On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 20:18:59 +0200, Dejan Jelovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Patrick Steele wrote:
>
>> > What I can't understand why reference couting wasn't
>> > implemented in CLI as a standard facility. A [Counted]
>> > attribute would do the trick nicely.
>> > ...
>>
>> See:
>>
>>
>http://di
Hi,
I'm basically trying to remove my assemblies dependency on the 2 COM
Interop dll's that are generated when using the WebBrowser control.
There's a nice example at
http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/webbrowserrevisited.asp that got be
started, but unfortunately it doesn't go far enough. Basic
Can you give me some platform info? What web server and client platform
are you using? When you say it doesn't work, what happens? Does IEExec
start up and hang? Does it crash? IEExec is the app that is hosting your
winforms app btw.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Adair [mailto:dpadair@;YAH
Hey Jeff,
In V1.0 of the .Net framework, Microsoft did not take
account for the hard margins of the printer. This
means that if the hard margin for the printer was
inset by 1/4 of an inch then a margin of 1 inch would
actually be inset by 1.25 inches. Nice huh? :)
In V1.1 of the framework, they
Have you seen what Sells Brothers, Inc. is doing with Rotor?
http://www.sellsbrothers.com/spout/#refCountRotor
---
Patrick Steele ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lead Software Architect
Image Process Design
> -Original Message-
> From: Dejan Jelovic [mailto:dejan@;JELOVIC.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday,
Patrick Steele wrote:
> > What I can't understand why reference couting wasn't
> > implemented in CLI as a standard facility. A [Counted]
> > attribute would do the trick nicely.
> > ...
>
> See:
>
>
http://discuss.develop.com/archives/wa.exe?A2=ind0010a&L=dotnet&P=39459
I've seen Brian's argumen
> First of all, you say: "The key is in the std::swap. It is guaranteed,
> by the standard, never to throw".
Technically, you are correct about std::swap. Again, I need to be more
clear. std::swap on raw pointers is guaranteed never to throw. (simiar
to an assignment, but easier to write) And,
First of all, you say: "The key is in the std::swap. It is guaranteed, by the
standard, never to throw".
This is just not true. This is how swap is defined:
template
void swap(T& first,T& second)
{
T temp(first); // can throw
first = second; // can throw
second = temp; // can throw
> -Original Message-
> From: Dejan Jelovic [mailto:dejan@;JELOVIC.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Exception safety in C#
>
> What I can't understand why reference couting wasn't
> implemented in CLI
> as a standar
Ooops. I have succeeded in being not so clear again. :-) For some
reason, I have an uncanny knack at that. :-(
OK, what I *really* meant had nothing to do with assignment operations and
copy operations in C#. They had more to do with the exception safety
guideline that reads similar to this:
> > I think the problem comes down to calculating the SHA-160
> > hash of 2^63 (on average) public keys. Someone else might
> > know how much CPU that would take. Presumably it's not
> > prohibitively expensive, since MSFT makes the CLR do it
> > once every time it loads a signed assembly.
>
> But
Yeah, for those unsigned types I suppose you could do that. But you still
have the floating point types as well. You'll still have to write your own
byte swap code for these. I usually just write a class that can byte swap
every numeric type on the platform and then write my serialize/deserializ
Ian Griffiths wrote:
> So if you want to assign a bunch of stuff you would just do this:
>
> temp1 = orig1.Clone();
> temp2 = orig2.Clone();
> temp3 = orig3.Clone();
>
> // If we were going to have thrown we
> // would have done by now.
> dest1 = temp1;
> dest2 = temp2;
> dest3 = t
That did it! Thanks very much!
Original Message Follows
From: "Clemens F. Vasters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics."
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor l
There are no copy constructors in C#, so how exactly would this be an issue?
Assignment is never overloaded. So I don't think it can ever throw. Isn't
the only reason that this is only a big hairy issue in C++ because you can't
trust things like assignment not to throw?
So if you want to assign
I'll ask the obligatory "why can't you use the objects in the
System.DirectoryServices namespace?" here. Now that we've gotten that out of
the way...
Passing structures that contain pointers to structures or arrays of
structures between managed and unmanaged code generally requires either a
custom
Craig Andera wrote:
> There is an additional weakness in this scheme. Because
> most compilers don't actually record the public key in the
> client, but rather a 64-bit hash of the public key (the public
> key token). Which is hard to attack with brute-force, but
> (I believe) not impossible. I exp
Why bother turning off verification when you can just reverse engineer it
(e.g. ILDASM), change the strong name to use a key pair of your own and
recompile, with whatever modifications you want in place?
If your goal is to stop someone modifying your software and then running the
modified version,
Thanks for your statement!
Java states allways to use the 'network byte order' (which is a defined
standard hopefully, isn't it?). So I assume by using the
'Socket.Net.IPAddress.HostToNetworkOrder' method interoperability can be
reached between a .Net app and any Java app. Am I right, or have I ov
Ok, thanks for that. I can dump most messages. Maybe I do something
terribly wrong but when addding an attachment this does not end up in the
trace file.
Are there any way to programatically dump the whole soap message myself? I
found a property on the request that was called envelope. First I
Java is big endian (the MSB (most significant byte) comes first). .Net
appears to be little endian (LSB (least significant byte) comes first). But
I don't think the standard really specifies anything. So, I guess it just
defaults to whatever the native ordering is for the CPU. For Intel CPU's
t
I want to connect a midp device (java) with a server written in c#.
During tests I noticed that the writeInt method of the 2 languages differs.
At least the way the data is sent over the network is different.
I used a tcp sniffer to test this (sent int number '14'):
-(java)-
Is the serviced component assembly in the GAC? It should be.
-cv
-Original Message-
From: Kuthair Habboush [mailto:khabboush@;HOTMAIL.COM]
Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2002 00:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Problem with COM+ and .NET Enum Parameters in
Method definit
I've been working on an LDAP library and I've managed to work out how to
read info from Active Directory.
I'm now trying to write information back (or delete) and I can't work out
the signatures/struct to use or whether I need to allocate unmanaged memory
and pass that instead.
The LDAP API stuff
24 matches
Mail list logo
