Of course, changing the policies effect everyone using that MgtClass, but we
> can live with that . . . . I think.
>
>
> Ok, is that right?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rick
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rhodes, Richard L.
> Sent: Wednes
o/api/file'
Bye
M. Janosik
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2017-09-20
14:18:41:
> From: "Rhodes, Richard L."
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 2017-09-20 14:20
> Subject: [ADSM-L] rebinding objects for API client archives
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist
Ok, is that right?
Thanks!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Rhodes, Richard L.
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 8:19 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Cc: Ake, Elizabeth K.
Subject: rebinding objects for API client archives
We have a TSM instance that is dedicated to "applications&q
We have a TSM instance that is dedicated to "applications". These are
applications that use the API client to store some kind of object in TSM. An
example is IBM Content Manager. Nodes are in domains with a default Mgt Class
with 7 years retention, and store their data as Archives, although o
