Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] dotNet alternative to mailslot ?

2002-10-29 Thread Manu Jain
Yes, its cross-process communication, and the 1ms ceiling is for cross-process communication on the same machine (which in this case happens 90% of the time). If the objects reside over the network, then the timing requirements are more lenient and for networks that cross the domain, the component

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] UML and .net - Strongly typed datasets

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Livingston
Erick, I wouldn't add any part of .Net types in my UML diagram. I would create a UML Package that has a stereotype of "Framework" called "System.Data (.Net)" and have my persistent/data access layer (usually a package also) show a dependency on this package. I find that trying to model other fra

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Creating dynamic types from XSD

2002-10-29 Thread Hurley, Mark
Brady, I'm just catching up to the discussion. But when we began to write our application in Beta1, we did just that. To keep my explanation short: 1) we leveraged Xsd's as a contract between client and middle tier (the server validated the received xml upon receipt) 2) we leveraged Xsd's on t

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] dotNet alternative to mailslot ?

2002-10-29 Thread Jason Whittington
I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that there's nothing in the .NET framework that works much like mailslots. Mailslots are sort of an oddball relic of 16 bit windows networking. > was looking for. Has anybody used remoting/MSMQ in real-time applications? > Is there any other option in dotNet apart

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] Constructing .Net objects from native code

2002-10-29 Thread Beaulieu, Paul
Hi All, I am trying to use the mscorlib tlb in order to be able to call .NET assembly functions from native code. I am able to do this some of the time without problem. For instance, I am able to call a method that I have that has the following signature: void Method( System.String arg1, params

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] dotNet alternative to mailslot ?

2002-10-29 Thread Cavnar-Johnson, John
One millisecond is your upper limit? I don't think you want to use managed code. A GC will almost certainly force you to miss that, no matter what communication mechanism you use. -Original Message- From: Manu Jain [mailto:manu@;GOSAPPHIRE.COM] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 1:41 PM To:

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] UML and .net - Strongly typed datasets

2002-10-29 Thread Erick Thompson
- Original Message - From: "Philip Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > If you are using UML to model/design a .net application, how do you handle > > data objects, in light of strongly typed datasets/data adapters? > > A strongly typed dataset is a collection of strongly typed datatables and >

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Creating dynamic types from XSD

2002-10-29 Thread Philip Nelson
--- Brady Gaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah - that's the next hurdle. It's KINDA what I'm working on. In essence, I'm > thinking of ways to actually wrap UI around these schema so that forms can > be created to collect data that'll be put into XML (that's then validated > against the schema, o

[ADVANCED-DOTNET] dotNet alternative to mailslot ?

2002-10-29 Thread Manu Jain
Hi All, I have an existing real-time inter-process messaging COM component written in C++ (ATL) that uses mailslots. When I use that component with dotNet using interops, I face issues such as missed events. It also seems as if the interop makes the component noticeably slower. Thus I want to deve

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Creating dynamic types from XSD

2002-10-29 Thread Barry Gervin
You might want to also take a look at MS's form tool for creating/filling in forms to create XML documents - and bound by an XSD Schema. It's called XDocs and will be part of MS Office 11. I could envision a solution that takes the XML - perhaps an XML UpdateGram is generated and sent to sql server

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Creating dynamic types from XSD

2002-10-29 Thread Brady Gaster
Ah - that's the next hurdle. It's KINDA what I'm working on. In essence, I'm thinking of ways to actually wrap UI around these schema so that forms can be created to collect data that'll be put into XML (that's then validated against the schema, of course :)) and saved back to the database. Could y

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Creating dynamic types from XSD

2002-10-29 Thread Andrew Hopper
Hi, Brady- Jay Freeman (aka Saurik - lord knows what that means) has made Anakrino available for download at http://www.saurik.com/net/exemplar/ It works pretty well, but it still needs a little more UI/disassembly work. -Andy Hopper - Original Message - From: "Brady Gaster" <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Creating dynamic types from XSD

2002-10-29 Thread Patrick Steele
As others may be curious, I'll post info here: http://www.saurik.com/net/exemplar/ It's an IL-->C# convertor. It's similar to .NET's ILDASM, but instead of showing the IL, you get C# code (I believe you can still see the IL if you want). --- Patrick Steele ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lead Software Arch

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] UML and .net - Strongly typed datasets

2002-10-29 Thread Philip Nelson
> If you are using UML to model/design a .net application, how do you handle > data objects, in light of strongly typed datasets/data adapters? A strongly typed dataset is a collection of strongly typed datatables and datarows. One way to think of it would be that a dataset is a collection of ta

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Creating dynamic types from XSD

2002-10-29 Thread Philip Nelson
> Here's the problem - i'd like to have the ability to read schema as it is > extracted from the database. Then, using the schema itself, create ASP.NET > (or whatever else i can think of) forms to collect data that will be used by > other areas of the system. \ Most likely for any real sort of ge

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] UML and .net - Strongly typed datasets

2002-10-29 Thread Smith, Ethan
Are you trying to generate code form this model, or just convey an idea? If it's the latter, why not just model the dataobject (typed dataset) as a class, and use a <> Stereotype to annotate the class. That conveys the idea pretty well to me. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Creating dynamic types from XSD

2002-10-29 Thread Brady Gaster
Yes, I expected to see something about this "Anakrino" I've heard about. Could anyone (off-line) give me a little info about this? Brady Gaster Executive Technology Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] 480.575.3625 office 602.790.2081 mobile > -Original Message- > From: Patrick Steele [mailto:PSt

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Creating dynamic types from XSD

2002-10-29 Thread Patrick Steele
ILDASM / Anakrino? :) --- Patrick Steele ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lead Software Architect Image Process Design > -Original Message- > From: Ewin Kiser [mailto:ekiser@;HOUSTON.GEOQUEST.SLB.COM] > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 6:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET

Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Creating dynamic types from XSD

2002-10-29 Thread Ewin Kiser
I"m also looking into a similar application. I am assuming that the source code for XSD.EXE is not available.correct? Thanks, Mike Kiser -Original Message- From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-DOTNET@;DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM]On Behalf Of Brady Gaste