy stg pool.
The strange thing is, that q occ shows me that there should be 441.000
files in the primary stgpool and q backup (-inact -subdir=yes) shows
only 190.000 files.
Am Mittwoch, den
We have two clients on NT boxes with oracle databses. (One TSM install).
One is the flat file backup, the 2nd with its own dsm.opt file is for
SQl-BACKTRACK.
We cannot query the backups on SQL-BACTRACK since the dsmc invokes with
the flat file client dsm.opt ( and hence can't do a set access for
Have you tried 'dsmc -virtualnode= . . .'?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/20/05 11:02 AM
We have two clients on NT boxes with oracle databses. (One TSM install).
One is the flat file backup, the 2nd with its own dsm.opt file is for
SQl-BACKTRACK.
We cannot query the backups on SQL-BACTRACK since the dsmc
Hello,
i tested a client backupresults by q backup command:
the result ist, the files are saved with the default managementclass, thats
all right.
But the directories all show a diffrent managmentclass, which this client
should never heard off. It is not in the dsm.opt/dsm.sys file
-
From: Michael Kindermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: q backup shows wrong mgmtclass, BUG ?
Hello,
i tested a client backupresults by q backup command:
the result ist, the files are saved with the default managementclass
11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: q backup shows wrong mgmtclass, BUG ?
Hello,
i tested a client backupresults by q backup command:
the result ist, the files are saved with the default managementclass, thats
all right.
But the directories all show a diffrent managmentclass, which
you some more specifics.
Regards,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Michael Kindermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: q backup shows wrong mgmtclass, BUG ?
Hello,
i tested a client backupresults by q backup command
:
Subject:Re: q backup shows wrong mgmtclass, BUG ?
If you do not explicitly specify a management class for directories they
will go to the longest defined management class.
Take care,
Al
Alan Davenport
Senior Storage Administrator
Selective Insurance Co. of America
I am trying to perform a restore from a remote node without success.
I am running the command res -fromnode=server1 t:\ e:\(restore location)
-subdir=yes -repl=no
I keep getting the msg no files backed up for t:\. Yet when I issue q backup t:\
on server1 I get a list of files backed up but only
r t:\. Yet when I issue q backup t:\
on server1 I get a list of files backed up but only the ones backed up using the
GUI. I don't see a list of files backed up when I used WINAT to schedule the
job.
Does anyone have any insight into how this can be resolved.
Many Thanks
Forgot to say, I am workin
use virtualnodename ..
shekhar
Toni Banire [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 01/15/2001 03:49:31 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: q
AIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: q backup
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:00:29 -0500
use virtualnodename ..
shekhar
Toni Banire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU on 01/15/2001 03:49:31 AM
Please
21 matches
Mail list logo
